• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

US debt ceiling and the markets

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan
  • — 1 Oct, 2013

jb-banner-grey
The political headlines over the coming days will likely be all about the potential government shutdown as Washington deliberates on a short-term continuing resolution. While a shutdown seems to be a distinct possibility and might cause some volatility in markets, it should not in and of itself materially affect markets too much, and any effects should dissipate upon an agreement. That said, the inability to reach agreement on a short-term continuing resolution sends a worrying message, particularly with the far more dangerous spectre of the debt ceiling ahead. Without a debt ceiling agreement, it looks likely that the US government will run out of cash around October 24th.

With the market beginning to price yet another contentious US political battle, it’s interesting to focus on what happened to rates in the 2011 debt ceiling showdown, and we can reasonably expect that a protracted stand-off would result in similar moves in the front end, with cheapening of “at risk” Treasuries. The market seems to be starting early this time, as we have already seen a mid- to late-October bills sell-off and moderate inversion of the bill curve. Apart from that it’s very challenging to determine what the 2011 debt ceiling lessons might be for markets given that as political brinkmanship took Washington to the edge, Euroland break-up fears escalated, with Spanish and Italian borrowing costs rising substantially and there was also the looming threat of a ratings downgrade.

Arguably it was the threat that the peripheral sovereign debt crisis represented to Euroland stability that meant that investors’ appetite for Treasuries largely did not wane even as the potential for a missed (or, more than likely, delayed) payment rose, and it is apparent that suppression of Treasury yields was in large part thanks to investors’ willingness to pay an insurance premium for a safer asset.

In picking through what happened to markets at the time of the last US debt ceiling impasse, the early headlines about a potential downgrade and then indications of little progress as the deadline approached seemed to have kept Treasury yields elevated, failing to rally on days when Italian spreads moved sharply. However, as the deadline approached and fears about a possible missed payment came to a head, Treasuries rallied substantially, with yields pushing to new lows as a risk-off tone dominated. But it is hard to say with any confidence how much of the rally, if any, was debt ceiling related. Equities certainly declined in part due to debt ceiling fears, but the declines were almost certainly compounded by the European situation and it’s worth noting that the Fed introduced date-dependent rate guidance on August 9th, and this looks to have been their most powerful tool in suppressing long-term yields.

This time the overall position of economies and markets as backcloth to the deficit and debt negotiations is substantially different, and in particular gauging what the broader market will do without Euroland problems to the fore is a challenge. For now, and from first principles, it would seem likely that investors may elect to buy longer dated debt securities if and when prices fall in the face of US deficit and debt-related angst, given the greater vulnerability of risk assets to any especially ugly negotiations on shifting the debt ceiling.

From a purely technical and operational perspective, the US Treasury can roll over the securities that mature at the end of October even without an increase in the debt ceiling, but it would require that they prioritize payments in order to avoid delaying any payments on the debt. While this is an operational possibility, it seems that there is limited capacity to fine tune any prioritization of payments. As we understand it, there are three main systems – the Department of Defence Disbursing Offices, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (which deals with Treasury security related payments) and the Financial Management Service (which makes all other payments) and currently the way that they are set up, is that either all payments are made or none at all. There is a clear unwillingness to prioritize payments given that determining what the pecking order might be is politically messy, but if push comes to shove, and Congress cannot strike a deal in time, the ability to pick and choose who gets paid does exist, if only on a broad basis. In 2011, the press reported that there was some contingency planning going on, but the details of those plans were unknown.

To give a sense of what might be at risk, we note that payments from last year on the date corresponding to our projected deadline were $112.6bn, with much of that concentrated in the $99bn in bills (this year, the maturing bills will be $93bn).

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • Global macro outlook: Virus versus vaccine 22nd Jan, 2021
  • The risks of de-risking LGPS 12th Jul, 2021
  • Cash flow forecasting key to treasurers 25th May, 2021
  • Making a clean, green future a reality 15th Dec, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 7 hours ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 10 hours ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 1 day ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 1 day ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 1 day ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 2 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 2 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 2 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 2 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 3 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Overhaul in health funding requires stakeholder solidarity
  • Next story How far can the commissioning council go?

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares