• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment

    June 23, 2022

  • LGA: councils facing service and job cuts due to National Living Wage increase

    June 21, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Resident engagement: a powerful catalyst for financial change

0
  • by Steve Bishop
  • in Blogs · Resources · Steve Bishop
  • — 30 Aug, 2013

Steve Bishop is Strategic Director for South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse District Councils

One of the councils I work for, Vale of White Horse, has been dealing with cuts and tough budgeting decisions for what seems like a very long time. As part of that process we decided to go to the public five years ago – as many councils are still doing – and ask them how they would manage the council’s finances and what choices they would make, given the cuts we were faced with.

To do this effectively we invested in the SIMALTO software which enabled us to reach out to the public and survey them in a way that produced some quite unexpected and powerful results. The process involved fairly in depth doorstep interviews lasting over an hour, carried out by market research people who were able to capture a sophisticated set of data from each participant and feed it back to us to plug into the software. It’s not a cheap process but I’d argue it’s an effective one.

It was this qualitative methodology for collecting data that made the difference in my opinion and the usefulness of the results was routed in making sure residents understood the choices they were being asked to make. We gave each of them credits (instead of pounds) to spend on a list of local services and enabled them to see what they could effectively buy with a finite supply of credits.

You could opt for weekly waste disposal if that’s what you really valued as long as you were willing to cut elsewhere – grants, for example. Or, you could decide to increase your number of credits (by raising council tax) and afford a greater basket of services.

So you send people shopping (and who doesn’t love shopping?) and you say here’s your budget, what do you value? You can have more credits if you want but they have to come from somewhere and that somewhere in this case is council tax.

You need to get a statistically representative sample of people to take part in the survey so that you can then extrapolate some assumptions about how the general public would spend the local authority budget. That lets you see the areas that nobody is interested in where you might be spending money unnecessarily and other areas which everyone values where you could make some popular improvements.

The most unexpected result, typically, is that when you put some variation of council tax scenarios into the survey, so you offer more credits for buying services in exchange for a raise in council tax, most people will opt to raise their council tax. If you walk up to 100 people in the street and say ‘ should we raise council tax’, a 100 will most likely say no but if you ask them how they would personally allocate resource, in a sophisticated way, you start to get buy-in.

The final statistics that come back from the collated data go off to the councillors and they’re able to see an accurate ranking of services by their residents. From that you can start making decisions about what impact different cuts would have on resident satisfaction.

An important part of the process is to ask councillors how they would implement cuts, before you survey the public, so that you can see the difference in the two sets of results. In our experience the results were vastly different between the two groups and so for councillors, the ability to assess the public mood and revise their own assumptions about where to make cuts was highly educational, not to mention politically beneficial.

Another important aspect is quantifying the impact on customer (dis)satisfaction of each service change so that the (un-)popularity of any basket of service cuts/improvements can be estimated. This helps councillors refine their budget changes to minimise adverse public reaction.

Arguably, if you ever wanted to spend £100k (or whatever it is) on having a council tax referendum because you felt you needed to raise it by 5%, let’s say, then SIMALTO or similar systems could potentially help you deliver a yes vote if you could demonstrate that the majority of residents are in favour of enhanced services. Realistically though you’re only ever going to get negative publicity for raising council tax and in the age of austerity there’s no tougher sell. That’s probably why we’ve seen no council tax referendums!

So what are the financial benefits of running a survey like the one we did, where you take a representative survey and draw conclusions about budgeting from the results?

We’re here to deliver public services and a lack of money currently dictates that the delivery of services is going to have to change. In that context the best decisions are going to be the ones that are least painful to the public and the more people that are involved in making those tough decisions, the better and more popular those decisions are likely to be.

From a treasurer’s point of view, the least costly thing of all things is continuity and decisions that are supported to some extent by the public are less likely to be overhauled. Changes themselves, take redundancies for example, cost money to implement, but reversing decisions after you’ve got them wrong and the public kicks out the administration to vote the opposition in on a manifesto of undoing the changes made, is a treasurer’s worse nightmare. You’re then faced with another set of one off costs that could end up costing the council more money than it saved, even in the short-term.

Any involvement of the public should reduce the risk of costly flip-flopping where unsupported decisions are undone because there’s political capital to be made in reverting to the status quo.

Share

You may also like...

  • Don’t expect an infrastructure levy any time soon 21st Apr, 2022
  • Is the Bank of England losing control of inflation and the yield curve? 28th Feb, 2022
  • ‘Funding cuts have changed the scale, shape and scope of local government’ 31st Jan, 2022
  • ‘Chasing yield’ not the best strategy as negative rates loom 21st Jan, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as “disappointing”
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
    • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase
    • UK Infrastructure Bank launches plan to deploy £22bn of investment
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 6 days ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

    Room151 7 days ago

    Job Alert: Various Finance Roles: lnkd.in/eRKRvhJb pic.twitter.com/KkBrjXxAYD

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP on capital loans: a step in the right direction: David Green says the latest government proposals on Minimum Revenue Provision should be welcomed by local authorities. There are still some unintended consequences, but the suggested approach for… dlvr.it/SSZ7JK pic.twitter.com/M1W9qVgYWN

    Room151 1 week ago

    MRP U-turn welcomed but ‘unintended consequences remain’: Local authority finance directors and treasury advisers have welcomed the government’s revised Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) proposals, while pointing out that some unintended consequences still… dlvr.it/SSWvY0 pic.twitter.com/sGglpVNFs3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’: The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. Mike O’Donnell told… dlvr.it/SSWvWV pic.twitter.com/rE1NjbMCCq

    Room151 1 week ago

    Mike O’Donnell: ‘progress on LGPS asset pooling needs to go further and faster’:The CEO at the London CIV pension pool has called for progress on pooling the assets of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to accelerate. @London_CIV room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 1 week ago

    JOB ALERT: Watford Borough Council & Three Rivers District Council, various roles:       Technical Accountant Career Grade: We are looking for a motivated team player to join our Finance Department. The post holder will gain experience across these… dlvr.it/SSWN8f

    Room151 1 week ago

    Inflation and the LGPS: Local government pension payments will rise significantly next year based on the inflation rate this September. William Bourne discusses whether funds should be looking for some protection by turning to[...] dlvr.it/SSVK9x pic.twitter.com/7zH9OkRo1d

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Duncan Whitfield on financing frontline services
  • Next story What’s in a name?

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK