• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

A busy week for banks leaves locals looking for a new home

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green
  • — 7 Nov, 2013

dg-grey
Those of us who returned to work this week after a half term holiday came back to a flurry of news on two of the UK’s weaker banks. The most important of last Friday’s three announcements from Royal Bank of Scotland told us that the government has decided not to split it into “good” and “bad” banks after all. Archbishop Welby’s idea to split RBS into several regional banks has also fallen by the wayside – it might have been good for promoting competition, but not so great for promoting the value of the taxpayers’ stake. Rumours that RBS would sell the half of Ulster Bank that’s not impaired were also scotched on Friday as the bank committed to remaining a key player on both sides of the Irish border. It will however require its Belfast subsidiary to follow a “viable and sustainable business model” going forward, something it has clearly failed to do so far.

The stock market didn’t react too well, with RBS’s share price falling by 10% in the last week. The market had hoped that the government would take full ownership of the worst of the bank’s Irish loans and commercial property assets, leaving them with a larger stake in the loans that are actually being repaid on time. But at least we can now be fairly confident what RBS will look like in a few years’ time – it seems it will now “only” be split into three parts. First, 314 branches and Natwest Direct will be spun off in 2015 to form Williams & Glyn’s, as part of the penalty for receiving state aid in 2008. Then, the Vickers reforms will see the remainder of RBS split into a ring-fenced retail bank, dealing with simple banking products for individuals and small businesses, and an investment bank dealing with mergers and acquisitions, share and bond issues and derivative trading. Legislation to force this separation is in its final Parliamentary stages as I write.

Then, over breakfast on Monday, we were finally treated to the details of Co-operative Bank’s recapitalisation plan, first heralded in June. This will see the bank’s junior bondholders, including pensioners who bought Britannia PIBS in the 1990s, suffering haircuts of up to 40% on their investments. The only snag is that the loss is entirely voluntary, and so the Co-op needs 75% of each of four classes of affected investors to vote in favour of giving up their future income. UK law also requires two thirds of ballot papers to be returned for the losses to imposed on all bonds, including the holdouts. With the results due in the middle of December, the parallel with turkeys voting for Christmas is a difficult one to resist.  The level headed investor will probably vote to be plucked (turkeys can’t have haircuts) when the alternative is to suffer a complete roasting.  Even the Co-op management admits that the bank will be placed “into resolution” if the recapitalisation fails. In the absence of Santa Claus charging to the rescue at the last minute, resolution is likely to lead pretty quickly to insolvency. Co-op helpfully estimates that junior bondholders will lose everything in insolvency, and that even senior creditors and depositors will get back just 91.5% over a five year period.

Resolution would most likely see the current accounts and the first £85,000 in savings of individuals and small businesses moved to another bank. But larger companies, charities and local authorities would be left behind. And it’s difficult to see how the regulator could allow the 100 or so local authorities to continue making payments from their current accounts, without it having a detrimental effect on the bank’s other creditors. So the big danger is that if the turkeys don’t vote for Christmas, or if pensioners can’t understand or be bothered to return their forms, then many council staff and suppliers won’t get their December pay cheques and won’t have a very merry Christmas themselves.

We’ve also learnt that even following a successful recapitalisation, the Co-op will stop providing local authority current accounts within a year or so. The 700 page bond prospectus included the cryptic clue that while they currently service charities, social businesses and public sector bodies, in future they will continue to look after charities and social businesses but not certain customers who are either too complex to be supported by the bank’s retail IT platform or who fail to deliver a sufficient profit margin for the bank. Guess for yourself which category you fall into. At least they hope to help you smoothly transfer your accounts to a new supplier “in a controlled and ethical manner.”

On the plus side, this recent turn of events should help galvanise authorities that were previously too worried about either breaking procurement rules or upsetting their relationship manager to start looking for a new bank any earlier.  And with mid-December only a few weeks away, I wouldn’t waste any time on this, just in case.

David Green is Client Director at Arlingclose Limited. This is the writer’s personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice.

Share

You may also like...

  • European progress? European progress? 29 Nov, 2011
  • ECB reliant on ‘confidence’ ECB reliant on ‘confidence’ 19 Dec, 2011
  • PSAA begins as Appointing Person for public sector audits PSAA begins as Appointing Person for public sector audits 23 Jan, 2019
  • Surviving the storm: how resilient are local authorities? Surviving the storm: how resilient are local authorities? 6 Jan, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 2 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 3 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 4 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 4 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 5 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Matt Bance on multi-asset investing for treasurers
  • Next story RBS downgrade, Peterborough bond impact, LGPS procurement, North Lanarkshire property deal

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.