• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding

    August 4, 2022

  • Oxfordshire councils abandon housing plan

    August 4, 2022

  • GLIL and Octopus invest £400m in world’s largest offshore wind farm

    August 3, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Richard Harbord: The local government settlement is a ‘fudge’ and a ‘muddle’

0
  • by Richard Harbord
  • in Blogs · Resources · Richard Harbord
  • — 19 Dec, 2016

The local government settlement saw changes to the New Homes Bonus and council tax to support adult social care. Richard Harbord argues it contained no new money and ‘no long-term thinking’.

richard_harbord 520

Richard Harbord

This year’s local government settlement was always going to be a bit different and perhaps promised a little less excitement than usual.

After all, 97% of all local authorities have signed up to a four-year settlement and this is year two of that deal. The statement confirmed the second year of the four-year settlement.

However, the statement from the communities secretary, Sajid Javid, came in the end with some controversy. Firstly, because it failed conform to the normal protocols of the House Of Commons. No advance copy of the statement was provided to the opposition prompting the speaker of the house, John Bercow, to consider suspending the sitting because of the omission. It would be my suggestion that this was not deliberate, but one caused by the statement being agreed politically at the last moment.

This was not the only controversy: the secretary of state claimed a large amount of new money in the settlement, but that is not at all apparent.

Business rate devolution

Javid started by saying that by 2020 there would be true “localism” in local government using local money to fund local services. Even this is slightly controversial but it depends on how you define local. If local is all local authorities, then that is true but it does not mean local self-sufficiency as many authorities will not be keeping 100% of their own business rates and there will be safety nets and equalisation.

The communities secretary forged ahead, confirming that a business rates bill will be introduced in the New Year. He also confirmed the 100% business rate retention pilots in London, Greater Manchester and the Liverpool city region will commence in 2017-18. He then added the West of England, Cornwall and the West Midlands. Those of us on the business rates steering group have yet to see the detail of how this will work, or what the effect will be on the rest of the country.

New Homes Bonus

He then moved to the New Homes Bonus. A system close to the heart of district and unitary councils. There will be changes.

Javid announced there would be no bonus paid beneath 0.4% growth, and unveiled a consultation on a proposal to withhold bonus from authorities “not planning effectively, by making positive decisions on planning applications and delivering housing growth”.

There is also a proposal that no New Homes Bonus is paid on homes built on appeal.  There will be consultation on that and a reduction in payment period from six to five years in 2017-18, and to four years in 2018-19. This comes at a difficult time and authorities will need to re-calculate their financial forecasts both for next year’s budget and their longer term financial plans.

Adult social care

Following intense discussions in the media, the settlement was keenly awaited for what it might say on adult social care. And the communities secretary offered a series of announcements.

The indicative allocations for the Better Care Fund were confirmed. This means that the hoped-for bringing forward of the money will not be happening.

The funds freed up by the changes to New Homes Bonus will form an adult social care grant. This is calculated at £240m for next year, distributed on relative need. Javid’s speech only gave a commitment to next year although the secretary of state did say savings in New Homes Bonus will be retained in full by local government.

He also allowed the bringing forward of the social care council tax precept to allow up to 3% next year and the year after.

The secretary of state then made the claim that this meant £900m additional funding for adult social care over the next two years.

In the House, he said this was “new money”. But it does not meet my definition of new money. The New Homes Bonus was already committed and will now be redistributed. Each authority will need to do its own calculations and it will be particularly interesting to see the overall position in unitary authorities. Clearly districts will lose and counties gain. The precept is flexible and it will still equate to 6% over 3 years. The speech says that 6% will be the limit up to 2019-20.

In other decisions the secretary of state noted the fair funding review was taking place and progress will be reported in the New Year. This is to determine the base for devolution of business rates. He also said the proposal to cap parish precepts has been deferred again for 12 months. This was originally raised when it was thought some districts were devolving services like leisure to parishes who had no constraint on their expenditure.

Muddle and fudge

Local authorities are not impressed. The extra precept is very little help, is uneven and will lead to accusations of a post code lottery in adult social care. The New Homes Bonus will be a worry for many authorities and there can be no certainty how that will finally effect them and their finances. Clearly, in total, it is recycled (not new) money. There will undoubtedly be significant losers who will not gain by way of additional funds for social care.

I also note that yet again there is no mention of children’s services, which is another major pressure point for authorities. An announcement about the direct schools grant will also adversely affect many authorities.

Another not very good day for local government. And not a very good day for central government because the settlement amounts to a fudge, a muddle and with no long-term thinking

Richard Harbord is the former chief executive of Boston Borough Council.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Investing today: nowhere to hide 20th May, 2022
  • Impact Awards: The winners are revealed 1st Jul, 2021
  • GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling 8th Feb, 2021
  • The risks of de-risking LGPS 12th Jul, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
    • Oxfordshire councils abandon housing plan
    • GLIL and Octopus invest £400m in world’s largest offshore wind farm
    • LGA: Right to Buy ‘becoming unsustainable’ due to increase in discounts
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 13 hours ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 14 hours ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 2 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 4 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 6 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 7 days ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 7 days ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

    Room151 1 week ago

    Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash: Dan Bates discusses the latest data on the publication of local authority accounts and examines why so many councils missed the 31 July deadline. Sunday 31 July 2022 was the[...] dlvr.it/SVx2ZT pic.twitter.com/gdELhD3Yis

    Room151 1 week ago

    DLUHC proposes devolution deal in York and North Yorkshire: The government has proposed a devolution deal for York and North Yorkshire, which it says will bring over £540m of investment to the areas over 30 years. The deal will[...] dlvr.it/SVvzPQ pic.twitter.com/JUKfgZB17f

    Room151 1 week ago

    DLUHC proposes devolution deal in York and North Yorkshire: The government has proposed a devolution deal for York and North Yorkshire, which it says will bring over £540m of investment to the areas over 30 years. room151.co.uk/151-news/dluhc… pic.twitter.com/bZEjB1JebO

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story News Round-up: LGPS £1bn infra fund, Javid warns 10 councils, BNY wins LPP admin mandate, CFO’s biggest pressure…
  • Next story David Green: MiFID II – deadline looms for action

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares