• Home
  • About
  • 151 IMPACT AWARDS
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

Impact Awards –>
  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

NEW FEATURE: Ask the Auditor

0
  • by Graham Liddell
  • in Blogs · Graham Liddell
  • — 18 Jun, 2013

asktheauditor2
In the first instalment of our new, regular feature, Ask The Auditor, Graham Liddell from Grant Thornton UK LLP explains how he would deal with some of the hot topics facing local authority accountants today. To ask Graham a technical query of your own, email editor@room151.co.uk

A treasurer has asked “Why are my auditors telling me that I should provide for aftercare costs for our closed landfill site? What are the implications?”

Some local authorities are responsible for aftercare of closed landfill sites. Authorities generally budget for and charge these costs as service expenditure as the costs are incurred.

However, CIPFA’s Code of Accounting Practice requires authorities to:

  • provide for expected aftercare costs as soon as a landfill site comes into use
  • charge the costs to property, plant and equipment
  • depreciate the capitalised aftercare costs over the useful life of the site.

Closed landfill sites have reached the end of their useful lives. The capitalised aftercare costs should therefore have been fully depreciated and charged, via the movement in reserves statement, to the capital adjustment account. Most authorities will, however, have many years of aftercare costs left to pay on the closed sites and so should continue to recognise a provision on their balance sheets.

Under the capital financing regulations, authorities must charge a prudent amount to the general fund for the capitalised after care costs. We would expect authorities to do this as part of an increased minimum revenue provision (MRP). The simplest method, which avoids the need to rework budgets, is to charge an additional MRP equal to the aftercare costs an authority incurs each year. If an authority wishes to set aside funds before it incurs aftercare costs, it can do so by charging the general fund with a higher MRP.

There are two further practical implications to consider:

  • authorities may need professional advice to help estimate provisions for future aftercare costs
  • where authorities have not provided and capitalised aftercare costs, they will need to consider whether this represents  a material error in 2011/12 and so require a prior period adjustment.

A chief finance officer has asked “What treatment would you recommend in relation to the Municipal Mutual Insurance (MMI) shortfall?”

Many local authorities have received letters from the MMI scheme administrator explaining that they are required to pay back a proportion of the amounts received from MMI for claims settled in previous years:

  • this claw back applies to local authorities that are part of MMI’s scheme of arrangement
  • the initial levy has been set at 15% of specific settlements.

Many authorities have estimated a provision in their financial statements of  15% of the settlements. This is supported by the scheme administrator’s statement that the 15% initial levy is the mid-point of their estimate for the final amount. Some authorities have provided for 100% because this is more prudent. However, accounts should not be based on the concept of prudence: the Code requires provisions to be the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle an obligation, rather than a pessimistic estimate. If authorities wish to set aside funds over and above their best estimate provision, they can do this by creating an earmarked reserve via the movement in reserves statement.

Under CIPFA’s Service Reporting Code of Practice (SeRCOP), insurance cost are allocated or apportioned to the services to which they relate. We would expect, therefore, the cost relating to the claw back to be apportioned to services.

A finance officer has asked “Which disposal costs can be charged against capital receipts?”

The capital financing regulations in England and Wales allow local authorities to charge the costs of, or incidental to, disposals of land to capital. There is no definition of what this means in practice, so it is up to each authority to consider what is reasonable for a particular set of circumstances.

CIPFA’s Guide to Capital Finance provides examples of what might be allowable. These include:

  • advertising and legal costs
  • taxes
  • reasonable allocation of costs of support services (focusing on the marginal additional costs incurred).
  • CIPFA’s Guide also gives examples of costs relating to the disposal that would probably not be allowable:
  • deciding whether to pursue the disposal of an asset
  • relocating staff
  • scrutiny of the decision to dispose of the asset

Graham Liddell is Grant Thornton UK LLP’s national technical lead for the public sector.

No responsibility or liability is accepted by Grant Thornton UK LLP towards any person or organisation in respect of the use of, or reliance on, information contained in this column. For further information about Grant Thornton LLP’s work in the public sector, click here.

Share

You may also like...

  • Chris Buss: Councils need a ‘realistic’ increase in the HRA borrowing cap, not an ’empty gesture’ Chris Buss: Councils need a ‘realistic’ increase in the HRA borrowing cap, not an ’empty gesture’ 6 Dec, 2017
  • Corporate bonds: is it time you rethought your TMS? Corporate bonds: is it time you rethought your TMS? 4 Oct, 2012
  • Implications of Euroland recession Implications of Euroland recession 17 Nov, 2011
  • Credit booms and volatility Credit booms and volatility 17 Dec, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 16 hours ago

    Impact Awards: Liverpool’s cafe culture and Warrington’s investment in homes: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards showcase  finance teams with a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight Liverpool City Council’s… dlvr.it/RxJsKb pic.twitter.com/dEYpaz6HP0

    Room151 19 hours ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for housing or regeneration? Check out the 'Place Shaping' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @31tenConsulting in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !! pic.twitter.com/dU99vE6Wws

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for Adult Social Care & Health? Check out the ASC&H category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by Fundamentum Social Housing REIT in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    Doing something in #localgov #finance for the environment? Check out the 'carbon management' category room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… sponsored by @ACSLLP in the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards. #timetoenter !!

    Room151 2 days ago

    So what are the seven categories for the CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards? Here they are room151.co.uk/impact-awards/… #localgov #finance #outcomes

    Room151 2 days ago

    Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation?: The impact of the coronavirus pandemic, lockdown and wider economic uncertainty created  deflationary pressures which raise important considerations for the Local Government Pension Scheme writes… dlvr.it/RxF7Fs pic.twitter.com/JlcjROBIpz

    Room151 2 days ago

    JOB ALERT: LPFA Finance Director vacancy: London Pensions Fund Authority Finance Director and s151 Officer Competitive salary and benefits The largest Local Government Pension (LGPS) provider in London with around £6.5 billion of assets and 135[...] dlvr.it/RxBdJP

    Room151 3 days ago

    Richard Harbord: Further signs that local government finance is failing: The crisis in Liverpool and a fix for education budgets are further indication that local government finance is in need of a root and branch review. Even for those students[...] dlvr.it/Rx9PSV pic.twitter.com/sAanC2gEyu

    Room151 1 week ago

    Impact Awards: Finance helps launch school meals company and support business during lockdown: The CCLA/Room151 Impact Awards will showcase the way finance teams have a direct impact on their local communities and the environment. This week we spotlight… dlvr.it/RwnlF4 pic.twitter.com/AJhne1MVG4

    Room151 1 week ago

    "This work has made a vital, practical contribution to ensuring people have been supported through the pandemic." #impact #151awards #covid #s151 room151.co.uk/treasury/impac… #impactcasestudies #councilfinancemakesadifference

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ #passiton #localgov #s151 #151awards pic.twitter.com/A0uO0dwBkM

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Financial pressures loom for 2023 and beyond: Kate Ogden writes the government has addressed most of the short-term Covid-19 financial pressures facing English councils, but problems loom in 2022-23 and the years following. As we enter the[...] dlvr.it/RwfDsz pic.twitter.com/hpv2R09w75

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Calling all #localgov finance officers and #s151s room151.co.uk/impact-awards/ It's the #151Awards Thanks to the @LGALocalism for helping us get the word out along with all the LA treasury societies. pic.twitter.com/Nkal9BrH1J

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Lancashire’s Mike Jensen: the full interview
  • Next story 1994 again?

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.