• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment

    June 23, 2022

  • LGA: councils facing service and job cuts due to National Living Wage increase

    June 21, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Investment returns Vs principles: and the winner is…

0
  • by David Crum
  • in Blogs · David Crum · LGPS
  • — 22 Aug, 2012

Back to the real, post-Olympics, world now, which is such a shame, since it was great living in a bubble where the daily news was led with positive stories of athletic endeavours, national pride and unity, which really made you feel good. Being constantly in the mood to celebrate was fantastic and very uplifting, and wasn’t it so nice to have escaped from the normal ‘bad news’ approach to reporting. Oh well, I guess we all knew it couldn’t last.

Olympics aside, there have been two news stories in the last couple of weeks that were higher profile than most – the Pussy Riot trial in Russia, essentially dealing with freedom of expression, and the trial of Gu Kailai in China, for the murder of British businessman Neil Heywood. I expect most people will be familiar with each story, and so won’t spend time going over them – you can always go to the BBC website if you want to read more on each.

Why am I highlighting these in an LGPS investment blog? Simply because they serve to remind us of the significant political/reputational/societal issues and risks that can, and do, exist in some ‘emerging market’ countries – indeed, these two trials reflect poorly on two key ‘BRIC’ countries!

Would it be fair to say that such risks have been, to date, pretty much glossed over by the vast majority of mainstream institutional investors and their agents, investment managers, in the pursuit of investment opportunities? If so, the question I now pose is – is that the right approach to be taken by long term investors?

Over the years I’ve occasionally (in all honesty, not that often) thought about the conflict between securing a decent investment return for the pension scheme members, versus the various potential risks of making any investment – and for the most part, it hasn’t bothered me too much. Let’s take tobacco as an example. Well, I might have said – on the face of it people choose to smoke, and as a sector it generates a significant dividend yield – something which funds may find even more attractive if they enter a cashflow negative world, and they need investment income to pay benefits. So, as long as the tobacco companies governance standards are high, and they are not permitted to sell cigarettes to minors, and stay away from underhand advertising in developing markets, etc etc etc, tobacco shares seem a reasonable investment opportunity.

Most people will be familiar with the standard line, supported by court rulings to date, that scheme trustees primary concern is to try to secure decent investment returns on behalf of the scheme members, with all other considerations being secondary. I’m beginning to form the view that, in this new age of globalisation, this has been too narrow an interpretation of fiduciary duty, and that such a line of defence will not – and surely cannot – hold for that much longer.

As the globalisation effect on financial markets has progressed over the last 20 years, most LGPS schemes have overseen a corresponding expansion of the list of countries in which their agents invest on their behalf. However, how many schemes have considered the overall ‘appropriateness’ of some of the countries in which they now invest?

For example – most LGPS funds will have some exposure to emerging market equities, or indeed debt, either on a passive or actively managed basis. Here’s a list of the constituents of the MSCI Emerging Markets index, with each country’s corresponding rank from Transparency International’s 2011 Corruption Perceptions Index*. The BRIC countries are highlighted:

COUNTRY

SCORE

RANK (of 183)

COUNTRY

SCORE

RANK (of 183)

Brazil

3.8

73

Morocco

3.4

=80

Chile

7.2

22

Peru

3.4

=80

China

3.6

75

Philippines

2.6

129

Colombia

3.4

=80

Poland

5.5

41

Czech Republic

4.4

57

Russia

2.4

143

Egypt

2.9

112

South Africa

4.1

64

Hungary

4.6

54

South Korea

5.4

43

India

3.1

95

Taiwan

6.1

32

Indonesia

3.0

=100

Thailand

3.4

=80

Malaysia

5.4

60

Turkey

4.2

51

Mexico

3.0

=100

*The Corruption Perceptions Index ranks countries/territories based on how corrupt their public sector is perceived to be. A country/territory’s score indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 – 10, where 0 means that a country is perceived as highly corrupt and 10 means that a country is perceived as very clean. A country’s rank indicates its position relative to the other 183 countries/territories included in the index.

As can be seen from the information in the table, Brazil has a marginally less corrupt public sector than China, which has a marginally less corrupt public sector than India, which has a marginally less corrupt public sector than Russia, which has a pretty corrupt public sector. The public sector, by definition, is run from the very top of the political structure in each country, and so what does that say about governance standards in investors’ supposed favourite emerging markets?

Are we all aware that, in seeking investment returns from across the globe, we seem to be unconditionally financially supporting some questionable regimes? What about the citizens of the developing nations around the world? Are their best interests served by this seemingly unconditional flow of capital into their respective countries? Are their living standards improving? And by that I don’t just mean with access to clean water, sanitation, healthcare, education etc…

Oh, just by way of comparison, here’s some familiar names:

COUNTRY

SCORE

RANK (of 183)

COUNTRY

SCORE

RANK (of 183)

UK

7.8

=16

France

7.0

=25

Ireland

7.5

19

Germany

8.0

=14

USA

7.1

24

Italy

3.9

69

Canada

8.7

10

New Zealand

9.5

1

There are of course other statistics and indices out there which measure the various components of each country’s ‘national character’, as it might be described. But does your fund, or your agents, make use of them, or indeed take them into account in any way? Is it defensible in the long term that public sector pension funds seek to make investment returns in overseas territories, regardless of how each country is governed? Regardless of how it treats its citizens? How much freedom it allows its press? How little it does to enshrine the rights of its citizens?

Is there an argument that we should collectively and individually put a bit more thought into where we invest our members’ hard earned and well deserved retirement assets, so that they have a decent income in retirement without negatively impacting the lives or destroying the rights of others, and feeding political corruption around the world?

Just a daydream? Many, I suspect, will say so.

Having reread this latest blog, some might say it comes across as ‘left leaning’, which may or may not be a bad thing, depending on your political persuasion. One good thing I’ve just thought of is that I won’t be put in prison for publicly criticising the UK for having the 167th most corrupt public sector in the world. Another good thing is that you won’t be put in prison for reading it.

David Crum spent 11 years working in the LGPS for the Lothian and Strathclyde Pension Funds, and 5 years as an investment consultant with Aon Hewitt. He is now the founding Director of 330 Consulting Limited

———————————————————————————————————————————————–
The Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum September 25th, 2012, London Stock Exchange
———————————————————————————————————————————————–

Share

You may also like...

  • Impact Awards: The winners are revealed 1st Jul, 2021
  • Reforming business rates payments for schools 19th Apr, 2021
  • Building back better? 27th Apr, 2021
  • ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades 23rd Feb, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
    • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase
    • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 6 days ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

    Room151 7 days ago

    Job Alert: Various Finance Roles: lnkd.in/eRKRvhJb pic.twitter.com/KkBrjXxAYD

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP on capital loans: a step in the right direction: David Green says the latest government proposals on Minimum Revenue Provision should be welcomed by local authorities. There are still some unintended consequences, but the suggested approach for… dlvr.it/SSZ7JK pic.twitter.com/M1W9qVgYWN

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP U-turn welcomed but ‘unintended consequences remain’: Local authority finance directors and treasury advisers have welcomed the government’s revised Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) proposals, while pointing out that some unintended consequences still… dlvr.it/SSWvY0 pic.twitter.com/sGglpVNFs3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’: The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. Mike O’Donnell told… dlvr.it/SSWvWV pic.twitter.com/rE1NjbMCCq

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’:The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. @London_CIV room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    JOB ALERT: Watford Borough Council & Three Rivers District Council, various roles:       Technical Accountant Career Grade: We are looking for a motivated team player to join our Finance Department. The post holder will gain experience across these… dlvr.it/SSWN8f

    Room151 1 week ago

    Inflation and the LGPS: Local government pension payments will rise significantly next year based on the inflation rate this September. William Bourne discusses whether funds should be looking for some protection by turning to[...] dlvr.it/SSVK9x pic.twitter.com/7zH9OkRo1d

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Sector’s David Whelan steps into Room151
  • Next story Investment guidance: are regional rules helping?

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK