• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Stephen Sheen: Something to be celebrated

0
  • by Guest
  • in Blogs · Technical
  • — 19 Aug, 2014

Stephen Sheen is the managing director of Ichabod’s Industries, a consultancy providing technical accounting support to local government. This article was be published in the fourth issue of Room151 Quarterly. 

In the last issue of Room151 magazine we looked at the future of local government audit and what it might mean for the relationship between authorities and their auditors.  All indications are that audit will continue to move away from being a public good and closer to a service provided exclusively to the authority.
If this is the case then authorities should be positioning themselves to ensure this service is provided as effectively as possible.  As we approach the end of the 2013/14 audit round, a timely area for focus will be maximising the benefit to the authority of auditor reporting.
The absence of any substantial readership for the Statement of Accounts of most authorities usually means that the audit opinion itself is not given much regard.  However, it is an item of great value.  It confirms that an independent and expert team has taken on your financial systems and accounting staff with sceptical intent and found them capable of producing a set of accounts that gives a true and fair view and complies with proper practices.  Something to be celebrated.
Even if the opinion is qualified, this is not necessarily bad news.  Most qualifications arise because of legitimate differences of view about accounting treatments, estimates or judgements.  The auditors disagree with you, but you may still have a defensible position.  Other qualifications can arise from lost accounting records, perhaps in a transfer to a new system, that having happened once will not happen again.  Currently a trip to the Audit Commission naughty step follows a qualification, via a mention in the annual Auditing the Accounts report.  But this is a relatively secluded spot which promises no great scandal.
Public interest reports?  These are the wolves that once prowled this land; legendarily savage but now seldom seen.  According to the Audit Commission website, only two PIRs have been issued to principal authorities in the last two years.  This is despite a statutory duty for auditors to consider whether they should report on any matter coming to their notice in the course of the audit so that it can be brought to the attention of the public.  Perhaps the auditors consider that Private Eye’s Rotten Boroughs column does a sufficiently insightful and objective job of informing the public about the probity of their local authorities?
The risk of being on the receiving end of a public interest report is consequently remote; a fact that should calm the fears of those concerned that auditors might lose their fearlessness if self-appointed by authorities.
Effective reporting for most authorities will then focus on the reports required by auditing standards on deficiencies in internal control and audit findings.
With regard to internal controls, auditing standards require auditors to report all deficiencies identified in the course of their work to management, and inform those charged with governance of the most significant deficiencies.  Reports have the tendency to look like a bad school report, scheduling out everything that has gone wrong.
But you should expect reports to be as constructive as possible.  Does it detail the scope of work where deficiencies were not found?  And are the deficiencies identified placed informatively within a description of the context in which they were found, an explanation of their possible practical consequences and an actionable recommendation as to how they might be addressed?
Reports of audit findings largely focus on errors and omissions in the Statement of Accounts and if not prepared carefully can look like a listing of the failings of the accountancy staff.  However, this is not what was intended by auditing standards.  Auditors are required to report any misstatements that they find and do have to request that management correct them.  Management is free to decline the request, but auditors then have to report uncorrected misstatements to those charged with governance.
The purpose of this, however, is to make members aware of the position, just in case they wish to disagree with management and the auditors that corrections are not needed for a true and fair view or can read some wider importance into the findings from their own knowledge and experience of the authority.  The report should therefore be nicely co-operative, making it clear that members are being asked for a third opinion on the uncorrected misstatements and not for expressions of regret at the failings of the finance function.  The report should be drafted to encourage a harmonious outcome, especially as the list is likely to lengthen as more and more immaterial disclosures are omitted as authorities cut clutter.

Share

You may also like...

  • 2021 outlook: Knowns and unknowns after a tumultuous year 13th Jan, 2021
  • Investing in infrastructure and real estate for solid returns 21st Oct, 2021
  • The opportunity in the renewables and grid support market as UK looks to ‘build back better’ 3rd Mar, 2021
  • LGPS investing: how impact funds can contribute to net-zero ambitions 15th Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Economic activity in the developed markets
  • Next story Steve Mason: Borrowing power

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares