• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • DCN calls for delay to 75% business rates retention

    February 22, 2019

  • Spending on children seeking asylum doubles

    February 22, 2019

  • Trafford predicts £278m debt increase

    February 21, 2019

  • Select committee calls for change to business rates

    February 21, 2019

  • Local government finance system “not sustainable”

    February 20, 2019

  • County looks to raise cash from farm sales

    February 20, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

LGPS actuarial valuations: which methodology works best?

0
  • by Guest
  • in LGPSi · Recent Posts
  • — 6 Dec, 2012

Barry McKay is a Partner and Actuary at Hymans Robertson LLP

At Hymans, we view the valuation as an opportunity for a complete risk management review. The economic landscape has changed and technology has allowed significant advancements in many different
fields. The actuarial profession is no different. We can now use technology to deliver better solutions and
manage risk. Our valuation approach distinguishes between measurement of the funding position and management of contribution rates.

Measurement

The LGPS Regulations require the actuary to report the balance sheet position. To do this the actuary makes lots of assumptions. These assumptions do not change the benefits accrued by members and so do not affect the cost, but only the pace at which the assets are built up. In other words, pay less now, pay more later. The assets are measured at market value. It is therefore important to use a market based approach to value the liabilities to ensure consistency. Basing assumptions on market conditions is the “least bad” approach as the market offers the most objective view of future expected economic conditions.

Any other approach is more subjective and introduces inconsistency. Our approach is also more suitable for crystallization events – where a participating employer becomes insolvent and a deficit has to be repaid. However, regardless of what assumptions are adopted, the answer is based on a single set of assumptions. One thing is certain – these will be wrong. Clearly we don’t know how long everyone is going to live or what inflation will be over the next 20 years. If things turned out exactly in line with our assumptions then the fund would be fully funded.

However, life is not like that.

This has been particularly true recently when markets have been extremely volatile. If we ask:
If you pay the calculated contribution rate, how likely are we to meet our objective of being 100% funded
within an appropriate timescale? The traditional valuation approach cannot answer this question! In fact, there is no guarantee of being fully funded even if the certified contribution rate is paid every year – as we are all only too painfully aware from recent experience!

In fact, the real question is whether we will have enough assets to pay benefits as and when they fall due, rather than focussing on what assumptions are adopted.

Management

Our aim is to set contributions that are stable, affordable, prudent and help ensure the security of the fund. We recognise that contributions can vary significantly from one valuation to the next. This does not help employers plan ahead or set budgets. One of the key benefits of our approach is to manage contributions to allow greater stability for employers. Our model tests thousands of future economic scenarios, rather than a single set of assumptions. We can test different contribution strategies to answer a similar question to that above. If we pay a stabilised contribution, how likely are we to meet our objective of being 100% funded over the same timescale?

Our approach assesses the risk attached to adopting a particular contribution strategy rather than relying on a single set of assumptions on a particular day.

Summary

Our risk based approach is one that tPR encourages in the private sector, will be suited to future governance requirements and will stand external scrutiny. It provides administering authorities with an assessment of risk enabling them to make informed decisions and keep their funds safe.

Note from the Editor: If you would like to present an alternative methodology for LGPS actuarial valuations on Room151 please contact editor@room151.co.uk
——————————————————————————————————————————————————–
07 February 2013
2nd LAPF Strategic Investment Forum (The Landmark Hotel, London)
Strategic investment thinking for senior LGPS investment officers, their independent advisers and heads of LGPS investment committees. Jointly organised by AIConferences and LAPF Investments Magazine
Free places offered on a first-come-first-served basis to qualifying delegates
Email: register@aiconferences.com

Share

You may also like...

  • Risks rise as markets move higher and economies strengthen Risks rise as markets move higher and economies strengthen 6 Nov, 2013
  • Border to Coast launches sub-funds with assets worth £7bn 2 Aug, 2018
  • Five London LGPS funds go it alone to invest in private debt 12 Apr, 2018
  • LGPS Q&A: Peter Wallach on the Northern Pool, infrastructure and downside equity protection 18 Jul, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 20 hours ago

    Spending on children seeking asylum doubles room151.co.uk/brief/#spendin… #localgov

    Room 151 20 hours ago

    DCN calls for delay to 75% business rates retention room151.co.uk/brief/#dcn-cal… #localgov

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Ashford to build and run solar farm to raise revenue: Ashford Borough Council will borrow £6m from the Public Works Loan Board to build a solar farm it says will produce a return of 6.7% a year to fund services.[...] dlvr.it/QzNZmS pic.twitter.com/khvp447NDe

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Croydon’s Brick by Brick to borrow more council money: London Borough of Croydon’s standalone housing company has pushed back the date by which it will become self-financing after announcing plans to borrow more cash to develop new sites. In[...] dlvr.it/QzKB8b pic.twitter.com/5E1RZyiIyv

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Councils to receive full compensation for waste overhaul requirements room151.co.uk/brief/#council… # localgov

    Room 151 3 days ago

    High street woes cause revenue dip at council-owned retail park room151.co.uk/brief/#high-st… #localgov #Bournmouth

    Room 151 3 days ago

    County looks to raise cash from farm sales room151.co.uk/brief/#county-… #localgov @StaffordshireCC

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Warrington outlines robust defence of out-of-borough investments: Warrington Borough Council has outlined its reasons for departing from government investment guidance and continuing to borrow to invest in revenue-generating property outside its… dlvr.it/QzJWtt pic.twitter.com/vxCqb5xnKT

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Managing ill-health risk in the LGPS: Barry McKay provides a health-check on how Local Government Pension Scheme funds can mitigate risks from ill-health retirements. Most LGPS benefits build up gradually during each member’s employment.  However, if[...] dlvr.it/QzJWqk pic.twitter.com/HyRrtUu8dw

    Room 151 4 days ago

    Business rates retention reform lacks rigour says IFS: The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says that the government’s proposals for reform of business rates retention need further work. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)… dlvr.it/QzDVm8 pic.twitter.com/QKNrDyZP74

    Room 151 4 days ago

    Ashfield raises property stake to £104m room151.co.uk/brief/#ashfiel… #localgov

    Room 151 4 days ago

    Barking and Dagenham to double external borrowing room151.co.uk/brief/#barking… #localgov

    Room 151 5 days ago

    A busy and unpromising timetable for local authority finances: Richard Harbord looks at the large amount of central government measures affecting councils due over the next 13 months. Time is running out, the current uncertainty damaging, and the… dlvr.it/Qz81pV pic.twitter.com/FvQbpvz2dn

    Room 151 5 days ago

    Getting to grips with governance: Poor governance can make the difference between local authorities coping and not coping. Aileen Murphy explores what national government should be doing to help section 151 officers carry out their[...] dlvr.it/Qz81kf pic.twitter.com/2tywD1wu7H

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Sutton announces new chief executive room151.co.uk/brief/#sutton-… #localgov @SuttonCouncil

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Spelthorne halts commercial property investment: Spelthorne Borough Council has called time on its controversial programme of borrowing from the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) to fund commercial property investment. Over the past three years, the[...] dlvr.it/Qyvbrt pic.twitter.com/yECeMm6uUP

    Room 151 1 week ago

    LGPS board considers guidance to avoid conflicts of interest: The LGPS Advisory Board is consulting on whether new rules are needed to avoid conflicts of interest in the governance of the scheme. It has appointed pension adviser Hymans Robertson[...] dlvr.it/Qyvbk7 pic.twitter.com/hLtp4ekKuH

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Eighty percent of councils lack faith in sustainability of local authority finances room151.co.uk/brief/#eighty-… #localgov

    Room 151 1 week ago

    MP criticises county over incinerator project room151.co.uk/brief/#mp-crit… #localgov

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Danny Mather on loans to Housing Associations, bond issuance and financial innovation
  • Next story The Chancellor’s Autumn Statement

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK