• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Council tax support: from bad to worse

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Blogs
  • — 17 Oct, 2012

Agent 151 is a senior local authority finance director and S151 officer. The agent writes exclusively for Room151 and is licensed to speak candidly. 

The latest move by the government to offer a share of £100m funding to councils whose council tax support scheme meets a never-previously-discussed set of criteria compounds a series of bad decisions.  Here’s a reminder of the decisions so far:

  • The government discounted the obvious solution of including council tax benefit replacement with Universal Credit.  The result of this is a benefit system that will not be universal.
  • The government decided to make a 10% cut in the funding that would be passed to councils.  This meant that councils would either have to pass on the cut to claimants or to make cuts in other services to residents to fund the gap.
  • Perhaps in an attempt to soften the blow, the government decided to offer councils the freedom to design their own council tax support scheme.  The result is that there are now hundreds of schemes being consulted upon, each slightly different to the next, and this has meant that there has been lots of entirely unnecessary duplication of time and effort.
  • The government has failed to deliver the detailed regulations and guidance in time to allow councils to prepare in the way they would have wished.  Because of software development timescales, the best that could be achieved is a tweaking of the existing system.
  • It might be argued that a political response by Labour-controlled councils that involved passing on the cut to claimants and blaming the government was entirely predictable.

And now the latest decision, in response to the policy of some councils to pass on the cut to claimants, is to offer a share of £100m as a one off transition payment to councils whose schemes meet certain criteria.  The criteria are:

  • Claimants on 100% support under current arrangements  pay no more than 8.5% of their council tax liability
  • The taper rate does not increase above 25%
  • No sharp reduction for those entering work,
  • No large increases in non-dependant deductions, and
  • Councils should avoid schemes that require them to collect small payments.

This is, in a nutshell, too little, too late.  For one thing, if councils have already planned to pass on the increase, a share of the £100m will not be nearly enough to fill the budget gap that would be created by reversing that decision in order to meet the new criteria.  For another, if councils, having completed their consultation, respond to the government announcement by fundamentally changing their scheme, I can’t help wondering whether they run the risk of judicial review on the basis that the consultation was flawed.

I also feel obliged to point out a contradiction inherent in the criteria.  Cap the council tax payable to 8.5% of the total bill, but don’t create small payments that have to be enforced?  Councils have shown time and time again that they are good at adapting to change, but now we are being asked to perform the impossible!

For these reasons, I expect most councils that have already consulted upon a scheme that passes on the cut to ignore this latest offer.  Of course, the political spin will be that these councils have cynically passed on the pain to claimants when they didn’t have to.  But in light of the litany of errors I have described above, these councils will have plenty to say in return!

Share

You may also like...

  • Andrew Hardingham: Holidays await but the ‘in’ box is brimming over 17th Aug, 2021
  • ‘Unknowns’ linger in social care calculations 29th Sep, 2021
  • Councils & carbon: COP26 an opportunity to confront climate change at a local level 28th Oct, 2021
  • Three regulatory risk challenges for treasury managers 31st Jan, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 3 days ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 3 days ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 3 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 4 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 4 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 4 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 4 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 5 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Economic and market briefing: the week ahead
  • Next story Self-build projects earmarked for funding

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares