• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Responding to rising risk: the treasurer’s options

0
  • by David Green
  • in Blogs · David Green
  • — 17 May, 2012

With the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis dominating news headlines again, how should local authority treasurers respond to the rise in credit risk levels?  As I see it, there are three main options.

The first is to invest only in organisations that can’t go bust, such as the UK Government and other local authorities.  These safe havens don’t pay a lot of interest, from 0.25% in the Debt Management Account Deposit Facility to 0.85% in a five-year gilt, with local authorities paying no more than 1% higher.  But if security is your over-riding concern to the complete detriment of yield, then that might be OK.  Multilateral development banks like the European Investment Bank used to be considered safe havens too, although with their 5 year bonds trading at over 2%, some would consider them to be a riskier asset class these days.

The second strategy is to pick a number of low-risk commercial organisations to spread your money across, either those whose business model makes them less susceptible to economic conditions (utility companies and food retailers, for example), or those that are likely to be bailed out by the government in times of trouble (banks being the obvious ones).  Investing in companies is not always straightforward though, with settlement and custody expensive unless you can piggy-back on the pension fund custodian.  This leaves most local authorities looking at the fairly small number of banks with adequate credit ratings that accept sterling denominated deposits, and therefore failing to diversify adequately to hedge against the risk of government support not being available.  In trying to manage this risk, there is a tendency to stick to very short-term investments, and then the returns achieved are often no better than those available for longer periods in the very safest places.

So for many treasurers, the third way of external fund management is the winner.  Pooled funds, in particular, will give you much smaller exposures to a much wider range of counterparties, professional fund managers and credit analysts incentivised to act in your best interests, and the potential for the sponsor to step in and support the fund to prevent losses.  Banks will never pick up the phone to warn you they are going to default tomorrow and ask if you’d like to withdraw your deposit early, but money market fund managers will do everything in their power to preserve their net asset value at a constant £1 per share.  I know which one I’d prefer to be relying on.  The other great feature of money market funds is the fact that you have access to longer-term interest rates while retaining short-term notice to your cash.  This allows instant access funds to pay around 0.75% and longer dated funds to pay anywhere between 1% and 3% after fees have been deducted.  You would have to lock into gilts for 25 years to guarantee a 3% return.

As ever, no investment is guaranteed to be the perfect solution – if it was, the returns available would fall until equilibrium was reached – that’s market economics for you.  But if you apply the usual rules of keeping your eyes and ears open, and not putting all your eggs in one basket, you’ll be one step ahead of the investors sleepwalking into another crisis.

David Green is Head of Sterling Consultancy Services, a provider of treasury management advice to local authorities and other not for profit organisations.  This is the writer’s personal opinion and does not constitute investment advice.  It should not be relied upon when making investment decisions.

Share

You may also like...

  • Chris Buss: Is fair funding mission impossible? Chris Buss: Is fair funding mission impossible? 28 Feb, 2018
  • Mrs Yellen and her testimony to Congress Mrs Yellen and her testimony to Congress 23 Jul, 2014
  • Economic and market briefing: the week ahead Economic and market briefing: the week ahead 8 Oct, 2012
  • Economic & market briefing: the week ahead Economic & market briefing: the week ahead 10 Sep, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 3 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 3 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 4 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 4 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 4 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 5 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story LA treasurers weigh up corporate bonds
  • Next story Martin Hone on property rationalisation and being nimble

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.