• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Jonathan Bunt: LGPS pools could ‘add value’ by investing in housing assets

0
  • by Jonathan Bunt
  • in Blogs · LGPS
  • — 17 Oct, 2017

Photo: Pixabay, CC0

Why did LGPS funds recently turn down the opportunity to invest in housing assets? Jonathan Bunt argues this is an area where pools could offer real value, if they can learn to move quickly and put the right mandates in place.

In recent years, there has been an absence of good quality index linked products and, as a result, those that are available are very expensive.  The demand for such instruments from funds has driven up the price and driven down the value they offer. Similarly, I have recently read a number of articles in the housing press about the attractiveness of housing assets to investors for their predictable real returns.

It is against that backdrop that we recently offered a range of funds an—albeit relatively small—long-term, housing-backed investment with a direct inflation link, to which we received a very mixed response.


Register for the Room151 LGPS Quarterly Briefing


The large city institutions took an immediate and serious interest understanding the nature of the investment and competed to become preferred bidder.  This was reflected in their pricing with offers in the range that will enable the local authority sitting behind the deal to beat the  Public Works Loan Board rates over the same period.

By contrast, the same investment opportunity received little, or no, interest from the local government pension scheme funds that were approached.  The small number of funds that gave it some consideration priced it very significantly higher than the city institutions and were, therefore, never a realistic contender.

LGPS questions

This type of index linked product fits squarely in to an LGPS portfolio as a matching asset offering a real return which, based on the offers from the large city funds, meets common actuarial assumptions. The questions that therefore followed were why LGPS funds were not interested, or competitive, plus what does that mean for the planned pools for the future?

For smaller funds, the limited capacity on pensions investments results in a restricted ability to analyse and evaluate opportunities that are directly presented. In such roles, where pensions may only be part of a role, to have the time to consider such ad hoc proposals is challenging.

In larger funds, where there is greater investment capacity, other issues were flagged. For some, whilst being very experienced managing certain types of investments, this was a different product and one they did not immediately recognise. Accordingly, one of two things then occurred.

Firstly, the knowledge, understanding and experience of the indexed linked market was missing and the fund either did not know how to price it, or priced it way off the institutional investors. Alternatively, the offer was viewed as a property investment rather than an alternative form of indexed linked credit and it was therefore scrutinised in the wrong light leading to incorrect pricing assumptions. The final issue that arose was that the governance of (many of) the funds was such that it could not even attempt a decision in the approximate one month timeframe that the process was working to.

The offer was also discussed with one of the pools and this was a very positive conversation. The gathering of investment professionals in a single place enabled a much more focussed debate on how it would fit in to an LGPS portfolio and offered indicative pricing in line with the market.  The issue for the pool was that it had no mandate for such a product as they had not been instructed by the individual funds to consider it at this point.

As a local authority finance director I was always relatively neutral about pools but it is clear to me that here is an area where they can add real value. The challenge for a pool will be to get in to a position quickly where it can gather mandates from the funds and have the authority to place investments directly. To do this successfully, pools will need to ensure it can replicate, or better, the skills, knowledge and processes of an institutional investor and respond with their agility to opportunities. Most local authorities would be much happier to seek funding on the sorts of terms that we have been able to achieve from LGPS schemes but to do so, the pools and the funds have to become market normative.

 

 

Share

You may also like...

  • Avoiding the ‘flaw of averages’ in your LGPS actuarial valuation 5th Oct, 2021
  • Despite a commitment of billions, social care funding is ‘not solved’ 21st Sep, 2021
  • Local authority bonds: Do they hold the answer to housing? 22nd Apr, 2021
  • 2021 outlook: Knowns and unknowns after a tumultuous year 13th Jan, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
    • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase
    • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 17 mins ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 17 mins ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 4 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 6 days ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

    Room151 1 week ago

    Job Alert: Various Finance Roles: lnkd.in/eRKRvhJb pic.twitter.com/KkBrjXxAYD

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP on capital loans: a step in the right direction: David Green says the latest government proposals on Minimum Revenue Provision should be welcomed by local authorities. There are still some unintended consequences, but the suggested approach for… dlvr.it/SSZ7JK pic.twitter.com/M1W9qVgYWN

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP U-turn welcomed but ‘unintended consequences remain’: Local authority finance directors and treasury advisers have welcomed the government’s revised Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) proposals, while pointing out that some unintended consequences still… dlvr.it/SSWvY0 pic.twitter.com/sGglpVNFs3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’: The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. Mike O’Donnell told… dlvr.it/SSWvWV pic.twitter.com/rE1NjbMCCq

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story LGPS Pools Roundup: Brunel appointments, mandate for UBS, CFO for Central, credit fund launch
  • Next story Bob Swarup: The only certainty for investments is uncertainty

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares