• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Steve Bishop: There are too many councils and we cost too much

0
  • by Steve Bishop
  • in Blogs · Resources · Steve Bishop
  • — 8 Dec, 2014

Steve Bishop is strategic director for South Oxfordshire and Vale of White Horse District Councils

UK local government costs too much. It costs way more than it needs to. That’s why we keep meeting our sector savings targets. And it’s why the government is sensible to keep demanding more. Because we cost far more than we need to. And why? Because there are far too many councils for what’s needed to deliver UK local government services in the 21st century.

There are 433 principal councils in the UK:
201 districts
55 English unitaries
36 mets
32 London boroughs
32 Scottish unitaries
27 counties
26 Northern Irish districts
22 Welsh unitaries

Think of the duplication across so many organisations. Duplicated property assets; duplicated business rates; duplicated chief execs, directors and managers; duplicated subscriptions; duplicated software licences. Not to mention the diseconomies of small scale in so many organisations procuring individually from the many local government supply chains.

In 2005 Sir Peter Gershon estimated this unnecessary and inefficient duplication across the UK cost the country billions each year. And despite central and local government assertions to the contrary, most of the costs remain.

It is no surprise that the few councils so far prepared to partner up and share people, overheads and assets find savings so easy. Not simply because they are innovative, brave and pioneering… but because there is so much waste to grab so easily.

This is no criticism of the 1974 design of local government. It is hard to imagine now, but back then a council computer was a rarity. Those lucky few that existed had the processing power of a modern coffee percolator and the vast majority of council services depended on paper-based systems. Paper required people, armies of clerks, recorded and maintained the card systems and ledgers needed to keep track of residents, tax payers, customers, suppliers; even paper records to maintain stock control of the paper.

With any paper-based system there are logistical limits to the number of records a single manual database and team could be expected to maintain accurately. Hence the need for hundreds of council tax registers in England alone, hundreds of electoral rolls, and therefore hundreds of councils.

But now, in the 21st century, after 30 years of the silicon revolution, with year-on-year exponential evolution in processing power and digital capacity, we could just about handle the nation’s council tax records and billing off a single electronic system. Certainly half a dozen systems could cope, not the hundreds we have. Indeed, think of the big outsourcing firms who already undertake much of the council tax work – each has a single system which copes with dozens of council clients. The same is true of our other local authority systems such as business rates and waste collection, even the sacred cows such as planning, housing and elections require far fewer than the wasteful numbers of databases we artificially spread them across now. Each one needing more staff than necessary to maintain and use them.

Not only has IT speed and storage capacity outpaced our archaic council structures, but there have been similar revolutions in workforce management. Remote working, home-working, mobile working, flexitime, shared staffing were all alien concepts back in the 1970s civil service. But all have become embedded in society and again require fewer numbers of employers to manage them.

Then there’s strategic thinking and regionalism. Few councils can now drop their gaze at their own borders. With local enterprise partnerships, city deals, devolved traffic policy and the joined up health agenda, councils are now “forced” to participate and collaborate in a dizzyingly complex web of partnerships. How bewildering and confusing is this web for us council workers – imagine trying to explain it to Joe Public? They’d think we’re mad – no wonder it’s “broken Britain”. And how many are effective with member organisations sharing completely aligned objectives? Very few, instead we waste time defending our little corners and arguing the toss.

I haven’t mentioned two-tier madness yet. I’ve spent most of my working life lecturing family members, and anyone sad enough to listen, on the difference between district services and county services. My dad and sisters don’t realise the apoplexy I’m on the verge of when they refer to “the council’s road department” in the same sentence as “the council’s benefit hitlers” – when they live in a two tier area! Our British citizens just don’t get the difference, after 40 years of trying. So let’s quit trying and give them what they want – the simple notion of “the council”, which in our jargon means unitaries. Which would also make massive savings. And would improve the effectiveness of those services that should never have been sundered – such as waste collection with waste treatment and disposal.

So, the solution to all this wasted public money and effort? It’s simple: rationalise the number of councils. Be businesslike. The private sector is not always right, but it wouldn’t stand for an artificially large number of suppliers in the market. It would aggregate the hordes of smaller suppliers into a fewer number of larger suppliers to reduce overheads and reduce unit cost. We need to do the same.

We need to design UK local government for 2014 society, taking account of the many advances there have been since 1974. At the very least match new unitaries to LEP boundaries – only 39 in England. Wipe out the wasteful duplication and save billions. It’s not rocket science, after all, even the government has grasped the solution – but is only applying it in Northern Ireland and Scotland prior to the general election.

And what about localism? Is the 21st century British public passionately engaged with local issues, local politics, local democratic accountability? Are the polling stations straining from the hordes of citizens desperate to exercise their local vote? No. The massively expensive democratic machinery, dating back to the late 1940s is also archaic and out of date. So, replace it. Accepting that democracy, expensive though it has to be, is still preferable to the alternatives, let’s just keep it proportionate to the mood of the masses. Apathy does not justify localism. So 39 councils and councillor structures at the most it is then.

Now, 8,500 parish councils? That just won’t do…

Photo (cropped) by Judit Klein

Share

You may also like...

  • GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling 8th Feb, 2021
  • Stephen Sheen: Audit predictions 2021 27th Jan, 2021
  • The development of CCLA’s mental health benchmark 12th Jan, 2021
  • Could 2021 be less eventful for LGPS, please? 3rd Mar, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Lancs and LPFA merge assets and could open door to other funds
  • Next story James Bevan: Optimism of the herd may be good news in the short term for investors

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares