• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Keeping everything on the straight and narrow: Aligning the interests of investors and private equity fund managers

0
  • by Editor
  • in 151 News · Blogs · LGPSi
  • — 28 Oct, 2018

Photo (cropped): rawpixel/Pixabay, CC0

Odi Lahav and Joanne Job from MJ Hudson Allenbridge explore what mechanisms can be used to ensure a closer alignment of interests between private equity investors and the investment managers they hire.

Odi Lahav

Private equity investors may argue the relative attractiveness of individual funds, managers and markets, but on this they are unanimous: managers (GPs) should not benefit before, or in spite of, their investors (LPs).

LPs entrust their capital to a GP for the long-term, based on the expectation that the investment thesis will remain valid over time, but also that their interests will remain aligned for the duration of that relationship.

Joanne Job

In private equity, alignment is essentially achieved via two mechanisms: (i) GPs committing their own money alongside investors (“skin-in-the-game”), and, (ii) GPs receiving a share of LP profits (“carried interest” or “carry”).

As highlighted in our recent report, [1] there are aspects of the manager-investor relationship where “alignment between the parties is not inherent”. In other words, the principal-agent problem is alive and well. Several mechanisms have evolved, however, to encourage closer alignment of interest between private equity fund manager and investor.

Carry/Carried Interest

Carried interest is the key feature of incentivisation in the remuneration for the GP’s efforts to maximise investor returns. This should filter down through the investment team in order to be an effective performance incentive. It should not be charged without an appropriate hurdle/preferred return.

Hurdle/Preferred Return

Without a preferred return, GPs can earn carry despite lacklustre performance. If the preferred return is set too high, however, GPs may be encouraged to engage in riskier deals than they ought to, or they might use more leverage than prudent. In private equity, preferred return levels are typically between 6 and 8% p.a.

GP Commitment

GPs and their senior investment staff are generally expected to make cash contributions to their own funds, in order to demonstrate their commitment to and belief in the investment strategy. Moreover, it is a further incentive to perform well: whereas carry provides pure upside for the GP, the GP commitment encourages the team not to lose any capital, either.

Traditionally, 1% of total fund size was considered an acceptable GP commitment, but our recently published research [2] has shown that the typical rate of GP commitment now sits north of 2%.

Management Fees

Management fees should cover all normal operational costs of a GP. They should not be a source of profit for the manager, but they can be.

GPs may charge fees on undrawn commitments, as well as invested capital. Whilst there may be pressure not to charge on undrawn commitments, this can create an unwanted incentive to make “any investment”, rather than a “good one”, in order to earn the management fee.

Other fees (e.g. transaction fees) may be charged by a GP to the fund, but the current industry standard is for these to be offset against management fees: per our survey, 90%+ of funds provide an offset of 100% of transaction fees.

There’s more…

Additional alignment considerations include:

  • Fund extensions – if the GP needs to extend the fund’s life, then management fees should be reduced or waived during the extension period.
  • Change of control – to ensure continuing alignment throughout the life of the fund, the team’s interest in the GP and the carried interest should be substantially locked-in for the fund’s tenure.
  • Distributions in specie: manager and investor interests may become misaligned in situations where there is a distribution of an investment in kind – in particular, where the securities/interests in such investments are not liquid. This may result in an overvaluation of carried interest as highlighted, again, in our recent research [3].
  • Successor funds: meaningful restrictions on the establishment of successor funds, can mitigate the risk that a manager’s focus may be drawn away from the current fund and can prevent excessive management fee generation.

Unlisted private equity funds are, by nature, illiquid. But this does not mean that LPs who find themselves misaligned have no options. With enough support, LPs can replace the GP for another manager (sometimes without cause) and the market for secondary fund interest sales is well-established. Still, better that it doesn’t come to that.

Sources:

  1. Private Equity Fund Terms Research – Part II of III – Alignment
  2. ibid
  3. ibid

Odi Lahav is the CEO of MJ Hudson Allenbridge, the Investment Advisory Division at MJ Hudson.

Joanne Job is a Managing Director and Head of Research at MJ Hudson Allenbridge.

Get the LGPS Quarterly Briefing

Share

You may also like...

  • LGPS – A success story LGPS – A success story 20 Sep, 2017
  • Triumph of common sense: unlocking dormant charity funds Triumph of common sense: unlocking dormant charity funds 26 Nov, 2018
  • Javid sends inspectors in to Northamptonshire Javid sends inspectors in to Northamptonshire 11 Jan, 2018
  • First LGPS pools get green light First LGPS pools get green light 24 Nov, 2016

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 21 hours ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 24 hours ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 2 days ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 3 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 3 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 1 week ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Disruptive technologies challenge traditional infrastructure approach
  • Next story It’s good to talk: engagement with Tier 3 employers in the LGPS

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK