• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Queen’s Speech confirms planning reforms

    May 10, 2022

  • 18,000 affordable houses lost through ‘permitted development’

    May 9, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Stephen Sheen: Wanted: a caring home for audit

0
  • by Stephen Sheen
  • in Blogs · Stephen Sheen
  • — 10 Feb, 2015

Stephen Sheen is the managing partner of Ichabod’s Industries, a consultancy providing technical support to local government.

The Audit Commission will vanish in a puff of smoke as midnight tolls on 1 April.  When the haze clears, will the commission have gone, leaving nothing but a sooty smudge on the wall to stir tales of the terrible beast that once haunted England?  Or will its spirit live on, wisps of its inspirational vapours filling the lungs of local government officers?

We can be assured that there will be at least one denizen of Westminster who will have a warm feeling come 1 April.  But should the rest of us be revelling or rueful?

In practical terms, there might not be a lot of change.  Most of the functions performed by the commission have been found what appear to be caring and responsible homes.  Provided the transition is smooth, things will continue to be done very much as before.  Sometimes even by the same people, just in different chairs.

Public Sector Audit Appointments Ltd has been incorporated by the LGA to take on the role of supervising auditor appointments and setting fees.  It will have the interesting job of managing authority and auditor expectations of the current bargain basement contracts.

The National Audit Office has drafted a new Code of Audit Practice and will have responsibility for other guidance to which auditors must have regard.  Their value for money studies will have a greater reach into local government.  The NAO’s chief, the comptroller and auditor general, will take the role of a prescribed person to whom whistleblowing disclosures can be made in respect of local authorities.

The Financial Reporting Council has the job of supervising recognised supervisory bodies, who will be authorised to confirm the eligibility of auditors for local audit appointments and keep a register of them.  The FRC will also have the primary responsibility for reviewing the quality of audits.

The commission’s fine work in countering fraud is to pass to the Cabinet Office, who will run the National Fraud Initiative data matching programme.  Counter-fraud work has transferred to CIPFA, hosted by the Counter Fraud Centre that was established in Summer 2014.

On the face of it, it would appear that the commission’s responsibilities have been scattered widely, as if each of the commission’s sister organisations had each felt obliged upon the event of this family tragedy to take in one of its orphan children.

On reflection, though, this dispersal might actually be a good thing.  Many of the things that the commission did were not particularly complementary and did not, by necessity, have to be carried out by the same organisation.  Separating them and passing them to different bodies, with different objectives, may lead to a more effective exercise of individual responsibilities.

For instance, the NAO may find itself freer to direct auditors in the conduct of their work if they are not concerned with the contentment of auditors as their contractors.  Public Sector Audit Appointments can concentrate with independence on auditor-authority relationships without having being muddied by detailed involvement in setting the parameters within which auditors work.

Each of the orphans appears to have found a loving foster parent.  The local government world won’t change significantly on 1 April (at least not for this reason).

But I would discourage any excessively celebratory mood.  There were moves before the final abolition of the commission which still cast shadows over the future of local audit, the darkest of which relate to the ending of a public audit service for local government.  The District Audit Service was swept up by the commission and then dropped into the laps of the successful firms in the outsourcing exercise.  There is small prospect that the public service ethos can survive the pressures within these firms to make money and not risk damage to one’s reputation.

Oh, alright – one small glass of champagne, then.  But then the graft begins to make sure that local audit works for the public interest.

Share

You may also like...

  • PFI, the end of LIBOR and the arrivel of SONIA 26th Oct, 2021
  • Impact Awards launch to celebrate finance teams 25th Mar, 2021
  • The net-zero challenge for LGPS funds 7th Apr, 2022
  • Richard Harbord: ‘Effective governance’ the key to commercial activity 17th Aug, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 17 hours ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 2 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 2 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 3 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 3 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 4 days ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

    Room151 4 days ago

    Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans analyses the rationale for the Bank of England’s latest rise in the Official Bank Rate and assesses the likely outcome of… dlvr.it/SQ33k3 pic.twitter.com/A81yiS1UgN

    Room151 4 days ago

    The Liability Benchmark, very much unloved at the recent Room151 treasury briefing, receives a much more positive assessment from Jackie Shute. There’s ‘no better tool for treasury portfolio management’, she says. #localgov #finance room151.co.uk/treasury/in-pr…

    Room151 4 days ago

    In praise of the Liability Benchmark: Jackie Shute responds to recent criticisms of the framework used to plan the future borrowing requirements of a local authority. I’m not suggesting that this debate will have the same[...] dlvr.it/SQ2cGf pic.twitter.com/4rqXTpHC9A

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story John Harrison: The future could be superfunds
  • Next story Jon Rowney: Resetting local government finance

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares