• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Local government finance system “not sustainable”

    February 20, 2019

  • County looks to raise cash from farm sales

    February 20, 2019

  • High street woes cause revenue dip at council-owned retail park

    February 20, 2019

  • Councils to receive full compensation for waste overhaul requirements

    February 20, 2019

  • LGA calls for government to go further on housing powers

    February 20, 2019

  • Select committee ‘set to probe at local government finance’

    February 20, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

Guy Ware: Stockholm Syndrome and the Spending Review

0
  • by Guest
  • in Resources
  • — 1 Dec, 2015
Guy Ware

Guy Ware

The lobbying, the leaking and the pre-announcements are over. Devilling in the detail has begun. Rising tax revenues and lower interest rates allowed the chancellor to pull back from the brink – no tax credit cuts at all, no new cuts to police. Only one Departmental Expenditure Limit cut above the mooted 40% mark. Guess which one? The local government DEL, which will be cut by 56% in real terms.

Which sounds catastrophic. But what does it mean?

Three things

The good news is, it doesn’t actually mean council budgets will be cut by another 56%. That’s for three reasons.

The first is that the business rates retained by councils are not now included in the DEL. This income will rise while the DEL falls. At London Councils we estimate the combined effect will be to reduce councils’ core funding (Settlement Funding Assessment) by 24% in real terms.

The second is that councils also get to raise Council Tax – of which more later. The third is that, once again, changes in what’s counted make comparisons slippery. The government isn’t actually using the term “spending power” this time, but when they say the cut is only 1.7%, you know what they mean.

The bad news is that 24% cuts – on top of the 44% imposed over the last five years – are going to be grim. Maybe not as grim as we’d been expecting, but still undeniably grim. For treasurers to feel relief would be understandable, but only as a chronic form of Stockholm syndrome.

Shiny infrastructure

In London, while funding plummets, the population grows apace. As a result, the boroughs now face a collective budget gap of at least £2.7bn per annum by 2020.

What does £2.7bn look like? It’s more than they currently spend on everything apart from education, social care and public health.

So, they could stop collecting rubbish and sweeping the streets, close all the libraries, parks and leisure centres, stop housing the homeless, sack the entire “back office” and still have to cut care for people with mental health problems or physical disabilities to balance the books. They won’t, of course, but what they will be forced to do won’t be pretty.

The government will invest in shiny infrastructure projects – but there’ll be no money to maintain decent public space around them.

The NHS gets its £10bn, but many of the services that keep people healthy and sane – and define our quality of life – will disappear. The shift from acute care to prevention – on which both health and local government have pretty much bet the farm – will be harder to deliver.

There’s more money for housing, which is undoubtedly good news. But how many of those 400,000 “affordable” homes can be built in London at a price that is genuinely affordable? (A “starter” home for £450,000 anybody? A “London Help-to-Buy” to push prices further up?)

Meanwhile, the government’s high value asset-stripping of councils’ housing stock, and the cut in social rents (which will cost London boroughs £800m by 2020) make the provision of affordable housing for rent almost impossible.

On the subject of housing, look out for the consultation on New Homes Bonus. Apparently this will simultaneously sharpen incentives, reduce the payment period from six years to four and save £800m to “be used for social care”. Quite a trick if they can pull it off.

Councils can use (non-right-to-buy) asset receipts to meet revenue costs of reform. Which is a good idea, albeit not one that’s going to change the world. Plus they can trim directors’ salaries and squander their reserves. So that’s all right, then.

Not to worry. There’s always council tax. In London the newly-permitted 2% “social care precept” would raise £55m a year. The gap in adult social care will be £900m by 2020.

Big Rock Candy Mountain

So, while the money wouldn’t hurt, it won’t solve the problem. In the meantime, we’ve slipped into a world where local council tax can be hypothecated by the chancellor. And it’s sold as “increased devolution”.

Which brings us to 2020, and 100% business rate retention. There’s limited news about the additional responsibilities to come with it, which means there’s much to play for.

There’s also much work needed before a tax on business property can realistically both reward economic growth and fund the future of population-driven services. And if you think the Government will allow rate income to keep rising by RPI once it’s in councils’ control… you clearly haven’t been paying attention.

So, then: some sparkly pre-Christmas baubles, a distant glimpse of the Big Rock Candy Mountain, and, for now, more brutal cuts. Or as Tom Waits might put it: “Today’s grey skies, tomorrow is tears. You’ll have to wait till yesterday is here.”

Guy Ware is interim director of finance and procurement, London Councils.

Share

You may also like...

  • Asset sales to fund equal pay claims Asset sales to fund equal pay claims 9 Jan, 2013
  • Steering group to debate details of business rates retention 31 Mar, 2016
  • Buying back all PFI contracts won’t guarantee value for money, say experts 28 Sep, 2017
  • Richard Harbord Richard Harbord: The post-holiday horizon is rates retention, restructuring and reserves 11 Sep, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 45 mins ago

    Councils to receive full compensation for waste overhaul requirements room151.co.uk/brief/#council… # localgov

    Room 151 47 mins ago

    High street woes cause revenue dip at council-owned retail park room151.co.uk/brief/#high-st… #localgov #Bournmouth

    Room 151 48 mins ago

    County looks to raise cash from farm sales room151.co.uk/brief/#county-… #localgov @StaffordshireCC

    Room 151 2 hours ago

    Warrington outlines robust defence of out-of-borough investments: Warrington Borough Council has outlined its reasons for departing from government investment guidance and continuing to borrow to invest in revenue-generating property outside its… dlvr.it/QzJWtt pic.twitter.com/vxCqb5xnKT

    Room 151 2 hours ago

    Managing ill-health risk in the LGPS: Barry McKay provides a health-check on how Local Government Pension Scheme funds can mitigate risks from ill-health retirements. Most LGPS benefits build up gradually during each member’s employment.  However, if[...] dlvr.it/QzJWqk pic.twitter.com/HyRrtUu8dw

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Business rates retention reform lacks rigour says IFS: The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says that the government’s proposals for reform of business rates retention need further work. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)… dlvr.it/QzDVm8 pic.twitter.com/QKNrDyZP74

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Ashfield raises property stake to £104m room151.co.uk/brief/#ashfiel… #localgov

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Barking and Dagenham to double external borrowing room151.co.uk/brief/#barking… #localgov

    Room 151 2 days ago

    A busy and unpromising timetable for local authority finances: Richard Harbord looks at the large amount of central government measures affecting councils due over the next 13 months. Time is running out, the current uncertainty damaging, and the… dlvr.it/Qz81pV pic.twitter.com/FvQbpvz2dn

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Getting to grips with governance: Poor governance can make the difference between local authorities coping and not coping. Aileen Murphy explores what national government should be doing to help section 151 officers carry out their[...] dlvr.it/Qz81kf pic.twitter.com/2tywD1wu7H

    Room 151 5 days ago

    Sutton announces new chief executive room151.co.uk/brief/#sutton-… #localgov @SuttonCouncil

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Spelthorne halts commercial property investment: Spelthorne Borough Council has called time on its controversial programme of borrowing from the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) to fund commercial property investment. Over the past three years, the[...] dlvr.it/Qyvbrt pic.twitter.com/yECeMm6uUP

    Room 151 6 days ago

    LGPS board considers guidance to avoid conflicts of interest: The LGPS Advisory Board is consulting on whether new rules are needed to avoid conflicts of interest in the governance of the scheme. It has appointed pension adviser Hymans Robertson[...] dlvr.it/Qyvbk7 pic.twitter.com/hLtp4ekKuH

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Eighty percent of councils lack faith in sustainability of local authority finances room151.co.uk/brief/#eighty-… #localgov

    Room 151 6 days ago

    MP criticises county over incinerator project room151.co.uk/brief/#mp-crit… #localgov

    Room 151 7 days ago

    How National LGPS Frameworks are saving funds and pools millions: With more than 247 contracts already let and £105m secured in savings, National LGPS Frameworks have become the ‘go-to-route’ for specialist procurement within the LGPS, according to Leon… dlvr.it/QyqR7k pic.twitter.com/Vc40cgTDjb

    Room 151 7 days ago

    Haringey reserves raid ‘unsustainable’ say officers: London Borough of Haringey has agreed plans to balance its budget for next year by dipping into its reserves and proposing £13.7m of cuts whilst increasing spending on social care[...] dlvr.it/QyqR33 pic.twitter.com/GT8PNPOAmM

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Newham aims to end non-compliance culture: London Borough of Newham has established a new commission to help it get a grip on its financial management after a series of scandals. The new body will assess the[...] dlvr.it/QyplW9 pic.twitter.com/YP1CwMtg1k

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Richard Harbord: Spending Review makes the viability of councils a talking point
  • Next story Spending Review: Hokey cokey with the chancellor

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK