• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Graham Liddell: How to make a great shared service

0
  • by Graham Liddell
  • in Blogs · Resources · Technical
  • — 2 May, 2018

Photo (cropped): Mohamed Hassan, Pixabay

Recent events have cast doubt over the future of shared services for local authorities. Graham Liddell argues they can still provide valuable benefits — if managed well.

It’s less than a year ago since the Tri-Borough collapsed and the Northamptonshire Best Value Inspection Report had some harsh words to say about the role of LGSS. Is this the beginning of the end of the shared service?

Of course it isn’t. Many shared services are well established and delivering improved service levels, economies of scale and greater resilience for their customers. So, what do you need to do to create a successful shared service?

Based on my personal experience and very unscientific analysis, I think there are three preconditions for success:

  • Being crystal clear as to why you are entering into a shared service
  • Building trust
  • Providing clear leadership and creating capacity*
    * I know that providing clear leadership and creating capacity are really two conditions, but I spent quite a lot of time coming up with this nice triangle diagram (see below) which shows what happens when you don’t pay enough attention to one of a set of three. So please bear with me and read on: it will all make sense in the end.

‘Three’ preconditions for shared service success

Condition 1: Articulating why

It’s a pretty fundamental question: Why do you want to create a shared service in the first place?

My shared service journey started as head of internal audit at Brighton & Hove. And for me, it was clear that by working in partnership with other local authorities, my authority would benefit because our staff would be able to deliver more effective audits.

We would keep our understanding of the culture and control environment of Brighton & Hove and develop further our knowledge, experience and skills by working with, and at, our partners. Understanding the why enabled us to articulate:

  • Our purpose (focussed very clearly on the needs of the local authority).
  • What made the shared service option better than the alternatives (in this case outsourcing or going it alone).

Articulating “why” might not appear that challenging, but I wouldn’t underestimate its importance. It’s about creating a common purpose that will guide everything from the overall shape of your service to your day to day decisions.

And in articulating why, there are two lessons I would like to share:

  • It might be obvious, but if we are trying to develop a common purpose, the whole team needs to be able to contribute.
  • If your “why” isn’t focussed around the needs of your customer, start again. If you are trying to create a shared service finance function, there isn’t much point investing all that time and energy to create one that doesn’t help its customers manage its finances.

Condition 2: Building trust

So, we have agreed a well-crafted and clearly articulated common purpose for our shared service. The trouble is that our key stakeholders (even those involved in developing the “why”) may not be as enthusiastic as we might expect.

  • Members are typically suspicious about sharing control with other local authorities, particularly those with different political outlooks.
  • The officer leadership team may feel that they will lose access to support staff they have come to rely upon.
  • You can expect a whole range of anxieties from teams joining the shared service. Staff will inevitably be anxious about job security, but less obvious issues can have a big impact. Here are some snippets of conversations I have overheard:

—I don’t want to do things their way.
—They’re are a funny lot over there.
—I used to work with Bob, he’s a nice bloke but…

To these concerns we need to add the inevitability of things going wrong and (because we are working across more than one organisation) endless opportunities for misunderstanding and misinformation.

These are fundamentally issues about people and so our first line of defence is to work hard at developing relationships across the partners to build and maintain trust. This isn’t something that happens by osmosis. It’s something that leaders need to keep high on their agenda. There are a myriad of tools at your disposal, here are three.

  • The best way of getting people to work together is (very simply) to get them to work together. There will be lots of opportunities (for both members and officers) to collaborate and learn from each other. Create as many of these as you can.
  • Mind your language. Maintaining an awareness of the words we use is a great way to challenge attitudes. Dropping in a judicious “we” or “our” can help to build a sense of partnership. But possessive pronouns are dangerous. Frequent use of “them” or “us” in the wrong context can start to build barriers. Look out for inappropriate use of language and root it out. How about a swear jar?
  • Experiment and fail fast. The shared service will need to experiment to find new ways of working. Success should always be celebrated but how we deal with failures is possibly more important. Failing fast means putting a stop to failing experiments as soon as it becomes clear that they are failing, learning the lessons and celebrating the courage of the innovation. Above all, avoid the long-lingering death of a doomed initiative followed by an attempt to find someone to blame.

Condition 3: Leadership and capacity

The first two preconditions are about setting direction and making sure that everybody up for the challenge of working in partnership.

But developing a shared service is a complex project where each partner has different starting positions and expects to have a say on any changes. The project can easily grind to a halt under the sheer weight of work and the intricacies of decision making.

Providing clear leadership and addressing capacity are critical to making sure that a complex project doesn’t become overwhelming. Here are some issues to look out for.

  • Your teams will look to their head of service to provide clear and unambiguous leadership. The trouble is that each of the prospective partners will have their own heads of service, each of whom may be vying for this role in the shared service. This will need to be resolved sooner rather than later and will often require some difficult choices. Ultimately, though, there can only be one leader.
  • One of the advantages of bringing together teams from different local authorities is that they can design a new way of working that takes the best from each. If we do this right, there is an opportunity to create capacity by developing processes that manage demand, are more streamlined, automated and focused on the needs of customers. The risk is, however, that by being over-cautious we compromise so much that we end up with each of the old processes layered on top of each other. The role of the leadership is to empower teams to make brave decisions that will create capacity.
  • Don’t forget the that usual rules of managing projects apply:

—Get hold of a good project manager. They are worth their weight in gold.
—Don’t try to do everything at once. This is a long-term project and you will need to plan out what you are going to tackle and when.
—Make sure you have sufficient resources to release people to work on the shared service project without compromising the day job.

And finally…

So three preconditions: articulating why, building trust and leadership/capacity. If I had to choose which is the most important, it would be building trust. The shared service will be built by people taking leaps of faith to work for a common good. If they trust each other, they can work together on the other two.

Graham Liddell is head of finance (Technology and Process Improvement) for the Orbis Partnership.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • The opportunity in the renewables and grid support market as UK looks to ‘build back better’ 3rd Mar, 2021
  • LGPS funding adequacy: Is 150% the new 100%? 14th Dec, 2021
  • GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling 8th Feb, 2021
  • Richard Harbord: ‘Effective governance’ the key to commercial activity 17th Aug, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Agent151: Exploding some myths concerning management consultants
  • Next story Election campaign targets inter-authority lending

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares