• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment

    June 23, 2022

  • LGA: councils facing service and job cuts due to National Living Wage increase

    June 21, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

LGPS governance during the pandemic: Keep calm and carry on governing

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPS
  • — 12 Jun, 2020

Without doubt the two aspects of managing the Local Government Pension Scheme which get the most attention are administration and investment.

Scheme members see the impact of good, or otherwise, administration every day. In the timeliness of processes, the response to their queries, the clarity of communication and most importantly the accuracy of their benefit payments, the effectiveness of administration is all too evident.

However, it’s investment that gets the real headlines. In a scheme with assets measured in the hundreds of billions that’s only to be expected. Whether it’s catching a cold due to market shifts, changing the behaviour of FTSE 100 companies or debating the value of infrastructure, investment gets the kind of attention and profile that administration can only dream of.

Shadows

In the debate around investment and administration the third aspect of LGPS management, governance, can be left somewhat left in the shadows.

Governance is sometimes perceived as the third wheel, or middle child, of the LGPS when perhaps a much better analogy would be the third leg of the (three legged) stool.

Good governance; transparent decision making based on diversity of thought, sound information and informed advice, is vital to the effective running of any pension scheme. It is especially so to the LGPS which, by its very nature as a statutory scheme, requires an additional aspect to its governance: democratic accountability.

So, how is LGPS governance standing up at a time when we can’t meet face to face in committee, when home working is the norm and when many of our usual protocols just don’t fit anymore?

To see what the answer might be the England and Wales Scheme Advisory Board (SAB) conducted a survey, in the first half of May, on governance in the LGPS across all three UK local government schemes. The survey included a variety of questions including governance meetings, decision making processes, liaison across asset pools, risk, investment strategies and budgets.

Information vacuums are inevitably filled, usually with misinformation, rumour and speculation. A response rate of over 80% avoids that vacuum, promotes a sensible informed conversation in the media and enables the SAB to effectively advise government and regulators. So firstly, a massive thank you to all who took the time to fill in the survey.

Cornerstones

Committee meetings are the cornerstone of local authority governance structures and the management of the LGPS function is no different. However, before we could even consider how to cope without being able to meet in the same room there was a regulatory hurdle to jump.

The snappily titled Local Authorities and Police and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and Police and Crime Panel Meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020 removed the legal requirement to hold meetings in person and thrust us into the virtual meeting space.

Over a quarter of respondents had already held a virtual meeting with another 61% planning to do so. The delay is to be expected given the need to plan and organise virtual meetings, but also normal committee cycles mean that some were not due until June or later.

The virtual experience varied both in terms of technology and format, but the vast majority deemed it a success. Lessons learned include practice beforehand, keep agendas focused, review protocols for the chair and make sure everyone has the papers in good time.

The LGPS asks a lot of its elected members in normal circumstances, doubly so in times such as this. However, their role is vital in ensuring the democratic accountability of the scheme. It is therefore encouraging to see that the vast majority of authorities have committed to virtual meetings.

Where alternative arrangements, such as delegations to chair or officers are in place, they are making use of existing urgent business protocols or are designed as temporary measures.

Since the survey was conducted there is mounting feedback indicating a growing frustration at both the variety of different video platforms and the ongoing debate around the security of some platforms. These issues are especially relevant in cross authority and multi organisation meetings, such as those within the asset pools and also when seeking to ensure public access to meetings.

However, the survey responses in these areas were positive and it is to be hoped that platform issues will be eased with experience of use and on-going systems development.

Revisions and risk

I have been asked on a few occasions if I am surprised that only 19% of responses indicated a revision to investment strategies. The short answer is no. In fact, those who have revised or are planning to (another 27%) would probably have done so anyway following the results of the 2019 valuation.

The LGPS is a long-term, strategic investor, I would therefore not expect to see immediate and significant revisions, to what are high-level, long-term strategies, as a result of sudden shifts in the market.

Greater focus is, in my view, correctly being brought to bear on risk. Over 90% of respondents said they have, or will, review their risk registers in light of the pandemic.

Interestingly, the survey indicated a split approach with some authorities creating a separate Covid-19 register, while others have incorporated it into existing registers.

Also encouraging is the indication that 90% see no issues with contractual service relationships with third parties together with a reasonable use of extensions to manage procurement arrangements.

A slight note of caution in the midst of positivity. Responses indicate that 87% are not planning to revise their administration or governance budgets.

I have no doubt that LGPS administering authorities are up to the task at hand, the survey has confirmed as much, but what waits for us on the other side of the pandemic is uncertain. There will be new ways of working and new challenges to face, all within a fragile financial environment (that could well see some authorities issuing 114 notices) not to mention the mounting backlog of regulatory change.

Leaving that concern aside the survey reflects a very encouraging picture of LGPS authorities adapting to and coping with the governance challenges of Covid-19—nobody appears to be panicking and governance is indeed carrying on.

Jeff Houston is board secretary at the Local Government Pension Scheme Advisory Board.

Share

You may also like...

  • Happy 10th Birthday to…us! 8th Nov, 2021
  • What’s in store for the LGPS in 2022? 7th Jan, 2022
  • Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond 30th Mar, 2021
  • ‘100 greener days in office’ 19th May, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • LGA: councils facing service and job cuts due to National Living Wage increase
    • London boroughs facing £400m extra pressure on budgets due to inflation
    • ICAEW: ‘ARGA needs more powers over local authority financial reporting’
    • Lambeth chief exec to join public sector consultancy
    • Councils given £15.5m funding to help implement social care reforms
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 3 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 5 days ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

    Room151 6 days ago

    Job Alert: Various Finance Roles: lnkd.in/eRKRvhJb pic.twitter.com/KkBrjXxAYD

    Room151 6 days ago

    MRP on capital loans: a step in the right direction: David Green says the latest government proposals on Minimum Revenue Provision should be welcomed by local authorities. There are still some unintended consequences, but the suggested approach for… dlvr.it/SSZ7JK pic.twitter.com/M1W9qVgYWN

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP U-turn welcomed but ‘unintended consequences remain’: Local authority finance directors and treasury advisers have welcomed the government’s revised Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) proposals, while pointing out that some unintended consequences still… dlvr.it/SSWvY0 pic.twitter.com/sGglpVNFs3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’: The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. Mike O’Donnell told… dlvr.it/SSWvWV pic.twitter.com/rE1NjbMCCq

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’:The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. @London_CIV room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    JOB ALERT: Watford Borough Council & Three Rivers District Council, various roles:       Technical Accountant Career Grade: We are looking for a motivated team player to join our Finance Department. The post holder will gain experience across these… dlvr.it/SSWN8f

    Room151 1 week ago

    Inflation and the LGPS: Local government pension payments will rise significantly next year based on the inflation rate this September. William Bourne discusses whether funds should be looking for some protection by turning to[...] dlvr.it/SSVK9x pic.twitter.com/7zH9OkRo1d

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story PWLB consultation: A ‘sledgehammer’ to the foundations of borrowing
  • Next story CFO fundamentals in a time of crisis

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares