• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Local authority trading: how to stay out of the twilight zone

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Resources
  • — 21 Aug, 2017

Local authorities have long had legal powers to trade in certain activities.

The increased need for financial self-reliance has propelled most local authorities to look at all sorts of trading activities in the hope of generating income.

Many services can be traded: commercial waste collection, parking, recreational and leisure services, consultancy, professional and technical services, some regulatory and licensing matters but not services that the council has a statutory duty to provide for free.

Most services can be sold at a modest profit to other public bodies.  However, for services where there is no specific power to charge (trade waste collection or municipal restaurants being examples of specific powers) then the council will need to rely on charging powers under s93 of the Local Government Act 2003 or if it wishes to add a profit margin then it will usually need to set up a company under the trading powers in section 95 or use its general power of competence for a commercial purpose under sections 1 and 4 of the Localism Act 2011.

Some local authority enterprises have enjoyed success, others have ignominiously failed and some live in a twilight zone where no one is sure whether they are successful or not because the true operational costs are buried within the overheads of their parent authority.

So what are the factors that influence success or failure?  What is going to happen to the undead enterprises living in the twilight zone- will they be reincarnated as thriving businesses or will anyone put a stake through their hearts?

Most local authorities run services so successfully that they are almost invisible to their consumers who take it utterly for granted that their needs will be met because the authorities have become so good at regulating demand and rationing resources.  However profitable businesses must not just have the humility to know why their customer chooses to buy or not from them, but also the confidence to know whether a customer is worth having.

The first step both legally and financially is to research and build a business case – this can be based on HM Treasury Green Book principles but also needs an injection of acumen to sniff out the over optimistic trading assumptions and how realistic it will be to effect a culture change so that the public service ethic becomes a passion to be the best at what you are selling.

From a legal as well as a financial viewpoint the business case needs to be rigorous in its forecast of overheads and identification of the true costs of running and supporting the business.

Otherwise, not only will the enterprise be condemned to live forever in the twilight zone but it becomes a sitting duck for a stake through the heart in the form of a state challenge (for which there is a 10 year limitation period), queries by auditors and members of the public in relation to the authority’s accounts not demonstrating a return on investment or to a political decision to wind up the business.  One should always remember that local authorities are the stewards of public funds and as such have a fiduciary duty under common law to ensure value for money, act in a business-like manner having regard to all relevant considerations (e.g. are we getting a return on our investment with this business) and disregard irrelevant considerations (I fancy setting this up because it will look good on my CV).

State aid arises whenever a public authority confers a benefit on an undertaking which has the effect or potential effect of distorting competition across the EU and if it is unlawful can result in clawback of the aid with mandatory interest and a fine on the local authority.

Employees will always be a key issue to address at the outset.  If a business has to carry the same overheads (salaries, benefits and pension contributions) as local government it is less likely to be able to be profitable in a crowded marketplace especially where the gig economy is beginning to prevail.  If the business is providing a premium service for which there is high demand then it can afford more generous remuneration.

However it is possible also to rationalise and modernise terms and conditions and remain a decent employer.  In fact members may have to accept that to get the right people to run the business they may need to be paid more than the Council’s Chief Executive!

Economic, technical or organisational reasons entailing changes in the workforce can justify changes to terms and conditions where TUPE applies but do ensure an employment law specialist reviews your business case so that it does justify the changes, and do not inadvertently evidence other potential claims. Thought also needs to go into whether there is the potential for equal pay claims relying on comparisons between employees of the authority and the trading business as “associated employers”, before or after changes are made.  Early consideration of pension risks and an actuarial valuation will also prevent drifting into the twilight zone.

Some local authority businesses take their main customer, their parent local authority for granted and neglect them in the thrill of the chase for new customers.  This demonstrates complete naïveté from a commercial and political viewpoint.  If the purpose of the enterprise is to generate income then you should cost up how much resources have to be used to chase and secure the new customer, whether the resources might not be better spent looking after your existing customers but most importantly whether the new customers will deliver the same or a higher profit margin.  As the saying goes, “turnover is vanity but profit is sanity”.

So a successful revenue-generating business will include motivated and appropriately remunerated people from top to bottom who are genuinely passionate about delivering a great product which outclasses their competitors, they will understand market forces, have undertaken rigorous analysis of their overheads and where profit can be achieved and a sound legal and financial foundation.

Helen Randall

Helen Randall is a partner at Trowers & Hamlins LLP.

Share

You may also like...

  • Controlling inflation: the conundrum for central banks 23rd Feb, 2022
  • Audit improves but problems and uncertainties remain 4th Nov, 2021
  • Is the Bank of England losing control of inflation and the yield curve? 28th Feb, 2022
  • A year in the life of an s151: ‘We delivered unbelievable things’ 16th Dec, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 6 hours ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 10 hours ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 1 day ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 1 week ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 1 week ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story News Roundup: Brexit bump, Bromley mandate, Salford bails out stadium, Basildon wins ERDF funding
  • Next story RBKC to tap reserves for Grenfell rehousing package

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares