• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Mrs Yellen and her testimony to Congress

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan
  • — 23 Jul, 2014

jb-banner-grey

Fed Chair Yellen used her semiannual Congressional testimony last week to present a defense of continued exceptionally easy monetary policy, yet the dovish rhetoric included acknowledgement of improved labor market data, the FOMC’s desire to form an exit strategy, and identification of pockets of financial excess.
As background, the Fed now seems closer to achieving its dual goals of price stability and maximum employment today than at any point since onset of the global financial crisis with jobs growth strong, unemployment falling quickly, inflation still below target with signs of bottoming, and whilst GDP growth faltered in Q1, recent indicators point to a rebound in Q2.
Against this backcloth, Mrs Yellen could have hinted that the need for ultra-easy monetary policy is nearing an end but instead she focused on “significant slack” remaining in the jobs market, “disappointing” housing activity, and the “false dawns” of the past, stating that the economic situation called for a continued “high degree of monetary policy accommodation.” The tone of her testimony conveyed no urgency to tighten rates and rather she expressed the need for caution during a recovery that “is not yet complete” and while the FOMC currently judge the risks for economic growth, unemployment and inflation to be “nearly balanced,” Mrs Yellen said they “warrant monitoring in the months ahead.”
Yet there was an adjustment in Mrs Yellen’s text from that of her 18th June post-FOMC press conference, acknowledging that the labour market is improving faster than policymakers expected (see appendix) and the FOMC’s record of forecasting has been poor, being too optimistic and on the way down, and generally too pessimistic on the recovery. If the data continue strong, the Fed may feel more confident in lessening some of its “exceptional” accommodation.
On the issue of excesses, zero interest rate policy for over five years has left the Fed in the difficult position of promoting risk taking while simultaneously trying to discourage formation of asset bubbles. Mrs Yellen explained that the Fed is monitoring financial conditions by looking at broad measures of leverage, the extent of maturity transformation and credit growth, and the behavior of broad equity indexes. In her testimony, Mrs Yellen argued that prices and valuation metrics of “real estate, equities, and corporate bonds…remain generally in line with historical norms,” and she currently does not see serious threats to financial stability – but Mrs Yellen identified pockets of concern in sectors “such as lower-rated corporate debt” adding “we are closely monitoring developments in the leveraged loan market and are working to enhance the effectiveness of our supervisory guidance.” The risk is that such stretched valuations expand and multiply, and while she made clear her preference to use macro-prudential policy rather than monetary policy to control financial excess, she noted that sustained low interest rates “could increase vulnerabilities in the financial system to adverse events.” Looking forward financial excesses could be one factor that drive the Fed to tighten policy.
It is clear that the Fed wants to avoid curtailing the US expansion with premature tightening, but Mrs Yellen and the FOMC will be aware that overly easy policy and excessive suppression of volatility can create risks of their own which could jeopardize the expansion’s longevity.
As to what lies ahead, we suspect that the stand-off between improving data and exceptionally accommodative policy will shift to more hawkish rhetoric later this year and an initial interest rate hike by late next year.
The onus on shifting rhetoric is because arguably the real challenge for the Fed is likely to be that when the time to raise rates does come, they will have difficulty in convincing markets that the goal is not to restrict growth with tight policy, but rather to begin normalizing financial conditions with policy more appropriate for recovering economic conditions. We will monitor Mrs Yellen’s statements for more clues on the policy agenda, and gauge market reactions to determine how the first rate hike will be taken when it does come.

Appendix

15th July 2014: “…the Committee’s decisions about the path of the federal funds rate remain dependent on our assessment of incoming information and the implications for the economic outlook. If the labor market continues to improve more quickly than anticipated by the Committee, resulting in faster convergence toward our dual objectives, then increases in the federal funds rate target likely would occur sooner and be more rapid than currently envisioned. Conversely, if economic performance is disappointing, then the future path of interest rates likely would be more accommodative than currently anticipated.”

18th June 2014: “Let me reiterate, however, that the Committee’s expectation for the path of the federal funds rate target is contingent on the economic outlook. If the economy proves to be stronger than anticipated by the Committee, resulting in a more rapid convergence of employment and inflation to the FOMC’s objectives, then increases in the federal funds rate target are likely to occur sooner and to be more rapid than currently envisaged. Conversely, if economic performance disappoints, resulting in larger and more persistent deviations from the Committee’s objectives, then increases in the federal funds rate target are likely to take place later and to be more gradual.”

Share

You may also like...

  • Stephen Fitzgerald: making a success of capital projects Stephen Fitzgerald: making a success of capital projects 8 Jun, 2016
  • Agent 151: FDs should back Cipfa resilience index Agent 151: FDs should back Cipfa resilience index 19 Aug, 2018
  • The ECB, the Euro and what’s being taken on trust The ECB, the Euro and what’s being taken on trust 29 Jan, 2013
  • Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place” 23 Feb, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 14 hours ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 1 day ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 1 day ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling: Day traders coordinating their efforts through the social media platform Reddit have not only boosted the stock of US GameStop, but also badly hurt hedge funds engaged in huge bets[...] dlvr.it/RsGdVV pic.twitter.com/NTMC3j6J2u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Room151 panel backs unitary councils and devolution: Bigger isn’t always better when it comes to local government, according to Sir Bob Kerslake, chair of the Peabody Trust, but “ …we need to move to unitary government and[...] dlvr.it/RsFPNv pic.twitter.com/lT4eCi0TmV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Lancashire to issue >£250m bond
  • Next story LGA casts doubt over pure passive LGPS

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.