• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Infrastructure platform set to welcome more investors

    April 25, 2018

  • Brunel Pension Partnership launches Active Equities hunt

    April 25, 2018

  • Havering appoints property JV partner

    April 24, 2018

  • LGA slams government for “staircase tax” u-turn

    April 24, 2018

  • London CIV launches sustainable equity fund

    April 19, 2018

  • Council funding boost for stadium for Cornwall

    April 18, 2018

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • Agent 151
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Richard Harbord
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
    • Stephen Sheen
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

Councils going bankrupt? Don’t be Scilly!

1
  • by Guest
  • in Funding
  • — 20 Feb, 2017

photo: Public Domain Images/pixabay, CC0

Recent months have seen two councils receive section 24 notices but Chris Game at the Institute of Local Government (INLOGOV) argues there are signs that more could be on the way.

Remember the old London bus joke: you wait for ages, then three come along at once? Well, some local government finance anoraks have been waiting ages for a 114, and now two 24s arrive, almost in mini-convoy.

Not buses, of course — but key sections of Acts of Parliament. Section 114 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 requires a councils’ chief finance officers (CFO) to issue a s114 Notice reporting to all elected members an actual or impending seriously unbalanced budget.

As indicated, they’re infrequent, issued only in what CIPFA terms (p.3) “the gravest of circumstances”: current spending way beyond budget, reserves virtually exhausted, no imminent solution. Their impact too is grave, effectively freezing spending until councillors agree measures to achieve a balanced budget. But, they do keep the crisis in-house.

The alternative — being required to wash your dirty linen in public — is the dreaded Section 24 of the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2014. Here, a council’s external auditors append a written s24 “recommendation” to their annual audit letter, “copied to the secretary of state”. The recommending and copying may sound chummy, but it’s the bullet-shaped chumminess of a Mafia “message job”. S24 Notices are very nasty, and happily very rare, or were.

Scilly recommendation

Recently the Isles of Scilly Council received one, which is interesting in itself, since not everyone’s clear what it actually is: not part of the already enormous Cornwall Council, but a sui generis unitary authority — in a class of its own.

It’s considerably smaller than my own authority, Birmingham City Council (bear with me, it’s not that daft a comparison), with one-480th of its population though, interestingly, one councillor for every 109 residents, compared to Birmingham’s post-2018 ration of one for every 10,900. And, as a genuine unitary, it has Birmingham’s major functions, including an airport, plus fire services, water supply, sea fisheries and coastal defence.

Unfortunately, Scilly’s unique status doesn’t exempt it from the austerity pressures and grant cuts faced by all English councils. It’s suffering badly, and its external auditors concluded that, with £3m needed to pay staff and suppliers, no council tax income for the last two months of the financial year, and reserves down to £0.5m, the law required Section 24, “recommending” in terms (p.37) that the council get its whole financial act together, extremely pronto.

Its impact, warning notwithstanding, can be surmised from the reaction of the eminent former Labour leader of the previous council to have received a s24 missive (just last November from coincidentally the same auditors, Grant Thornton). “The most concerning audit letter I have seen in all my [36] years on the council” was Cllr Sir Albert Bore’s verdict – the council being Birmingham, and the equivalent budget black hole not £3m but pushing £38m.

Just as Aristotle’s single swallow did not a summer make, two s24s don’t themselves make a systemic winter crisis. They’re surely, though, a sign, given that not one such report was issued to any council during the whole four-year 2010 spending review period, and we’ve now had two in two months.

Signs

But a sign of what? That’s rhetorical. I’m categorically not a local finance expert, and in this blog’s limited remaining space there are no answers – just three observations.

  1. Why no s114s?

 In the past we’d see them at least occasionally. Now there are rumoured sightings – e.g. in Northamptonshire. Yet, what have materialised are the two s24s, the proverbial nuclear option. It’s been suggested that the (post-1988 Local Finance Act) statutory duties of Social Services Directors mean a s114-prompted total spending freeze could prevent, say, a vulnerable child being placed in care. But CIPFA chief executive Rob Whiteman has rejected this interpretation.

  1. Please, not the B-word

There’s unfortunately no way of avoiding the media headline, but Scilly, Birmingham and probably any financially struggling English councils aren’t about to “go bankrupt” in the sense in which the word is commonly understood. UK councils, unlike US local government or our own national government, are statutorily required to set each year a balanced budget. Running a deficit of the smallest fraction of Detroit’s nearly $400m in 2013 is simply not possible – indeed, a very s(c)illy idea.

3. But watch for those ‘statutory duties’

So, not bankruptcy in the normal legal sense, but there are almost daily signs and public warnings: Conservative Surrey’s seriously contemplated 15% council tax referendum; tax hikes all round of approaching 5%; hitherto protected adult care budgets now being cut; and 13% of responding councils in the MJ/LGIU 2017 State of Local Government Finance Survey reporting “a danger they would no longer have enough funding to fulfil their statutory duties in the coming year”.

Which would mean facing legal challenge for failing to meet those statutory duties and/or declaring “technical insolvency”. Not “bankruptcy”, note; but, as the famous duck test puts it: if it looks like, walks like, and quacks like a duck… .

Chris Game is a visiting lecturer at INLOGOV (Institute for Local Government) interested in the politics of local government, local elections, electoral reform and other electoral behaviour, party politics, political leadership and management; member-officer relations, central-local relations, use of consumer and opinion research in local government, the modernisation agenda and the implementation of executive local government.

This article first appeared on the official blog of the Institute of Local Government (INLOGOV), University of Birmingham.

Share

You may also like...

  • S&P affirms BCC rating at AA+ S&P affirms BCC rating at AA+ 7 Nov, 2012
  • Richard Harbord Richard Harbord: Balanced budget reform and a ‘sense of safety’ 24 Oct, 2016
  • Financing the future Financing the future 21 Sep, 2012
  • CIPFA’s Alison Scott on local authority borrowing CIPFA’s Alison Scott on local authority borrowing 12 Dec, 2011

1 Comment

  1. Stephen Sheen says:
    2017/02/21 at 17:42

    I would disagree that section 24 notices are necessarily nasty things. They are basically suggestions that authorities should consider sorting themselves out before the auditors might have to take action. They are rare because auditors have been under-using them, not because they are an extreme weapon of last resort. Credit to Grant Thornton for trying to bring them back into fashion.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register for the Room 151 Weekly Email Digest

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 39 mins ago

    Councils defended for management of £375m in section 106 receipts: Senior figures have defended councils after a report that they are hoarding hundreds of millions of pounds set aside for affordable homes. The Huffington Post this week ran an article[...] dlvr.it/QQt8Xc

    Room 151 39 mins ago

    Government u-turns on ‘staircase tax’: Housing minister Dominic Raab has confirmed a government u-turn on a budget promise to compensate councils for the new “staircase tax” resulting from a 2015 Supreme Court ruling on business[...] dlvr.it/QQt8X9

    Room 151 2 hours ago

    Liverpool borrows £185m from PWLB for road repairs: Liverpool City Council is to fund £185m of borrowing for road repairs through commercial projects and money found through efficiency savings, it has announced. The council has agreed plans to[...] dlvr.it/QQsqm5

    Room 151 2 hours ago

    CCLA makes it 10 years as lead sponsor for LATIF: CCLA will be the lead sponsor for Room151’s Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) & FD’s Summit in September as the event celebrates its 10th anniversary year. 2018 also marks[...] dlvr.it/QQsqhf pic.twitter.com/DEcoB8QpwI

    Room 151 5 hours ago

    #localgov #housing twitter.com/publicnaylor/s…

    Room 151 5 hours ago

    Thanks to all at @public_finance_ and @cipfa for a great evening. Congratulations to all the winners. publicfinanceawards.co.uk/2018-winners/ #localgov pic.twitter.com/pBaCjUsTIR

    Room 151 24 hours ago

    #Infrastructure platform set to welcome more investors room151.co.uk/brief/#infrast… #lgps #localgov #development

    Room 151 24 hours ago

    Brunel #Pension Partnership launches Active Equities hunt room151.co.uk/brief/#brunel-… #localgov

    Room 151 24 hours ago

    Havering appoints #property JV partner room151.co.uk/brief/#haverin… #localgov

    Room 151 24 hours ago

    #LGA slams government for #staircasetax u-turn room151.co.uk/brief/#lga-sla…

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Stephen Sheen: Do we need a statutory override for IFRS 9?: The accounting standard IFRS 9 has prompted much debate. Last Week Peter Worth argued against a statutory override. This week Stephen Sheen makes the case for. In a previous article[...] dlvr.it/QQYzqX pic.twitter.com/6zBtwEgP4a

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Olwen Dutton: Why you should be a demanding PFI client: PFI has been thrust back into the news and it doesn’t make for pleasant reading. Olwen Dutton asks whether PFI deals should be terminated or if there are alternative ways[...] dlvr.it/QQSPvQ pic.twitter.com/tIlqMla0Ly

    Room 151 7 days ago

    Herts agrees JV with Morgan Sindall to develop 500 homes: Hertfordshire County Council has signed a deal to create a 50/50 development joint venture with construction firm Morgan Sindall. The council will use its standalone company, Herts Living Ltd… dlvr.it/QQ5ZZg

    Room 151 1 week ago

    #localgov @JRolfe67 #housing #regeneration twitter.com/SHJFitzgerald/…

    Room 151 1 week ago

    London CIV launches sustainable equity fund room151.co.uk/brief/#london-… #localgov #lgps

    Room 151 1 week ago

    #localgov twitter.com/Rebecca_DTZi/s…

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Newham in danger of missing deadline to publish accounts: The London Borough of Newham is in danger of missing its deadline to publish audited financial statements due to a lack of capacity in its finance team, according to auditors.[...] dlvr.it/QQ3RFn pic.twitter.com/S35NTpUMSJ

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
  • Archives

    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story National infrastructure platform set for post-2018 launch
  • Next story Jonathan Bunt: The threat from ‘right to buy’ hanging over housing innovation

© Copyright 2018 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK