• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

LGPS: Liabilities, regulatory pressure and de-risking

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · LGPS
  • — 18 Jul, 2016
William Bourne_2

William Bourne

The LGPS annual report reveals the scheme appears to be doing well. William Bourne digs below the surface to look at the effects of a distorted gilt yield curve, regulatory pressures and prospects for LGPS pooling.

The recently published LGPS annual report in many ways confirms how well the scheme is doing: asset growth has been around 8% annualised over 20 years, in line with that seen in the corporate sector; member numbers have grown by 3% to around 5.2million; and employer numbers by nearly 10%, largely as a result of the creation of academies.

Meanwhile, cash flow remains just positive; administration costs fell slightly in real terms, and from £20.75 to £18.68 on a per capita basis. The Scheme appears to be doing its job manfully, so what’s not to like?

Any answer must start with the liabilities. Despite the growth on the asset side, 30-year gilt yields have fallen by around 130bps in the three years since 2013, and long dated index linked real yields are sitting at -1.5%.

The swaps curve, used by private sector funds to hedge longer-dated liabilities has declined by more than 200bps over the same period.

As a result, the scheme’s aggregate funding level today would undoubtedly be lower than the 2013 level of 79% if the same actuarial methodologies were used.  The corporate sector, by comparison, was at 83%, albeit using a strict gilt yield discount rate methodology.

Distortions

In practice, for the 2016 valuation, there is an increasing recognition that the gilt yield curve is distorted, and increasingly inappropriate for an active and open scheme.

It is likely that the Government Actuarial Department, when it puts together an aggregate valuation of the scheme using standardised assumptions, will use an inflation based discount rate, as they do for unfunded public sector scheme liabilities. That would mitigate any sharp fall in the headline funding level number.

The report also highlights the different investment strategies being employed by private and public sectors. In March 2014, the private sector held around 47% of its nominal assets in fixed income compared to the LGPS’s 16%.

In practice, private sector exposure is probably more like 65% because of the use of derivative-based LDI strategies.

Since the financial crisis, both fixed income and equities have delivered good returns, and so returns have been similar, but it is hard to imagine a world where that continues.

If disinflationary trends remain dominant, bonds will perform well in the short term and equities less well, but this is not sustainable in the long term. If, on the other hand, inflation ends up being the mechanism through which the world’s indebtedness is reduced, equities may not flourish, but conventional bonds will certainly do much worse.

Pressures

The risk for the LGPS Scheme today is that regulatory pressure forces it down the path of de-risking just as the world shifts to a significantly less bond-friendly environment.

The quantitative easing (QE) experiment of the past eight years has done no more than prevent the global economy from collapsing.

Growth and inflation today are well below trend levels in all western countries, which makes reducing debt levels almost impossible.

Central banks are recognising that future QE has to involve putting money directly into the economy, and that increasingly means using fiscal policy in order to engender some growth and inflation.

In the UK, with a new government and in all probability a new chancellor, a policy shift in this direction would be helpful for all liability valuations, and less unhelpful for LGPS assets than for the private sector.

Pooling and infrastructure

In the short term, two of the LGPS pools are now FCA authorised and up and running, while the other six have mostly decided on what structure to use and are now looking at governance and how to operate the pool.

Some key issues have been identified: not every investment asset will fit neatly into a single structure; maintaining democratic accountability may be difficult if pools are to take the manager selection role and net cost savings are unlikely to be seen for at least five years.

However, given the short timeline prescribed, the progress made in the creation of pools is considerable.

The criterion to make it easier to invest in infrastructure is perhaps where there is least meeting of minds.

The government has over £400bn of projects to finance, but these largely involve construction risk (e.g. HS2) and do not match with the lower risk annuity-like streams into which most pension funds ideally wish to invest.

The solution to this could be either financing new construction projects itself and then selling the built projects on to investors, or mitigating the risk from the start.

Until now, Osborne’s rules have precluded the first, and there seems as yet little understanding on the second.

However, if as part of a relaxation of fiscal austerity as described above, the new government is willing to share the burden of financing new construction projects, that could suit it and pension funds alike.

William Bourne is an independent LGPS advisor at Nottinghamshire and East Sussex.

Share

You may also like...

  • Local government investment balances rise as PWLB borrowing falls 19th Mar, 2021
  • LGPS could be at “defining moment” for local infrastructure investment 29th Apr, 2021
  • Impact Awards: The winners are revealed 1st Jul, 2021
  • Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’ 9th May, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 12 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 12 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Councils continue search for returns despite interest rate cut delay
  • Next story James Bevan: QE to persist while the euro remains ‘suboptimal’

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares