• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

European Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive: the key issues

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan
  • — 27 Sep, 2013

jb-banner-grey

At the 5th Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum last week, topics that came up in discussion were the proposed European Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) and European banking union.

Looking back at the global financial crisis in Euroland, fear of contagion and the lack of loss-absorbing capital in the banking system forced political co-operation of a sort, and there was no bail-in of senior bank debt and no sovereign defaults. Looking forward, the proposed European BRRD is supposed to change this, and senior debt of a failing or likely to fail institution is going to be ‘bail-in-able’ and subordinate to depositors and other liabilities.

The good news is that many large European banks have been able to increase their capital cushion through retained earnings or private capital raisings, but the weaker part of the European banking sector, the medium-sized institutions that were not able to increase their capital and whose un-provisioned doubtful loans could be exposed in the planned Asset Quality Review by the ECB and the EBA stress tests, are likely to be subject of a political debate at the European level. We may expect that any country (including Germany) will want to be in charge of deciding the closure of any of its second tier banks, and an issue therefore is whether a national state should be allowed by the EC to provide the missing capital. In the case of (peripheral) countries which don’t have the funding to do this, the problem of legacy assets will likely arise again, and the extent to which losses will be paid for through capital from a common resolution fund or the ESM, will be subject to intense political debate.

Banking union as an over-arching issue will have significant impacts on financial markets in the years ahead, and given the conflict between national and European interests, several outcomes are possible with tough negotiations likely. As a particular point, Germany’s position after their election will be important.

In terms of the key issues, the proposed building blocks of a banking union contain both the so-called Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) and the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM). Whilst the SSM has just passed the European Parliament, there are still fierce political debates taking place about the SRM and problematically the two pillars are interlinked. The ECB’s Asset Quality Review and the EBA’s stress test are supposed to increase financial market confidence and this implies that problems will be surfaced but whilst the ECB wants an SRM in place before reviews are conducted, the current proposal by the EC is to have it ready if and when needed. In addition, the scope to cover potential capital shortfalls from joint European funds currently seems limited, due to core European backtracking. The SRM seems more likely to take the form of coordinated but separate national resolution funds and the ESM’s direct recap potential also has been truncated.

Without an explicit common backstop in place, the exposure of large recapitalisation needs could be very risky, but doing nothing is no alternative, as un-provisioned non-performing loans are clogging up bank balance sheets, preventing investment in the real economy and slowing growth. The ECB will be uncomfortable with the lack of progress from European governments and for Germany, there are two reasons why the currently proposed SRM is not desirable. First, transfer of sovereignty that a common resolution represents may be unconstitutional for Germany. Secondly, it is hard to justify the use of taxpayer funds to bailout foreign banks which haven’t written down legacy assets. In consequence we may expect Germany to push for solving legacy asset problems with bail-in creditors, then recourse to national recovery and resolution funds, and only draw on ESM funds if all else fails.

Compromise is likely with limited and conditional commitments, that would allow strong banks to recapitalise in the private market and weak (small) ones through idiosyncratic (i.e., not worrying for the markets) bail-ins or wind- downs. For the success of the exercise it will, however, be necessary for systemically (or politically) important banks to be saved with the respective sovereign needing to step in and provide capital if required. Only if the sovereign was not able to provide sufficient capital itself, would Europe assist.

One implication for markets is that the higher the mutualisation of bank resolution costs, both in the future as well as with regards to so called legacy assets, the better for peripheral sovereign spreads, and all other things being equal, the worse, for core European spreads. This is because the higher the degree of bail-in, the weaker the connection between banks and their domestic sovereign should be, and the more this is forced, (i.e., national bailouts made impossible), the more this also applies to weaker banks in financially stronger countries. Against this backcloth, we may see tightening of sovereign spreads (particularly in the periphery) and a widening of respective bank spreads (particularly in the core).

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • Harbord and Shute join the Room151 blog team Harbord and Shute join the Room151 blog team 19 Sep, 2012
  • Making sense of the current market, and a perspective of the Kay challenges Making sense of the current market, and a perspective of the Kay challenges 2 May, 2012
  • How councils can use modular homes to speed up housebuilding How councils can use modular homes to speed up housebuilding 9 Sep, 2019
  • James Bevan: China the big risk to growth in 2015 James Bevan: China the big risk to growth in 2015 5 Jan, 2015

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 3 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 3 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 3 days ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 3 days ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 3 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 4 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Landsbanki Payment, New Homes Bonus, Suffolk Councils Team Up, Wales Budget, Council Charging
  • Next story Overhaul in health funding requires stakeholder solidarity

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.