• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Safety, risk, T bonds & equities

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan
  • — 19 Mar, 2012

The US flow of funds data confirmed that in Q4 2011, foreign central banks began selling US Treasury bonds. Indeed, over the quarter, foreign central banks reduced their T bond and Agency debt holdings by $30bn (this is the actual data which is not seasonally adjusted or expressed at an annualised rate) but, despite this event, US Treasury bond prices rallied over the quarter. What made this rally even more interesting was that the Treasury issued $325bn of bonds over the quarter on the same unadjusted basis.

On the purchase side in the government bond markets, foreign private sector investors acquired $100bn, which may have reflected the appetite for perceived safety, and the remaining c$250bn of T bond ‘supply’, which by default had to be absorbed by the domestic private sector in the US, was accounted for by households, family offices and domestic hedge funds (only $4bn), the commercial banks ($34bn); pension funds ($20bn); mutual funds ($84bn) and the investment banks ($90bn).

In terms of the likely rationales behind these purchases, we can assume that the households (or more probably the family offices etc that are included within the household sector data) and mutual fund sectors were simply looking for a safe haven during the Euro Crisis. The commercial banks’ modest level of activity at that time probably represented a half-hearted and capital-constrained attempt to ride the yield curve but the $100bn of T bonds purchased by the investment banks over the quarter is perhaps the most difficult to explain. At first sight, this may have been risk aversion, but in order to finance their balance sheets and implicitly their T bond holdings, the investment banks still had to increase their level of repo borrowing and borrowing from their affiliated institutions and this could suggest a possible degree of increased risk appetite. Looking back on prior spikes in investment bank demand, such as Q3 2007 (immediately post-Lehman), during the LTCM Crisis, the beginning of the NASDAQ Bust, after 9-11, the deflation scare of 2003 and the 2004 corporate bond market ‘event’, it may be the extra demand for Treasuries reflected the demand of the investment banks’ own creditors. After all, during times of financial stress, the first thing that creditors or lenders within the internal workings of the financial system do is to cut their unsecured lending and instead demand collateral when they lend and, in a world in which the rating agencies have sharply reduced the supply of eligible collateral via their downgrades, Treasury bonds stand out relatively prominently as the collateral of choice. Hence, when the global financial system stumbles, we may not only see increased ‘safe haven flows’ into T bonds but also a sharp rise in the demand for T bonds for use as collateral by the investment banks and others.

However as bond prices rise, there becomes not only a valuation reason to switch back into risk assets but also potentially a greater supply of collateral within the system that can be mobilised in the event of lenders returning to the credit system. Therefore, with perceived ‘good news’, such as the ECB’s announcement of the LTROs, the financial markets are in a sense already primed to launch a substantial real and leveraged flow of funds back into the risk markets. Moreover, if the level of risk appetite increases sufficiently, some of the would-be leveraged investors may find that they still need to buy T bonds in order to guarantee their borrowings and this can act as a prop for bond prices in the short term, even as risk appetite returns to the markets.

This may be what was happening in the USA until recently. However, it is also true that as risk appetite returns, the requirements for collateral may soften and investors may also feel that they no longer need to hold assets in a safe haven. At this point, as the safe haven and collateral-related demand for bonds eases and bond prices may begin to fall sharply but, as yields rise, it is also true that risk assets will start to look relatively less attractive and the supply of collateral in the system that will be available during any new period of stress will also tend to fall.

There is some technical sensitivity of risk asset pricing to T bond yields and arguably if Treasury ten year yields were to breach 2.85%, then the equity market could begin to look expensive again.

As a tentative conclusion, there is a risk that if the current rise in global economic confidence results in a decline in the perceived need for safe havens and collateral in the system, then the rally in risk assets might strangely prove self limiting, just as Japan’s rallies did during the 1990s and early 2000s.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • Lessons from Ukraine: are defence exclusions ‘responsible’? 7th Mar, 2022
  • Local government: from funding famine to balanced diet 4th Apr, 2022
  • Impact Awards launch to celebrate finance teams 25th Mar, 2021
  • Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances 16th Feb, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 17 hours ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 2 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 2 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 3 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 3 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 4 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 4 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 4 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Gross or Net?
  • Next story Government backing needed to drive infrastructure investment

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares