• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

‘Coffee can portfolio’: Investing with Chinese characteristics

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPS
  • — 15 Jul, 2021

Photo by Kayla Kozlowski on Unsplash

Sponsored article: Frank Ding looks at the pros and cons of a “buy and forget” approach to investment in China

Robert Kirby, the veteran investment guru from Capital Group, first introduced the idea of a “coffee can portfolio” in the Journal of Portfolio Management in 1984.

CCP refers to a “buy and forget” approach of investing in shares of consistently performing companies and holding them for at least a decade or longer. The story behind the CCP traces its roots back to the time of American Old West when people would secure their valuables by putting them in a coffee can. The coffee can was then placed under their mattress for safe-keeping, where it stayed for years or decades.

Kirby’s story highlighted how one of his clients did better than his own portfolio by secretly using all of Kirby’s buy recommendations but ignoring his sell recommendations. This client would put around $5,000 into each stock that Kirby bought, and then put the stock certificate in the “coffee can” and never touched it again.


16 November 2021
London Stock Exchange or ONLINE
Room 151’s LGPS Investment Forum
Our annual gathering of administering authorities of the LGPS, their investment pools and advisers.
Qualifying local government investment officers can register here.



Upon his death, his wife asked Kirby to evaluate the portfolio and he found that while some holdings in the can were worth less than $2,000, several were worth over $100,000, and one jumbo stock (Xerox) was worth over $800,000 (160x on a $5,000 initial investment)!

Key Takeaways

The CCP approach was designed to help you think about what will become of the companies in five to ten years, as opposed to next year or the year after, which is the time frame for most investors.

  1. You make fewer decisions. Higher effort and activity do not necessarily lead to good results in the investment world. Focusing only on fewer buy decisions, you remove the obsession of trading, likely reducing investment mistakes. For long-term investors, doing less can leave them with more.
  2. CCP can reduce transaction costs substantially. It is important to not churn the portfolio. Kirby’s primary thesis said that investors lose a lot of money in transaction costs.
    “Professional money management today is sophisticated trading, rather than investment. We leave a major piece of the total investment return on the table in the form of transaction costs”, said Kirby.
  3. Select great companies and ride on winners generating multi-bagger returns. Buying and holding a poor-quality stock for long-term can certainly lead to wealth destruction.

CCP approach incentivises us to think about companies with a durable business model that are likely to maintain their strong competitive position, sustain greater earning power and thus generate much greater value. We believe filling up the coffee can with these quality companies will generate outsized returns in five to ten years’ time.

Do CCP principles work in China investment?

Yes and no.

No, if you were an early China investor. The first twenty years of reform (1978-2000) created few long-term investment opportunities. Very few companies available to investors during this period had generated large multi-year investment returns.

Yes, if you have invested since 2000 after China joined the WTO and the economic reform program made major progresses. Over the past 20 years, the reforms have nurtured a large number of great Chinese companies mostly from the private sector. They have demonstrated they can survive, thrive and grow their businesses in difficult conditions.

Companies that are able to adapt and grow in tough time of crisis often emerge as industry leaders that become great long-term investments.

Nevertheless, China’s markets are still developing and that CCP investment will have certain Chinese characteristics:

  1. China’s economy is still in transition. There are many policies and systemic risks which may disrupt industries and pose threats to individual companies.
  2. China’s economy grows three times faster than the developed economies. A superior investment return can be achieved faster than the decade-plus CCP from developed economies.
  3. China equities have a higher volatility and therefore active management, particularly on managing policy and systemic market risks, is still needed.
    China, akin to other emerging markets, often sees volatility amplified given its less efficient and retail trading driven market.

However, as China now makes up nearly 20% of the world GDP growth and growing at least three times faster than the rest of the world, any short-term market rout/volatility would prove to be an excellent time for investment especially for long-term investors.

Frank Ding is chief investment officer at FountainCap Research & Investment (Hong Kong) Co., LTD.

Photo by Kayla Kozlowski on Unsplash

—————

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Room151 Linkedin Community
Join here

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • David Green: Lessons from Germany’s Greensill debacle 22nd Mar, 2021
  • Levelling up and the LGPS 16th Feb, 2022
  • What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds? 24th Feb, 2021
  • The climate-impact: Why are green house gas emissions so important to LGPS? 21st Jul, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 19 hours ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 19 hours ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 20 hours ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 1 day ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 2 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 2 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 2 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 3 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 1 week ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 1 week ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story MPs demand “urgent” action to repair local government audit
  • Next story David Green: CIPFA ‘softens edges’ of the new Prudential Code

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares