• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Ealing’s Ian O’Donnell on the future of the National Fraud Initiative

0
  • by Ian O'Donnell
  • in Blogs · Ian O'Donnell
  • — 2 Aug, 2012

Ian O’Donnell is Executive Director of Corporate Resources at Ealing Council

The government is consulting on the draft Local Audit Bill in the wake of its decision to do away with the Audit Commission.  One question is what to do with the National Fraud Initiative (NFI), which the Audit Commission has been running since 1996.  The NFI matches data provided by councils with data from a variety of other sources and returns the matches to councils for investigation.  An example of a successful match might be a full time council employee also found to be claiming housing benefit elsewhere.  Over the years the NFI has expanded its client list to include health bodies and even the private sector.

Councils fund the service and see it as a useful tool in the fight against fraud.  However, the service is not optional for councils, as the Audit Commission is empowered under the Audit Commission Act 1998 to demand the data.  The Audit Commission has been very effective in ensuring that action has been taken on the matches, making use of its role as external auditor to monitor progress.  In the financial year  2010/11 the NFI claimed it helped trace £275 million in fraud, error and overpayments across the UK.

Continuing the service is viewed as an important strand in local government’s strategy for fighting fraud, as set out in the document Fighting Fraud Locally, published earlier this year by the National Fraud Authority.  The problem of how this can be achieved has fallen to the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), the Audit Commission’s owner. In search of a solution, DCLG has invited other government departments to pitch for ownership of the NFI and the associated powers.  It should be no surprise that the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has made a bid, given its stated ambition to provide a government wide single fraud investigation service. However, councils fear that DWP’s focus on benefits would lead to the NFI narrowing its activities. The National Fraud Authority has also stated an interest, offering to set up a stakeholder-led independent board to govern the operation.  The National Fraud Authority is due to become part of the new National Crime Agency, providing links into wider crime fighting initiatives in the public and private sector.  It is understood that DCLG had been ready to announce its decision – a compromise involving shared ownership, despite councils having clearly stated a preference for the National Fraud Authority’s solution – when a third, surprise bidder emerged: the Cabinet Office.

Cabinet Office’s motives for wanting NFI are unknown.  Francis Maude has shown much interest in fighting fraud since taking up his ministerial role, setting up a Fraud, Error and Debt Task Force to advance the agenda across government. However, the Cabinet Office is not an operational arm of government, and does not have strong connections with local government, so it is not well positioned to take on such a transactional service.  Some council finance directors have expressed a fear that behind the move there may be an unrealistic expectation of savings from counter fraud activity.

No doubt the Cabinet Office’s mysterious plans for the NFI will emerge shortly.  In the meantime, it would be difficult for local government to back anything other than the option it previously preferred: the National Fraud Authority’s offer.

The consultation on the draft Local Audit Bill runs until 31st August 2012.

———————————————————————————————————————————————–
The Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum September 25th, 2012, London Stock Exchange
———————————————————————————————————————————————–

Share

You may also like...

  • Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and short duration 25th Feb, 2021
  • Good LGPS risk management is ‘living in the past, present and future’ 13th Dec, 2021
  • Avoiding the ‘flaw of averages’ in your LGPS actuarial valuation 5th Oct, 2021
  • MBA develops ESG bond framework 28th Jan, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 8 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 8 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Base rates and balance sheets: where next for ECB and BofE?
  • Next story Jackie Shute on the risk management road map

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares