• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO

    August 18, 2022

  • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system

    August 18, 2022

  • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant

    August 17, 2022

  • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’

    August 16, 2022

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Central bank communications may be less obvious than they seem

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan
  • — 29 Jul, 2013

jb-banner-grey

Over the months ahead, the statements made – and not made – by central banks can be expected to have material influence on market sentiment and asset pricing, and with this in mind, it’s interesting to look back on the conduct of the Bank of Japan during the early and mid 2000s, when Japan grappled with the sort of debt-deflation and growth deficit problems that face many developed economies today.

Back then, and perhaps with the benefit of hindsight, we could argue that the Bank of Japan’s Quantitative Easing (QE) policy was not really intended directly, or managed, to create or to ‘print’ money to any significant extent.  Instead, the QE policy was designed primarily to provide guidance on the likely (long) duration of the zero interest rate policy that had been put in place.  By committing themselves to a programme of QE, the central bank was in effect announcing that they could not raise interest rates for practical reasons until the QE ended.

Hence, in 2005 when the Bank of Japan started to signal that the QE policy would likely be discontinued from March 2006 onward, the markets and in particular the banks’ investment departments were given a date from which short term interest rates could theoretically rise.  This then led to a change of behaviour by the commercial banks, particularly with regard to their own activities within the bond markets, and the key point is that for all the chattering over so-called printing money, quantitative easing episodes in Japan, before ‘Abe-nomics’ were only really ‘signalling tools’ used by the central bank to help set interest rate expectations within the private sector.

In the US today, their QE3 may have been working much more as a ‘printing press’ form of QE than its predecessors in title, but nevertheless it also has had a signalling role.  However, by indicating that the outlook for QE3 and by extension the prospect of tapering is data dependent, Mr Bernanke has, unwittingly or otherwise, compromised this signalling role and the certainty that it had provided with regard to the future trend in interest rates. That the signalling role of QE has been compromised can be discerned by looking at the behaviour of the US commercial banks, which were once major buyers of Treasury bonds along with the Federal Reserve Board, and are now ongoing sellers, thereby undermining the effect of the current QE on both the liquidity and the trend of bond market pricing already.

This raises an interesting set of questions.

First, we ought to decide if we think that Mr Bernanke would have been aware of what his comments would do. Of course it’s possible that he wouldn’t and wasn’t, but this seems scarcely credible given his experience, let alone the legion of highly qualified and very experienced staff at the Federal Reserve.

So the second question is, just assuming that he was aware of what would likely happen, whether Mr Bernanke really intended to draw QE to a close, without actually having to do so formally. This would seem consistent with the premise that he would have known what his words and actions would deliver, and it would then follow that the Fed had become increasingly concerned with regard to the unintended consequences for markets from QE3.

As for the real world consequences, whilst Mr Bernanke remains publicly committed to QE3, and can continue with it, and indeed any withdrawal from QE3 may be premature notwithstanding the distortions it has created, we can conclude that in a very practical sense, exit from QE3 is already underway.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • Investing today: nowhere to hide 20th May, 2022
  • Impact Awards: Shortlist revealed 2nd Jun, 2021
  • LGPS webinar: Central bank management of bond purchasing could affect all asset classes 1st Mar, 2021
  • Stewardship of public funds: the way forward 18th Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO
    • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system
    • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant
    • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’
    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 8 hours ago

    Liverpool faces further government intervention as commissioners find ‘whole-council failure’: The levelling up secretary has announced that he is “minded to” expand intervention at Liverpool City Council by transferring the authority’s financial… dlvr.it/SWvgGc pic.twitter.com/cB7YeHZ9lE

    Room151 1 day ago

    Recovery position: withholding tax and the LGPS: Partner Content: Paul Sprenger from WTax talks to Room151 about how Local Government Pension Scheme funds could be missing out on millions of pounds of withholding tax recovery opportunities.… dlvr.it/SWsTfQ pic.twitter.com/z6aVMcaqHe

    Room151 1 day ago

    Treasurer societies favour permanent extension to IFRS 9 statutory override: Two treasurer society presidents have indicated their preference for the current five-year IFRS 9 statutory override to be made permanent following the government’s latest… dlvr.it/SWr3G4 pic.twitter.com/MGf9M5zC8Q

    Room151 2 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. A report by Dev Gopal, director of finance, revenues[...] dlvr.it/SWmynD pic.twitter.com/ETDd7sQA48

    Room151 2 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. room151.co.uk/funding/luton-… pic.twitter.com/XvyTZckW6m

    Room151 1 week ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 week ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Procurement, GPC, Carbon fund, Newport loans, Innovation & cuts, LAMS, Mutuals, Wolves
  • Next story Finnegan’s Take: Co-op alarm bells sound all too familiar

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares