• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Cap and trade: unlocking the benefits of scrapping the HRA debt cap

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in Blogs · Resources
  • — 19 Nov, 2018

Photo: Pixabay, CC0

The lifting of the housing revenue account debt cap will only boost housing numbers effectively if councils combine the new flexibility with existing models such as housing companies, according to Chris Shepherd.

Let’s be clear, the removal of the HRA debt cap is a positive step.

With the current uncertainties in housing finance, anything that removes artificial barriers, allows experienced professionals to make investment decisions, and gives added flexibility and control is welcome.

Indeed, with many local authorities vehemently campaigning for its removal and the number of current projects which are being restricted by the cap, you can see why it has been suggested that this is “the single biggest barrier” to authorities wanting to deliver new homes.

Its removal could, and should, drive a new era of council house building.

Property consultancy Savills has suggested that removing the cap means that “authorities could release between £10bn-£15bn of extra borrowing capacity… to deliver around 100,000 new homes.” Great news indeed!

Much has been made of the fact that the last time housebuilding targets were met (the mid 1970s) local government was the biggest developer in the market and the removal of the cap will lead to a return of local government as a major player on the development stage.

However, we are a bit more phlegmatic in our response to the lifting of the cap, and here is why.

In terms of the actual physical process of developing homes, what has changed since the announcement (Brexit noise aside)?

Has significantly more developable land at a viable price been found?

Have the construction costs of building new houses significantly reduced or have sales risen faster to make schemes more viable?

In addition, has there been a huge influx of labour and specialist development skills to plug the current shortage that is exacerbating the housing shortage?

With the announcement of the removal of the debt cap, has additional grant or subsidy been made available?

We would suggest that these points play a significantly bigger role in constraining housing development than the removal of an artificial debt cap.

Housing companies

Indeed, faced with limited headroom, many authorities had started to circumnavigate the HRA debt and have sought different routes of housing delivery, through the formation of wholly owned housing development companies or joint ventures with the private development market.

These companies have enabled their owners to be much more flexible in terms of accessing finance, provide a wider choice of tenures and deliver a range of housing through a cross-subsidy model.

Moreover, many councils are recognising that, of all their assets, housing is the most secure and valuable of all, potentially providing long-term income streams and a profile of demand that would make most commercial agents blush.

One finance director said recently: “Yeah, it’s great they removed it, but we have a better way of building houses now”.

By this, they meant that the flexibility offered by the company approach outweighed many of the perceived benefits of using the new borrowing headroom.

Benefits include the ability to address a range of different needs, the removal of the risk of Right to Buy, total control over rent levels and the ability to use any surpluses to provide support for other vital services

All these negative comments make me sound like I am not only phlegmatic about the removal of the debt cap, but also have a desire to knock the very thought of building in the HRA – however, that would be wrong.

As I write this I keep coming back to two words, those being “flexibility” and “choice”.

Blended approach

The HRA is, has to be, part of the housing solution.

It is one more crucial element in the bag of tools available to councils in their quest to deliver necessary housing growth.

There are significant benefits to attacking the problem on a number of fronts, not least that adage about not putting all your eggs in one basket.

The HRA and its interaction with joint ventures and wholly owned companies can play a vital role.

Until rules on the use of Right to Buy receipts change, the removal of the debt cap will allow councils to apply these and making building houses 30% cheaper.

In addition, the ability of the HRA to provide a guaranteed exit for developers, be they council companies or private developers, can be vital in de-risking projects by providing upfront finance in return for a reduction in price.

Finally, the better use of HRA land, through small sites programmes is vital in bringing forward significant hidden housing development.

All in all, I return to my initial point that lifting the HRA debt cap is a positive step welcomed by all, and it will play its part in delivering new homes.

However, the ability of the HRA to contribute to housing delivery is only one instrument, that should be considered alongside the multiple tools that local government has developed as it has become more commercial and innovative in finding ways to deliver housing.

Chris Shepherd is director of housing finance consultancy 31ten

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Reflections on the decisions of the Banks of England and China Reflections on the decisions of the Banks of England and China 7 Jun, 2012
  • Looking ahead: Investment market prospects for 2019 Looking ahead: Investment market prospects for 2019 21 Jan, 2019
  • Jon Rowney: Resetting local government finance Jon Rowney: Resetting local government finance 11 Feb, 2015
  • Implications of Euroland recession Implications of Euroland recession 17 Nov, 2011

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Could 2021 be less eventful for LGPS, please?: Barry McKay looks at McCloud, the 95k exit cap, employer risk and investments to see what to expect for LGPS in the coming year. On one hand, 2020 was in[...] dlvr.it/RtslFd pic.twitter.com/H4debuPmGG

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Fixed income investing can help target both financial and sustainability targets: Sponsored article: Adam Whiteley offers a guide to the ESG benefits of investing in fixed income. Investing responsibly in fixed income can be crucial for local government… dlvr.it/Rtsl9h pic.twitter.com/khJL1xNfGh

    Room151 1 day ago

    Going beyond the standard metrics for climate change: Sponsored article: With climate change an investment imperative and an imminent reporting requirement, Ritesh Bamania argues UK pension schemes should look beyond today’s standard metrics. With… dlvr.it/RtnpLS pic.twitter.com/6ABaFHyS9I

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS webinar: Governance the key to TCFD implementation: LGPS funds have been warned that governance is it at the here of Whitehall plans to impose a new climate reporting regime on pension funds. In January the Department for[...] dlvr.it/RtjwNq pic.twitter.com/YMiMdmRyzU

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS webinar: Central bank management of bond purchasing could affect all asset classes: When the government debt caused by the pandemic is eventually tackled there may be a huge impact on assets of all classes, according to a leading investment expert… dlvr.it/RtjwJx pic.twitter.com/7v8K5vMYHo

    Room151 2 days ago

    #LGPS readers...what to do about #bonds? room151.co.uk/blogs/lgps-web… @BrunelPP 's new CIO, David Vickers tackles a problematic area #centralbanks #assetallocation #fixedincome pic.twitter.com/yUJr0azbKv

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS Challenges: Balancing Realpolitik and responsible investment: Elizabeth M. Carey warns of the perils of an ESG echo chamber as countries outside the West continue to invest in fossil fuels. Anyone working with the LGPS probably feels[...] dlvr.it/RtjMpq pic.twitter.com/MykIYxuYri

    Room151 6 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 6 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 6 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 1 week ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 1 week ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Councils face £500m bill after ATM business rates ruling
  • Next story Council reserves in shock rise

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.