• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Cap and trade: unlocking the benefits of scrapping the HRA debt cap

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Blogs · Resources
  • — 19 Nov, 2018

Photo: Pixabay, CC0

The lifting of the housing revenue account debt cap will only boost housing numbers effectively if councils combine the new flexibility with existing models such as housing companies, according to Chris Shepherd.

Let’s be clear, the removal of the HRA debt cap is a positive step.

With the current uncertainties in housing finance, anything that removes artificial barriers, allows experienced professionals to make investment decisions, and gives added flexibility and control is welcome.

Indeed, with many local authorities vehemently campaigning for its removal and the number of current projects which are being restricted by the cap, you can see why it has been suggested that this is “the single biggest barrier” to authorities wanting to deliver new homes.

Its removal could, and should, drive a new era of council house building.

Property consultancy Savills has suggested that removing the cap means that “authorities could release between £10bn-£15bn of extra borrowing capacity… to deliver around 100,000 new homes.” Great news indeed!

Much has been made of the fact that the last time housebuilding targets were met (the mid 1970s) local government was the biggest developer in the market and the removal of the cap will lead to a return of local government as a major player on the development stage.

However, we are a bit more phlegmatic in our response to the lifting of the cap, and here is why.

In terms of the actual physical process of developing homes, what has changed since the announcement (Brexit noise aside)?

Has significantly more developable land at a viable price been found?

Have the construction costs of building new houses significantly reduced or have sales risen faster to make schemes more viable?

In addition, has there been a huge influx of labour and specialist development skills to plug the current shortage that is exacerbating the housing shortage?

With the announcement of the removal of the debt cap, has additional grant or subsidy been made available?

We would suggest that these points play a significantly bigger role in constraining housing development than the removal of an artificial debt cap.

Housing companies

Indeed, faced with limited headroom, many authorities had started to circumnavigate the HRA debt and have sought different routes of housing delivery, through the formation of wholly owned housing development companies or joint ventures with the private development market.

These companies have enabled their owners to be much more flexible in terms of accessing finance, provide a wider choice of tenures and deliver a range of housing through a cross-subsidy model.

Moreover, many councils are recognising that, of all their assets, housing is the most secure and valuable of all, potentially providing long-term income streams and a profile of demand that would make most commercial agents blush.

One finance director said recently: “Yeah, it’s great they removed it, but we have a better way of building houses now”.

By this, they meant that the flexibility offered by the company approach outweighed many of the perceived benefits of using the new borrowing headroom.

Benefits include the ability to address a range of different needs, the removal of the risk of Right to Buy, total control over rent levels and the ability to use any surpluses to provide support for other vital services

All these negative comments make me sound like I am not only phlegmatic about the removal of the debt cap, but also have a desire to knock the very thought of building in the HRA – however, that would be wrong.

As I write this I keep coming back to two words, those being “flexibility” and “choice”.

Blended approach

The HRA is, has to be, part of the housing solution.

It is one more crucial element in the bag of tools available to councils in their quest to deliver necessary housing growth.

There are significant benefits to attacking the problem on a number of fronts, not least that adage about not putting all your eggs in one basket.

The HRA and its interaction with joint ventures and wholly owned companies can play a vital role.

Until rules on the use of Right to Buy receipts change, the removal of the debt cap will allow councils to apply these and making building houses 30% cheaper.

In addition, the ability of the HRA to provide a guaranteed exit for developers, be they council companies or private developers, can be vital in de-risking projects by providing upfront finance in return for a reduction in price.

Finally, the better use of HRA land, through small sites programmes is vital in bringing forward significant hidden housing development.

All in all, I return to my initial point that lifting the HRA debt cap is a positive step welcomed by all, and it will play its part in delivering new homes.

However, the ability of the HRA to contribute to housing delivery is only one instrument, that should be considered alongside the multiple tools that local government has developed as it has become more commercial and innovative in finding ways to deliver housing.

Chris Shepherd is director of housing finance consultancy 31ten

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • IFRS 16: A lot of effort, but a great opportunity too 25th Jan, 2022
  • ESG presents LGPS with investment innovation opportunities 3rd Mar, 2021
  • Collaboration the key to district recovery post-pandemic 13th Apr, 2021
  • Cryptocurrencies: Are they an asset class for LGPS funds? 6th Jul, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 hours ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 24 hours ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 24 hours ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 1 day ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 1 day ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 2 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 2 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 2 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 3 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Councils face £500m bill after ATM business rates ruling
  • Next story Council reserves in shock rise

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares