• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Introducing Agent 151: Is council tax thinking on the money?

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Blogs
  • — 23 Aug, 2012

Agent 151 is a senior local authority finance director and S151 officer. The agent writes exclusively for Room151 and is licensed to speak candidly.  

Like many of you, I have a draft report on my desk that will, from next year, remove many of the discounts and exemptions that are currently available to certain council tax payers. Those with second homes, those whose properties fall empty, and those undertaking major structural repairs will all be worse off. I’m also about to conclude consultation on a new council tax support scheme to replace council tax benefit from 1st April 2013 that reduces the amounts that can be claimed by some people.

Both of these projects are the result of government policy making rather than being local government led initiatives. Indeed, the changes are so new that regulations relating to each are yet to be laid, and there is the distinct whiff of policy-making in a hurry about them. They have been badged by some as evidence of Localism being put into practice. But I am left wondering whether the thinking behind these policies is consistent.

Some of the existing council tax discounts and exemptions have been at best pointless and at worst have reinforced unhelpful behaviour on the part of property owners.  The changes offer councils wider discretion, and that is to be welcomed.  Now we can use the council tax to help us get more homes occupied more quickly.  We can even introduce a premium on council tax when a property has been empty for more than two years.  The change also allows us to increase council tax income by taxing assets that are contributing no local social benefit and without increasing the headline council tax level. Hmmm… it’s starting to sound, dare I say it, rather clever!

On the other hand, the abolition of council tax benefit and the creation of council tax support, another form of discount, has had its critics.  Many of us said that as a means-tested benefit it should have become part of Universal Credit.  I know I did.  That was brushed aside, and now councils are scurrying about to get their council tax support schemes in place because there is no time to be more ‘joined up’.  The outcome will be hundreds of different and complex schemes that taxpayers will have no chance of understanding.  Many benefit recipients will have to make a payment of council tax for the first time, and this will lead to more recovery action being taken against people who have no ability to pay. Council tax collection levels will inevitably go down. Will councils have new flexibility to incentivise people into work and keep them there?  No. In fact, the only people that will be worse off under most of the new council tax support schemes will be the working poor. This is an example of a policy that is clever in a different way: a hospital pass of a funding cut that insulates the originator nicely from the negative fallout.

Perhaps councils should be flattered, as there does seem to be a blind faith inherent in the government thinking around council tax benefit: don’t worry because councils will make it work. We must hope that this faith will blossom into trust and that the Government will do more listening to councils. Perhaps then we will see more of the first kind of cleverness and a lot less of the second.

———————————————————————————————————————————————–
The Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum September 25th, 2012, London Stock Exchange
———————————————————————————————————————————————–

Share

You may also like...

  • David Green: Treasurers face a ‘future quite different from the past’ 20 Aug, 2020
  • Euroland update part 3: the stakes for Germany Euroland update part 3: the stakes for Germany 14 Feb, 2012
  • Exit payment cap: Implications for the LGPS 7 Oct, 2020
  • Spending Review 2013: the wolf comes a step closer to the local government door Spending Review 2013: the wolf comes a step closer to the local government door 27 Jun, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 2 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 3 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 3 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 3 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 4 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Investment guidance: are regional rules helping?
  • Next story Steve Bishop on savings, saboteurs & the magical ingredient to shared services

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.