• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • London CIV launches sustainable equity fund

    April 19, 2018

  • Council funding boost for stadium for Cornwall

    April 18, 2018

  • Herts creates development joint venture

    April 18, 2018

  • Half of councils ‘draw down on reserves’

    April 18, 2018

  • Northants completes HQ sale

    April 18, 2018

  • Ashford adopts commercial property strategy

    April 18, 2018

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • Agent 151
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Richard Harbord
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
    • Stephen Sheen
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

Stephen Sheen: Squeezing benefits out of auditors

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Recent Posts · Technical
  • — 15 May, 2014

Stephen Sheen is the managing director of Ichabod’s Industries, a consultancy providing technical accounting support to local government. The article below will be published in the forthcoming issue of Room151 Quarterly. To receive a copy (subject to availability) please complete this form. 

It may seem that we are inching our way towards local audit, albeit at some indeterminate point in 2017 or 2020. But some giant strides have already been taken whose muddy footprints may mark the audit landscape for years to come. The headlines have been dominated by cost. The abolition of the Audit Commission projected savings of £250m across local government up to 2017. The re-tendering of private sector appointments promised at least another £30m.
There are questions to be asked about whether audits can be carried out effectively at the contracted prices on a sustainable basis. Two of the Big Four accountancy firms have been priced out of the market, and there is a deficiency of evidence that the remaining firms are investing substantially to fill the deficit in
technical resources left by the running down of the Commission and the exclusion of its regional experts from outsourcing staff transfers.
To a large extent, this is the auditors’ problem. They are contracted to deliver an opinion on the financial statements in compliance with auditing standards and the Commission’s Code of Practice, at the agreed fee.
In doing this, auditors are assisted by an attitudinal shift away from audit as a public good towards it being a service for the authority. The scope of local authority audit has been reduced to exclude specific responsibilities for opinions on financial standing, legality of transactions and fraud. Powers to intervene remain available. But in the last two years only two public interest reports have been issued for principal authorities across the whole of England. Other powers have lain unused.
The opportunity was offered during the legislative process for the Local Audit and Accountability Act 2013 to reinvigorate expectations that the role of auditor is to hold authorities to account. But the Act confirms that their duties are restricted to giving an opinion on the financial statements and a high-level view on the adequacy of arrangements for securing value for money: a signature to support your view of your business. However, the perception still seems to hold in local government that auditors work to their own
purposes, as an imposition. What benefits could authorities accrue from dealing with their auditors as service providers in similar ways to other service providers?
There are three main areas where immediate benefits could be secured: 1) ensuring the auditors are working to a relevant agenda 2) confirming proper resources are allocated to the authority, in terms of both competence and experience of staff 3) making reporting effective by being above all constructive.
Many of the difficulties that arise between authorities and the auditors can be traced to the auditor bringing their own issues to the assignment, rather than gaining an understanding of your business and what might be material to users of your accounts. This can be particularly problematic where the agenda is a firm-wide one based on what is significant for the audit of commercial organisations.
For instance, some authorities have been required to spend considerable time demonstrating why they are a going concern or confirming that members are not substantial related parties. Big issues in the private sector, where investors need to be assured that assets are not about to lose all their value and business has not been affected by non-commercial relationships with the families of directors. But not for local government, where continuity of services is generally assured and favoured relationships are prohibited.
Of immediate concern is a skewed focus on property valuations, and an inconsequential change to the relevant provisions in the 2013/14 Accounting Code. Property would be a prime area for pumping up the balance sheet with inflated values…if there were anyone in local government who might be impressed. But where the value of property is sufficiently accurately stated to impress taxpayers with the scale of the
authority’s stewardship (and is comfortably in excess of borrowings), there is little more to be gained from the pursuit of accuracy.
Your wish, more likely, is that if auditors are going to devote resources to auditing property, this is with the objective of providing assurance that the authority’s dealings have complied with statutory requirements. So take the first steps now to ensuring that the auditors are providing a service for you, by balancing the agenda in your interests. If auditors are going to trample all over your accounts, at least make sure that they do it with clean boots.

Share

You may also like...

  • Graham Liddell: Living happily ever after (with a shared service) 7 Jun, 2016
  • Next steps in Icelandic asset recovery Next steps in Icelandic asset recovery 23 Nov, 2011
  • Rob Whiteman on combating the complacent Rob Whiteman on combating the complacent 2 Apr, 2014
  • Peterborough partners with Honeywell in energy efficiency framework Peterborough partners with Honeywell in energy efficiency framework 26 Jul, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register for the Room 151 Weekly Email Digest

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 8 hours ago

    Herts agrees JV with Morgan Sindall to develop 500 homes: Hertfordshire County Council has signed a deal to create a 50/50 development joint venture with construction firm Morgan Sindall. The council will use its standalone company, Herts Living Ltd… dlvr.it/QQ5ZZg

    Room 151 13 hours ago

    #localgov @JRolfe67 #housing #regeneration twitter.com/SHJFitzgerald/…

    Room 151 14 hours ago

    London CIV launches sustainable equity fund room151.co.uk/brief/#london-… #localgov #lgps

    Room 151 14 hours ago

    #localgov twitter.com/Rebecca_DTZi/s…

    Room 151 15 hours ago

    Newham in danger of missing deadline to publish accounts: The London Borough of Newham is in danger of missing its deadline to publish audited financial statements due to a lack of capacity in its finance team, according to auditors.[...] dlvr.it/QQ3RFn pic.twitter.com/S35NTpUMSJ

    Room 151 18 hours ago

    Enfield funds new housing association with right to buy receipts: The London Borough of Enfield has agreed to fund the creation of a new housing association in which it will take a minority stake, in order to spend £50m of[...] dlvr.it/QQ2hqH pic.twitter.com/Q8Dc5eQuyY

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Council funding boost for stadium for Cornwall room151.co.uk/brief/#council… #infrastructure #development

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Herts creates #development joint venture room151.co.uk/brief/#herts-c… #housing #property

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Half of councils ‘draw down on reserves’ room151.co.uk/brief/#half-of… #localgov #lgps #treasury

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Northants completes HQ sale room151.co.uk/brief/#northam… #localgov

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Ashford adopts commercial #property strategy room151.co.uk/brief/#ashford… #localgov #lgps #housing #treasury

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Government's terms for #businessrates review published room151.co.uk/brief/#terms-f… #localgov #mhclg

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Good chat with LPP's Chris Rule about #LGPS investment in #housing and #regeneration @LPFA1 room151.co.uk/interviews/lgp… #localgov

    Room 151 2 days ago

    #localgov #lgps twitter.com/kshackleton1/s…

    Room 151 3 days ago

    LGPS Pools Roundup: Access appoints Link, CIO for Border to Coast, Central launches funds, new chair for Northern Pool: ACCESS Link wins pooling contract ACCESS  has appointed Link Fund Solutions Ltd to establish and operate its authorised contractual… dlvr.it/QPq8BJ

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Five LGPS funds invest £100m in the private rented sector: Five pension funds agreed last year to commit £100m to a fund aimed at building and managing housing in the private rented sector. Room151 reveals how it came about. The[...] dlvr.it/QPq00D pic.twitter.com/MHjD2vWny2

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Changing the Guard: New Fed leadership and what’s ahead for the world’s most important central bank: Sponsored Article: A change in leadership often sparks intrigue from investors—particularly when the leader is the chair of the world’s most important… dlvr.it/QPpzwx pic.twitter.com/9JWmWJXLzq

    Room 151 3 days ago

    LGPS Q&A: Chris Rule of Local Pensions Partnership on housing and regeneration: Interest in housing and regeneration among institutional investors is growing. In an exclusive interview for Room151, Chris Rule discusses the Local Pensions Partnership’s… dlvr.it/QPpqBS pic.twitter.com/CwuKp8m2ur

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Jeff Houston: LGPS and investment cost transparency: The LGPS Advisory Board has been the first to sign up to a new disclosure template for investment costs. Jeff Houston explains what’s happening and why. It seems a very[...] dlvr.it/QPpq0Y pic.twitter.com/gxW8PinJpX

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Karen Shackleton: The cost conundrum of active managers: LGPS is in a better position to assess the cost of active managers, even if it remains difficult. It is common sense to take costs into account when judging the[...] dlvr.it/QPpfZ1 pic.twitter.com/gfVirgWcy2

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
  • Archives

    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Manchester outsourcing plan, Core Cities devolution proposals, HRA bids, LEP strategies slammed…
  • Next story Newcastle joins SME lending platform

© Copyright 2018 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK