• Home
  • About
  • Newsletters
  • Conference
  • TMS Links
  • Calendar
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Glasgow raises £195m in debt finance deal

    December 5, 2019

  • Bexley housing company scales back housing target

    December 5, 2019

  • Redbridge approves lottery plans

    December 5, 2019

  • Halton imposes freeze on non-essential spending

    December 5, 2019

  • FRC looks to increase control over auditors

    December 5, 2019

  • Legal & General invests £100m in Sunderland regeneration project

    November 28, 2019

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Jobs

US debt ceiling and the markets

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan
  • — 1 Oct, 2013

jb-banner-grey
The political headlines over the coming days will likely be all about the potential government shutdown as Washington deliberates on a short-term continuing resolution. While a shutdown seems to be a distinct possibility and might cause some volatility in markets, it should not in and of itself materially affect markets too much, and any effects should dissipate upon an agreement. That said, the inability to reach agreement on a short-term continuing resolution sends a worrying message, particularly with the far more dangerous spectre of the debt ceiling ahead. Without a debt ceiling agreement, it looks likely that the US government will run out of cash around October 24th.

With the market beginning to price yet another contentious US political battle, it’s interesting to focus on what happened to rates in the 2011 debt ceiling showdown, and we can reasonably expect that a protracted stand-off would result in similar moves in the front end, with cheapening of “at risk” Treasuries. The market seems to be starting early this time, as we have already seen a mid- to late-October bills sell-off and moderate inversion of the bill curve. Apart from that it’s very challenging to determine what the 2011 debt ceiling lessons might be for markets given that as political brinkmanship took Washington to the edge, Euroland break-up fears escalated, with Spanish and Italian borrowing costs rising substantially and there was also the looming threat of a ratings downgrade.

Arguably it was the threat that the peripheral sovereign debt crisis represented to Euroland stability that meant that investors’ appetite for Treasuries largely did not wane even as the potential for a missed (or, more than likely, delayed) payment rose, and it is apparent that suppression of Treasury yields was in large part thanks to investors’ willingness to pay an insurance premium for a safer asset.

In picking through what happened to markets at the time of the last US debt ceiling impasse, the early headlines about a potential downgrade and then indications of little progress as the deadline approached seemed to have kept Treasury yields elevated, failing to rally on days when Italian spreads moved sharply. However, as the deadline approached and fears about a possible missed payment came to a head, Treasuries rallied substantially, with yields pushing to new lows as a risk-off tone dominated. But it is hard to say with any confidence how much of the rally, if any, was debt ceiling related. Equities certainly declined in part due to debt ceiling fears, but the declines were almost certainly compounded by the European situation and it’s worth noting that the Fed introduced date-dependent rate guidance on August 9th, and this looks to have been their most powerful tool in suppressing long-term yields.

This time the overall position of economies and markets as backcloth to the deficit and debt negotiations is substantially different, and in particular gauging what the broader market will do without Euroland problems to the fore is a challenge. For now, and from first principles, it would seem likely that investors may elect to buy longer dated debt securities if and when prices fall in the face of US deficit and debt-related angst, given the greater vulnerability of risk assets to any especially ugly negotiations on shifting the debt ceiling.

From a purely technical and operational perspective, the US Treasury can roll over the securities that mature at the end of October even without an increase in the debt ceiling, but it would require that they prioritize payments in order to avoid delaying any payments on the debt. While this is an operational possibility, it seems that there is limited capacity to fine tune any prioritization of payments. As we understand it, there are three main systems – the Department of Defence Disbursing Offices, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (which deals with Treasury security related payments) and the Financial Management Service (which makes all other payments) and currently the way that they are set up, is that either all payments are made or none at all. There is a clear unwillingness to prioritize payments given that determining what the pecking order might be is politically messy, but if push comes to shove, and Congress cannot strike a deal in time, the ability to pick and choose who gets paid does exist, if only on a broad basis. In 2011, the press reported that there was some contingency planning going on, but the details of those plans were unknown.

To give a sense of what might be at risk, we note that payments from last year on the date corresponding to our projected deadline were $112.6bn, with much of that concentrated in the $99bn in bills (this year, the maturing bills will be $93bn).

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • James Bevan: First thoughts on the Trump Victory 10 Nov, 2016
  • Borrowing and investment data 2011/12 Borrowing and investment data 2011/12 14 Sep, 2012
  • Economy & markets: global roundup 14 Nov, 2011
  • Richard Harbord: Pension board scrutiny can improve governance 11 Jul, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room 151 6 hours ago

    Council files £130m claim against PFI contractor for post-Grenfell estate costs: London Borough of Camden is suing a former PFI partner and its main subcontractors for £130m for costs relating to the evacuation of one of its housing estates the week[...] dlvr.it/RKkR8C pic.twitter.com/zIfQcikMjq

    Room 151 12 hours ago

    Review highlights ongoing financial management issues at Northamptonshire: Northamptonshire County Council’s new section 151 officer should draw up plans to repatriate powers from government commissioners amid ongoing problems with financial management,… dlvr.it/RKjLkN pic.twitter.com/tQIxMDawQV

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Doug McMurdo: LGPS, the Stewardship Code, good governance and protecting capital: I have spent the last decade leading Bedfordshire Pension Fund (BPF) as chairman of the pensions committee. We are facing many challenges, not least the reforms that the… dlvr.it/RKfJrD

    Room 151 1 day ago

    Active managers still in the game: Under performance and high costs have given active management a bad press, some of it well deserved. But it appears to be on the brink of a renaissance with some[...] dlvr.it/RKfJjR pic.twitter.com/yyAcm1wSMy

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Court ruling leaves councils facing compensation bills for water overcharging: Councils could face compensation costs running into the millions after the High Court ruled that a council unlawfully overcharged its tenants for supplying water from 2002,… dlvr.it/RKZnQK pic.twitter.com/tawdmA9wlE

    Room 151 2 days ago

    Election 2019: “Stark” differences in parties’ proposals for council funding: Conservative Party manifesto proposals would not meet rising costs faced by councils, while Labour Party policies would meet demand even with a council tax freeze, according to… dlvr.it/RKZnNT pic.twitter.com/F16kSfQrXI

    Room 151 3 days ago

    LGPS women discuss: climate & pension fund investing: Climate change has become one of the biggest issues for asset owners and managers as they move to tackle global warming. Room151 convened a roundtable of LGPS practitioners and advisers[...] dlvr.it/RKXsWW pic.twitter.com/3rtUTapwkF

    Room 151 4 days ago

    Interview: Doug Heron, CEO, Lothian Pension Fund: Doug Heron is heading towards marking one year at Lothian after making the switch from the world of fintech platforms to local government pensions. He talks to Room151 about core[...] dlvr.it/RKSQPK pic.twitter.com/ltHR6AS5gD

    Room 151 1 week ago

    LGPS and the climate change revolution: The pressure to integrate climate change thinking into LGPS asset management is growing. At the Room 151 LGPS Asset Allocation Forum, experts insisted climate be seen as a strategic issue[...] dlvr.it/RKK1cY pic.twitter.com/G87J33R4yS

    Room 151 1 week ago

    Conference chairs, ‘tree-hugging’ and overcharging pension investors: I have a story about two LGPS conferences, two conference chairs and an industry that appears to be changing for the better. I know, sounds like a real doozy, but[...] dlvr.it/RKK1Xy pic.twitter.com/6zYQFuuwAr

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Overhaul in health funding requires stakeholder solidarity
  • Next story How far can the commissioning council go?

© Copyright 2019 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK