• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Low earners at Surrey County Council receive 7.85% pay increase

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Social housing for LGPS funds?

0
  • by David Crum
  • in Blogs · David Crum · LGPS
  • — 18 Jul, 2012

Time for blog two – this time, some thoughts on ‘local’ investment. As a topic, it does seem to be a no-brainer. I’m sure local authorities throughout the UK would love to see more social housing and inward business investment, development and support within their own geographic boundaries. Who co-ordinates and facilitates such activity – whether the main responsibility is with local or central government – is not knowledge that I possess, but additional housing and economic development must be very tempting options for administering authorities responsible for large multi-million pound pension funds which are always looking for new areas of investment.

Social housing is a subject that is close to my heart, since I grew up in it. Without it, I have no idea where my family would have lived. ‘Right to buy’ was a key policy of the Thatcher Government, tying in with the Conservatives free market approach, but the downside was a significant shortage in social housing stock, particularly the ‘good’ houses in the ‘nice’ areas.

According to the Communities and Local Government website, there were 1.8 million people on the housing waiting lists in England alone for 2011. Sobering stuff, brought more sharply into focus given that the traditional housing construction industry remains in the doldrums. So is there an opportunity here for LGPS funds?

Well there are a few steps worth considering before embarking on a ‘local’ route.

The first, in three related parts, is: what questions should be asked about the opportunity being considered, what is it going to deliver in terms of investment returns and where does it sit in the fund’s overall investment strategy? Unfortunately, how it might fit in to the wider social contract of the authority, and which parts of the administering authority’s geographic area will benefit are not key considerations – merely serendipitous outcomes.

The second is is which route do you take? Does a range of suitable investment products, in, say, social housing, exist? To my mind, the answer at the moment, sadly, is ‘no’ – but I’m always happy to be corrected. I’m certain that more LGPS funds would be interested in diversifying their investment strategies by adding something like social housing to the mix – as long as the investment returns are reasonable, and that it brings something new to the strategy in terms of risk reduction and/or return enhancement. One downside of social housing at the moment is that any current investment opportunities tend to be created for projects across the UK – which is good in terms of your diversification, but doesn’t tick the ‘local’ box.

The third is manager selection – a favourite topic of mine. All of the usual criteria apply when choosing an investment manager: quality of people involved, investment philosophy, and investment process being the main three. This, to my mind, has always been a sticking point in local regeneration and redevelopment. Opportunities that tend to crop up seem to be relatively small in scale and don’t justify the time required to run comprehensive due diligence.

At the end of the day, pensions have to be paid – but hopefully funding gaps will be closed more by investment returns in the coming years than by contributions. If local infrastructure, development or housing projects can help do that, as well as deliver for the greater good as a by-product, then options in this area shouldn’t be off the table. A clear and unconflicted process of appraisal and vetting is the solid foundation on which to consider such investment possibilities.

Oh, and not forgetting the need for the investment marketplace to come up with solutions that offer choice and allow making such investments a lot easier than it currently seems to be!

Share

You may also like...

  • The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk 13th Jan, 2021
  • FDs’ Summit experts defend councils as MPs label property investment ‘risky’ 22nd Jan, 2021
  • McCloud consultation ends with “greater security” for LGPS members 4th Mar, 2021
  • Why should LGPS be concerned about rising inflation? 8th Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 hour ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 1 hour ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Sheffield CEO calls for shift in attitude to risk
  • Next story Inter-authority exchange could save millions in brokerage fees

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares