• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • London CIV launches sustainable equity fund

    April 19, 2018

  • Council funding boost for stadium for Cornwall

    April 18, 2018

  • Herts creates development joint venture

    April 18, 2018

  • Half of councils ‘draw down on reserves’

    April 18, 2018

  • Northants completes HQ sale

    April 18, 2018

  • Ashford adopts commercial property strategy

    April 18, 2018

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • Agent 151
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Richard Harbord
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
    • Stephen Sheen
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

Duncan Whitfield on financing frontline services

0
  • by Jo Tura
  • in Interviews
  • — 28 Aug, 2013

Duncan Whitfield is strategic director of finance and corporate services for the London Borough of Southwark. He became finance director in 2005 and before Southwark was at Westminster for 18 years.

Room 151: You lost £6.1m from your Early Intervention Grant – how is the council coping with that?

Duncan Whitfield: As an organisation we see a lot of cross-cutting activities between different departments and services. So as you cut into Early Intervention Grant you are creating pressures in all sorts of other parts of the system. So we have tried to protect the loss around Early Intervention Grant. We had a financial strategy which aimed at a level of savings around children’s services in 13-14 which did not account for that loss of grant. As we moved into 13-14 we stuck at that level so as an organisation we put some level of protection around early intervention by going deeper into other services. That is because we recognise the importance of protecting children of that age.

It’s a bit misleading to try to relate individual grant cuts to individual cuts within the organisation – we need to look at the big picture caused by EIG loss, which did come as a surprise to us, particularly by way of its scale. It was a large number and we couldn’t just directly pass that on to those children and to those who supplied services to them. We had to find other ways of protecting the service through bigger cuts elsewhere and other ways of doing things like buying our town hall.

In 12-13 we leased our building but then it came up for sale and because we could make a sound economic case for doing it we bought the building. That is £1.5m in annual savings that we reported through our 13-14 budget which will probably become double that as we move into 14-15. Those kind of actions are the kind of things we are looking to do to protect our frontline services.

Room 151: You have a £24.9m efficiencies, income generation and savings target. What does that cover?

DW: Income generation is a small proportion. Strategically we have a view of the 25% cut that we needed to make back in 2010. We needed to sit down and have a think about how we might achieve that but what came as a surprise to us was the frontloading of the cuts and the need to deliver up front.

We prioritised back office cuts. It’s easy to say that back office cuts are efficiency savings but there comes a point where cuts in the back office start to impact on the efficiency of the front line. So there was a heavy loading of savings from back office in the first year that gave our front line services time to reorganise the way in which they deliver services to minimise the impact of the cuts.

Politically there is a dynamic that means we would rather tell the world we are working more efficiently, but the scale of the cuts that local government is taking means that there really are some stark choices to be made about what services we can continue to provide and at what level.

The net impact of our savings over three years has been £90m and to say that we can just be £90m more efficient is kind of stretching it. If it was that easy we would be doing it anyway.

So, things like transforming day centres for the elderly is the kind of thing we are looking at. It’s finding different ways of providing that support through different models. We have capitalised in the programme for 14-15 to go and build new amenities for those with learning disabilities and for the elderly. That will mean that we can focus our resources into a smaller number of locations while hopefully providing a better service.

Room 151: You talk about strategic finance initiatives – what are you doing there?

DW: One thing that local authorities are seeing at the moment is a boom in cash balances and that was of great assistance to us in buying our headquarters. We had cash resources earning under 1% on the market and we were looking at comparisons of borrowing at 2.5-3% and the lease that we were paying on the building. So what we found was that by releasing cash, at least temporarily, we made far bigger savings on the acquisition of the building than we would have done had we borrowed.

This may be a temporary measure and we are continually tracking the markets to see when we need to borrow to recoup the cash that we outlaid – it was more than £170m. As we speak now we are looking at other opportunities of where we can use cash to invest in big services to make longer-term revenue savings. Possibly for example, around our PFI schemes. If we can find a mutually agreeable resolution with our partners we will do so and we will seek to make revenue savings as a consequence. That would be by using our cash and our borrowing capability to reduce revenue costs. Using these strategic finance models helps at least delay the impact on frontline services.

As we were operating at a level of cash balances above those we needed we have temporarily removed them to buy the building and when we need the cash back to build schools, houses etc, we’ll borrow.

Southwark is a very big landowner and owns about half of the borough, which is principally a function of our housing stock, so we are always looking to see how we can use our asset management strategy around property and land to generate some kind of revenue stream to sustain a capital programme.

We’re one of the few authorities to be building libraries rather than closing them. We opened Canada Wharf library at the beginning of 2012 and that was a £6m investment, which kind of goes against the grain when others under pressure are being in a position where they have to close. We’re building another library in Camberwell in the next 12-18 months and we’re building a new leisure facility in Elephant and Castle. All of these things are functions of our ability to carry out land and property transactions to generate wealth to put back into the community.

As we build these amenities we’re hoping to make a better place for those who live and work there, it is a priority to us to try to keep that wheel turning even though we’re in a bad time financially.

Room 151: Children and children’s services is mentioned a lot in your reports, including things like free school dinners for all primary age children. Does Southwark have particular strains on the budget in this area in terms of deprivation etc?

DW: We still have deprivation issues, I think we’re in the top six in London and there is something quite strange about the grant settlement in the last three years inasmuch as the biggest loss of spending power has taken place in the more deprived boroughs. That is partly a function of our being the bigger boroughs, so as well as us there is Newham, Tower Hamlets, Hackney, Islington. We’re big and so naturally take a bigger cash hit. But in proportional terms it has been bigger than the average as well.

There are pressures across all the services and it is interesting that with something like local council tax benefit schemes, the elderly have been protected. So we may be putting a disproportionate impact there on younger people and families. So in that context, as the current administration entered power they had a manifesto commitment to free school meals and the total cost of that has now ramped up to around £5m per year. The reason they committed to that was because of things like obesity and because Southwark has one of the biggest obesity problems in London if not the country. Diet is linked to ability to concentrate in the classroom so there is an aspiration that it helps feed educational results.

Room 151: You have a business support grant scheme. What is behind the decision to provide that?

DW: One thing the administration has done over the last three years which has been a protective cushion to the cuts is create a number of funds which the voluntary sector or community could bid into. Some were a consequence of civil disruption from a couple of years ago for example.

So in the context of having to make £90m in savings the administration has put money back into the budget to protect those who need protection and those who are able to transform and work in a different way to survive.

We have had a £2m voluntary sector fund over two to three years and now there is a business support fund which is for the high street in particular. It’s £1m to be allocated over three years on the basis of how do we help sustain high street businesses as they come under increased pressure during the recession.

We had the floods in Herne Hill and that is the kind of event where we need to put money into places to keep them alive. If we’re talking about businesses of course they generate business rates and with business rates retention that has become an increasingly important part of our business. We need to keep that revenue stream alive. From my experience a little bit of help can go a long way and if you can put criteria around how you allocate support to make sure it is going to the right place it is even more useful.

The government hoped that the voluntary sector was part of the solution to some of the cuts but they had to take cuts themselves so to see the voluntary sector coming together and work in a different way with our support through grants is really helpful.

Share

You may also like...

  • LGPS Q&A: Chris Rule of Local Pensions Partnership on housing and regeneration 17 Apr, 2018
  • The two Sues of Guildford DC The two Sues of Guildford DC 1 Dec, 2011
  • Q&A with Birmingham’s Waheed Nazir Q&A with Birmingham’s Waheed Nazir 12 Jun, 2014
  • Q&A with Milton Keynes’ Tim Hannam Q&A with Milton Keynes’ Tim Hannam 5 Jun, 2014

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register for the Room 151 Weekly Email Digest

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 1 hour ago

    Herts agrees JV with Morgan Sindall to develop 500 homes: Hertfordshire County Council has signed a deal to create a 50/50 development joint venture with construction firm Morgan Sindall. The council will use its standalone company, Herts Living Ltd… dlvr.it/QQ5ZZg

    Room 151 6 hours ago

    #localgov @JRolfe67 #housing #regeneration twitter.com/SHJFitzgerald/…

    Room 151 6 hours ago

    London CIV launches sustainable equity fund room151.co.uk/brief/#london-… #localgov #lgps

    Room 151 7 hours ago

    #localgov twitter.com/Rebecca_DTZi/s…

    Room 151 8 hours ago

    Newham in danger of missing deadline to publish accounts: The London Borough of Newham is in danger of missing its deadline to publish audited financial statements due to a lack of capacity in its finance team, according to auditors.[...] dlvr.it/QQ3RFn pic.twitter.com/S35NTpUMSJ

    Room 151 10 hours ago

    Enfield funds new housing association with right to buy receipts: The London Borough of Enfield has agreed to fund the creation of a new housing association in which it will take a minority stake, in order to spend £50m of[...] dlvr.it/QQ2hqH pic.twitter.com/Q8Dc5eQuyY

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Council funding boost for stadium for Cornwall room151.co.uk/brief/#council… #infrastructure #development

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Herts creates #development joint venture room151.co.uk/brief/#herts-c… #housing #property

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Half of councils ‘draw down on reserves’ room151.co.uk/brief/#half-of… #localgov #lgps #treasury

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Northants completes HQ sale room151.co.uk/brief/#northam… #localgov

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Ashford adopts commercial #property strategy room151.co.uk/brief/#ashford… #localgov #lgps #housing #treasury

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Government's terms for #businessrates review published room151.co.uk/brief/#terms-f… #localgov #mhclg

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Good chat with LPP's Chris Rule about #LGPS investment in #housing and #regeneration @LPFA1 room151.co.uk/interviews/lgp… #localgov

    Room 151 2 days ago

    #localgov #lgps twitter.com/kshackleton1/s…

    Room 151 2 days ago

    LGPS Pools Roundup: Access appoints Link, CIO for Border to Coast, Central launches funds, new chair for Northern Pool: ACCESS Link wins pooling contract ACCESS  has appointed Link Fund Solutions Ltd to establish and operate its authorised contractual… dlvr.it/QPq8BJ

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Five LGPS funds invest £100m in the private rented sector: Five pension funds agreed last year to commit £100m to a fund aimed at building and managing housing in the private rented sector. Room151 reveals how it came about. The[...] dlvr.it/QPq00D pic.twitter.com/MHjD2vWny2

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Changing the Guard: New Fed leadership and what’s ahead for the world’s most important central bank: Sponsored Article: A change in leadership often sparks intrigue from investors—particularly when the leader is the chair of the world’s most important… dlvr.it/QPpzwx pic.twitter.com/9JWmWJXLzq

    Room 151 2 days ago

    LGPS Q&A: Chris Rule of Local Pensions Partnership on housing and regeneration: Interest in housing and regeneration among institutional investors is growing. In an exclusive interview for Room151, Chris Rule discusses the Local Pensions Partnership’s… dlvr.it/QPpqBS pic.twitter.com/CwuKp8m2ur

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Jeff Houston: LGPS and investment cost transparency: The LGPS Advisory Board has been the first to sign up to a new disclosure template for investment costs. Jeff Houston explains what’s happening and why. It seems a very[...] dlvr.it/QPpq0Y pic.twitter.com/gxW8PinJpX

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Karen Shackleton: The cost conundrum of active managers: LGPS is in a better position to assess the cost of active managers, even if it remains difficult. It is common sense to take costs into account when judging the[...] dlvr.it/QPpfZ1 pic.twitter.com/gfVirgWcy2

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
  • Archives

    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story What the BRIC concept did for India
  • Next story Resident engagement: a powerful catalyst for financial change

© Copyright 2018 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK