• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Agent151: Bad behaviour

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151
  • — 13 Oct, 2015

agent 151 520Ever since budgets were invented, budget holders have been trying to find ways to subvert the system. Local government is experiencing budget reductions on an unprecedented scale, and this has resulted in an outbreak of bad budget behaviour in some councils.

Is it happening in your organisation? What should you be looking for? Here is a handy identification chart of budget holders who use crafty dodges in an attempt to fool their section 151 officer. You may recognise some of them.

The Pet Service Protector:  The council has priorities decided by councillors, but this budget holder has their own priorities and will offer up essential services to be cut so long as their cherished favourite is left alone.

The Lobbyist: This budget holder is busy whispering in the ear of any councillor they can buttonhole about why their area shouldn’t be cut and why ‘them over there’ should cop it instead.

The Fighter: Never mind about corporate priorities and doing your bit, this budget holder is going to fight for every penny. The budget process becomes a tedious argument in which everyone ends up with a headache.

The Ducker and Diver: Stashes away money they can’t spend by disguising it as a ‘service credit’ with a contractor. Requires a complicit supplier, and is skating on very thin ice indeed.

The Squirrel: Invents reasons for creating an earmarked reserve with that underspend that sound genuine but are really no more than excuses for saving for a rainy day.

The Dramatist: This budget holder likes to create the impression every year that they are going to massively overspend their budget, but then magically comes in just under at year end. Everyone thinks the budget is under such pressure it can’t be cut.

The Horticulturalist: Bent on achieving growth in their budget, they will always bid for new funding from the corporate pot, dressing up the flimsiest reasons to smell rosy.

The Switcher: Having agreed that a service will be cut through the corporate budget process, and put councillors through the pain of making the decision in public, this budget holder will find an alternative source of funding – perhaps a specific grant – and quietly keep it open.

The Muddler: Ever seen budgets structured in such a complex and unintelligible way that no-one can make any sense of them, accountability is obscured, and management information is impossible to obtain? You’ve encountered the Muddler!

The Gravedigger: If you approach this budget holder with a savings target, they will immediately bury you under a pile of information including service metrics, outcomes, value for money, benchmarking, and more. This will prove to be both useless and more information than is humanly possible to digest, and ensure that nothing at all happens.

The Committer: Sorry, this budget holder will say, sucking in their breath through their teeth, but all of my budgets are committed to long-term contracts. Nothing anyone can do. Sorry. Move along. Nothing to see here.

The Refusenik: Secretly has no intention of implementing any savings, and after going through the budget process in silent dissent, takes no action and simply reports that they are overspending.

The Postponer: This budget holder always seems to be able to find a reason why the delivery of their savings should be shifted to a future year.

 The Shrugger: Scratches their head and admits that they have no clue how to save any money, and suggests that a project/commission/committee is set up to look into it, thereby buying another two years of inaction.

Of course, as a finance professional you are expected to spot and deal with all of these types as a matter of routine. It isn’t easy. But this identification chart may help. Next time you encounter some bad behaviour, just point at the chart. The budget holder will realise not only that they’ve been rumbled, but also that the behaviour they thought was so original and clever was no more than a tired cliché. That should put a stop to it.

Share

You may also like...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 11 hours ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 day ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 1 day ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 2 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 6 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

    Room151 1 week ago

    Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash: Dan Bates discusses the latest data on the publication of local authority accounts and examines why so many councils missed the 31 July deadline. Sunday 31 July 2022 was the[...] dlvr.it/SVx2ZT pic.twitter.com/gdELhD3Yis

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Business rates reform raises uncertainty for council revenues
  • Next story Right to Buy figures “will not stack up”

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares