• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

LGPS futures: An opportunity for greater financial efficiency

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPS
  • — 30 Jul, 2018

LGPS has done well. But Brexit, the 2020 funding settlement and actuarial valuations next year all present a challenge. Steve Simkins argues there are ways of preparing for the future.

It is fascinating that despite all of the major changes local authorities have been through in recent years, pension arrangements remain untouched.

This is not about getting rid of them — for many members these benefits are essential, and the scheme is an important recruitment and retention tool.

However, in many cases financial efficiency and ensuring the benefits meet the needs of the workforce have not been considered to the extent they have by many other employers.

There are opportunities to make significant revenue savings, cost and risk reductions, and there are various reasons why now is the right time to look at transforming the local authority pensions landscape.

“Rainy day”

Right now, the investment markets are strong. LGPS assets have performed well and, to use a football analogy, at the mid-point of the current valuation cycle most funds were effectively 2-0 up at half time. However, as Japan, England and others have painfully learned from the World Cup, the only score that counts is the one at full-time.

Thinking ahead to the next valuation we want to make sure we are winning and that might mean hedging out some risk temporarily as we enter a potentially choppy economic period.

Consider that the next LGPS valuation date is effectively the same date that the UK is scheduled to leave the EU. Secondly, 2020 is a crucial year in many respects as there is a degree of uncertainty over funding settlements. It is also when the contributions following the March 2019 actuarial valuation will kick in.

Finally the LGPS is not necessarily right for everyone, particularly the most senior and the lowest paid. It is possible that up to 20% of the workforce would prefer a lower cost, more flexible alternative given the chance.

The most significant benefits would come from the revenue savings which can be made from re-financing pension contributions. The contributions currently being paid by any council to the LGPS are calculated by the actuary to be a prudent amount — in other words, contributions are expected to be more than enough to provide the benefits over the long term.

There is effectively a “rainy day” fund being built up within the scheme. For some councils this is adequately funded through drawing down of reserves or cuts to services.

Landscape

The challenge we have addressed is whether cutting services or drawing on council reserves is necessary and we don’t think it is. It is possible to redesign the approach to pension contributions so that the prudent part of the contributions is taken out for the first three years.

Depending on the circumstances this could be around 25% of the current contributions. This is paid back if it is needed in year four. If it is needed, this payment is made through a long-term income stream (established at outset through the sale and leaseback of a property).

This does not change the ultimate funding target for the particular LGPS fund and allows a capital asset to support the revenue account. This innovative approach to pension contributions has the potential to free up a significant amount of cash which could be directed to services which may otherwise be cut.

Further, many councils consider alternative delivery models for services and where this model uses a subsidiary company it is possible to change the pension benefits offered to new staff joining this company, and this can often be the right commercial approach depending on the nature of the service.

This creates the possibility of establishing an alternative which could be opened up as an option to all council employees. This alternative could be designed to be lower cost (and risk) for the council and less expensive (and possibly more flexible) from the employees’ perspective.

The alternative need not even be a pension. For many staff, additional cash, savings options or assistance with debt may be more appropriate.

Making such an alternative available could empower staff to make choices in relation to their benefits. It could also give some staff — currently excluded from pensions provision because of the cost — something they value and so increase the motivation and even wellbeing of the workforce.

The landscape is shifting and utilising that change to increase the financial efficiency of local authority pensions and offer members a better deal needs to be top of the agenda.

Steve Simkins is a partner in the pensions practice at KPMG.

Share

You may also like...

  • The net-zero challenge for LGPS funds 7th Apr, 2022
  • Cryptocurrencies: Are they an asset class for LGPS funds? 6th Jul, 2021
  • Audit improves but problems and uncertainties remain 4th Nov, 2021
  • Bank of England battles inflation with latest interest rate rise 21st Mar, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 22 mins ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 23 hours ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 1 day ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 2 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 3 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 3 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 3 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

    Room151 3 days ago

    Room151 launches survey on IFRS 9 override and MRP impact: Room151 has launched a survey to gauge the sentiment in local government on two important issues: the IFRS 9 statutory override and the consultation on Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP). The[...] dlvr.it/SQ1VT7 pic.twitter.com/ahPEiLoFNC

    Room151 3 days ago

    Calling all #localgov treasurers and #s151 officers. Have your say in our IFRS9 and MRP survey room151.co.uk/treasury/room1…

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Time limited statutory override offers ‘postponement’ to impact of IFRS9
  • Next story Northants attempts to balance books as s151 letter reveals depth of crisis

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK