• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Agent151: Through a glass, darkly

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Blogs
  • — 17 Sep, 2012

Agent 151 is a senior local authority finance director and S151 officer. The agent writes exclusively for Room151 and is licensed to speak candidly. 

The new regulations on local authority meetings and access to information* came into force on 10th September 2012.  I am trying to make some sense of them. The government’s Transparency Agenda – a pledge to make government more open – is a damp squib if ever I saw one.  It is underpinned by two weak ideas.

The first of these is that making lots of government data available to the public is intrinsically helpful.  It isn’t.  Making useful information available to people is helpful.  The idea that the average council taxpayer is willing to sift through mountains of data in the hope that they will ultimately be able to extract a piece of useful information is, frankly, ludicrous.   Most information that is useful is published in committee reports and minutes, annual reports, statements of accounts, auditor reports, and a plethora of other documents.  In fact, faced with the prospect of ploughing through all of this, most people would say there is too much already!

The second is the odd idea that there are lots of people who want information about government that isn’t being published already. I’m not talking about state secrets here: lots of people have been waiting for the Hillsborough papers to be released.   I’m talking about routine data – for example, on council contracts and payments.  This is unappealing fare to the average council tax payer.  I don’t recall any friends or acquaintances outside of local government (or indeed inside local government) regaling me with tales of how they browsed pages of data on council websites from their armchairs out of interest.  People with a normal range of interests, friends and family give this kind of thing the same level of priority as bus spotting.

Local government is complex.  If you have ever tried to explain local government to anyone that isn’t somehow professionally involved with it, you will be familiar with the glassy look that descends upon their features after only a few moments.  It is too complex to explain in only a few sentences, and in this media age of Twitter and sound bite, that means it is too complex to matter to most people unless it goes badly wrong.  The fact is that most residents are at their happiest with their local council when they don’t have to think about their local council. So why does the government persist in the delusion that there is a vast appetite out there for such information?  Is this the work of campaigners like the Taxpayers’ Alliance, or is it, as I am tempted to suggest, the work of politicians who wish that voters were more engaged and mistakenly think that this is the way to achieve it.

On to the new regulations.  Some of the content simply codifies good practice that councils are already following.  Public meetings should be public.  Proper notice should be given of important decisions.  Decisions should be properly recorded.  Councillors should have access to meeting papers.  Quite right, but unfortunately there are some difficult issues in here too.  Regulation 13(4) poses the most acute difficulty: it seems to require officers to produce a written statement for all decisions (not just key decisions) they take under power delegated to them by the Executive.   The statement has to include the reasons for the decision, any alternative options rejected, and any conflict of interest declared together with the relevant dispensation from the chief executive.  So let’s see… every time I order some stationery, say, in addition to the usual paperwork I have to produce a written…  Oh dear!

No doubt local government will sort this out, in the competent way it always does.  Legal opinions are being sought, and common sense will ultimately prevail.  But I must ask: how did this piece of nonsense manage to find its way into the final regulations without being spotted?

Don’t get me wrong.  I am not against openness.  But I think that transparency means making information useful, accessible, and understandable.   Perhaps those drafting future legislation could bear these three words in mind.

Now, about this massive pile of FOI requests…

*Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012, SI 2012/2089

Share

You may also like...

  • The opportunity in the renewables and grid support market as UK looks to ‘build back better’ 3rd Mar, 2021
  • Prudential Code brings ‘clarity’ to investment strategies 14th Jan, 2022
  • ‘Coffee can portfolio’: Investing with Chinese characteristics 15th Jul, 2021
  • Finance chiefs may have to ’embrace the uncertainty’ in financial planning 11th Jun, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
    • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override
    • EAPF criticised for water company investments
    • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy
    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 4 days ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 5 days ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 6 days ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 6 days ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Borrowing and investment data 2011/12
  • Next story Economic and market briefing: the context for policy

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares