• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • LGPS infrastructure partnership invests £1.8bn in renewables

    December 12, 2019

  • Brunel appoints global high alpha managers

    December 11, 2019

  • City of London completes £250m debt deal

    December 11, 2019

  • Mystery bidder appointed on £250m waste contract

    December 11, 2019

  • Investors withdraw from property fund

    December 11, 2019

  • Highland councillors back tourist tax

    December 11, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

Safety, risk, T bonds & equities

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan
  • — 19 Mar, 2012

The US flow of funds data confirmed that in Q4 2011, foreign central banks began selling US Treasury bonds. Indeed, over the quarter, foreign central banks reduced their T bond and Agency debt holdings by $30bn (this is the actual data which is not seasonally adjusted or expressed at an annualised rate) but, despite this event, US Treasury bond prices rallied over the quarter. What made this rally even more interesting was that the Treasury issued $325bn of bonds over the quarter on the same unadjusted basis.

On the purchase side in the government bond markets, foreign private sector investors acquired $100bn, which may have reflected the appetite for perceived safety, and the remaining c$250bn of T bond ‘supply’, which by default had to be absorbed by the domestic private sector in the US, was accounted for by households, family offices and domestic hedge funds (only $4bn), the commercial banks ($34bn); pension funds ($20bn); mutual funds ($84bn) and the investment banks ($90bn).

In terms of the likely rationales behind these purchases, we can assume that the households (or more probably the family offices etc that are included within the household sector data) and mutual fund sectors were simply looking for a safe haven during the Euro Crisis. The commercial banks’ modest level of activity at that time probably represented a half-hearted and capital-constrained attempt to ride the yield curve but the $100bn of T bonds purchased by the investment banks over the quarter is perhaps the most difficult to explain. At first sight, this may have been risk aversion, but in order to finance their balance sheets and implicitly their T bond holdings, the investment banks still had to increase their level of repo borrowing and borrowing from their affiliated institutions and this could suggest a possible degree of increased risk appetite. Looking back on prior spikes in investment bank demand, such as Q3 2007 (immediately post-Lehman), during the LTCM Crisis, the beginning of the NASDAQ Bust, after 9-11, the deflation scare of 2003 and the 2004 corporate bond market ‘event’, it may be the extra demand for Treasuries reflected the demand of the investment banks’ own creditors. After all, during times of financial stress, the first thing that creditors or lenders within the internal workings of the financial system do is to cut their unsecured lending and instead demand collateral when they lend and, in a world in which the rating agencies have sharply reduced the supply of eligible collateral via their downgrades, Treasury bonds stand out relatively prominently as the collateral of choice. Hence, when the global financial system stumbles, we may not only see increased ‘safe haven flows’ into T bonds but also a sharp rise in the demand for T bonds for use as collateral by the investment banks and others.

However as bond prices rise, there becomes not only a valuation reason to switch back into risk assets but also potentially a greater supply of collateral within the system that can be mobilised in the event of lenders returning to the credit system. Therefore, with perceived ‘good news’, such as the ECB’s announcement of the LTROs, the financial markets are in a sense already primed to launch a substantial real and leveraged flow of funds back into the risk markets. Moreover, if the level of risk appetite increases sufficiently, some of the would-be leveraged investors may find that they still need to buy T bonds in order to guarantee their borrowings and this can act as a prop for bond prices in the short term, even as risk appetite returns to the markets.

This may be what was happening in the USA until recently. However, it is also true that as risk appetite returns, the requirements for collateral may soften and investors may also feel that they no longer need to hold assets in a safe haven. At this point, as the safe haven and collateral-related demand for bonds eases and bond prices may begin to fall sharply but, as yields rise, it is also true that risk assets will start to look relatively less attractive and the supply of collateral in the system that will be available during any new period of stress will also tend to fall.

There is some technical sensitivity of risk asset pricing to T bond yields and arguably if Treasury ten year yields were to breach 2.85%, then the equity market could begin to look expensive again.

As a tentative conclusion, there is a risk that if the current rise in global economic confidence results in a decline in the perceived need for safe havens and collateral in the system, then the rally in risk assets might strangely prove self limiting, just as Japan’s rallies did during the 1990s and early 2000s.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • David Green: IFRS 9 checklist 30 Apr, 2019
  • The euro, brinkmanship and market distress The euro, brinkmanship and market distress 24 Nov, 2011
  • Euroland lurches towards fiscal union & recession Euroland lurches towards fiscal union & recession 16 Nov, 2011
  • Working with our hands tied Working with our hands tied 4 Dec, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Court rejects NHS trusts’ claim for millions in business rates relief: A judge yesterday threw out a claim by 17 NHS trusts that they are charities and should receive millions of pounds of business rates relief. Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation[...] dlvr.it/RL8F7D pic.twitter.com/fxt6Sor3Q7

    Room 151 3 days ago

    Authorities turn away from PWLB in favour of borrowing from peers: Councils borrowed just £80m through the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) during the first full month since the Treasury’s rate rise, a mere 4% of August’s total. Just two authorities[...] dlvr.it/RL8F57 pic.twitter.com/zIOf1KlNpc

    Room 151 4 days ago

    County introduces new rules after £9.1m funds gaffe: A report to Hertfordshire’s most recent audit committee meeting said the “treasury control failure” had come to light in August, one day after the multi-million-pound redemption was not received.… dlvr.it/RL5DP0 pic.twitter.com/6LvY71zUew

    Room 151 4 days ago

    News just in - #WorkingtonWoman is believed to represent roughly half the electorate in Workington.

    Room 151 5 days ago

    LGPS urged to put the ‘social’ back into ESG: LGPS committee members and managers have been asked to elevate the importance of the “S” in ESG (environmental, social and governance) to help protect workers’ rights as the world confronts[...] dlvr.it/RL1c9p pic.twitter.com/xv590d3qm8

    Room 151 5 days ago

    Room 151’s top 10 news stories of 2019 room151.co.uk/treasury/room-… #localgov

    Room 151 6 days ago

    Room 151’s top news stories of 2019: As an eventful year for local authority treasurers draws to a close, Room 151 takes a look at the top 10 stories from the sector during 2019. 10. Spending watchdog[...] dlvr.it/RKy49q

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Council files £130m claim against PFI contractor for post-Grenfell estate costs: London Borough of Camden is suing a former PFI partner and its main subcontractors for £130m for costs relating to the evacuation of one of its housing estates the week[...] dlvr.it/RKkR8C pic.twitter.com/zIfQcikMjq

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Review highlights ongoing financial management issues at Northamptonshire: Northamptonshire County Council’s new section 151 officer should draw up plans to repatriate powers from government commissioners amid ongoing problems with financial management,… dlvr.it/RKjLkN pic.twitter.com/tQIxMDawQV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Gross or Net?
  • Next story Government backing needed to drive infrastructure investment

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK