• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

The US presidential election: immediate reflections on Mr Obama’s victory

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan
  • — 7 Nov, 2012

Going into the election, there were comments that equities could suffer if Mr Obama were to be re-elected given Mr Obama’s proposal to raise the top rate of tax from 15% to 39.6% on dividends (for those earning more than $200,000 a year) and from 15% to 20% on capital gains, with both raised by a further 3.8% surcharge on investment income under Obamacare. If implemented in full, given that a third of the US equity market is owned by individual investors who earn more than $200,000 a year, these measures in principle take c5% off ‘fair value’ of the S&P 500, although much of this would in the price given that the election result was not a complete surprise. In addition, what happens in practice may be less extreme than the pre-election rhetoric, with scope for compromise. There is also a less well formed concern that Democrats are somehow less business friendly, but an Obama victory may make solving the fiscal cliff easier than a narrow Republican victory, and Mr Bernanke remains in favour at the Fed, which has been hugely supportive of the economy and markets.

In the near term, the policy focus will be on the fiscal cliff – addressing the significant spending cuts and revenue increases set to kick in at the beginning of next year, and extension of the debt ceiling will be required by early March. The key challenge is appropriation or assignment of resources for the different fiscal projects, as opposed to the authorisation of these projects. There are currently 13 individual appropriation bills that have been rolled up into a ‘Continuing Resolution’, which maintain the current level of Federal spending until the end of March 2013. Without the renewal of the appropriation bill, the Federal government would shut down.

There are then planned tightening measures: expiry of the Bush tax cuts (worth $294bn in calendar year 2013, or 1.9% of GDP) at year-end; expiration of employee’s payroll tax reduction ($126bn, 0.8% of GDP) at year-end; other revenue measures (the partial bonus depreciation allowance for capital investment, taxes related to Obamacare and other measures; $111bn, 0.6% of GDP); automatic spending cuts as a consequence of last year’s failed deficit reduction negotiation ($109bn, 0.7% of GDP) starting on January 1st; other spending reductions (unemployment benefits and reduction in Medicare payment rates for physicians; $50bn, 0.3% of GDP); and other tightening measures ($140bn, 0.9% of GDP).

Should the Bush tax cuts and payroll tax cuts expire they would create a combined fiscal drag of 2.7% of GDP or $420bn in the calendar year 2013. The automatic spending cuts that result from last year’s failed negotiations of Committee of Deficit Reduction, due to start on January 1st, would add an additional $109bn, or 0.7% of GDP. The entire fiscal cliff amounts to around $807bn or 5.1% of GDP of tightening, which would clearly push the US economy into recession.  However, such an outcome is seen by market commentators as unlikely and with the incremental tightening manageable, particularly given that the US private sector looks increasingly strong. Interestingly some analysts note that Mr Obama’s victory limits the influence of the Tea party and may make a deal on fiscal policy easier than it would otherwise have been and the context for all of this is that there is wide recognition that there must be a medium-term plan to reduce the deficit. Importantly, the US is effectively on a two-year political cycle, with a third of the Senate and all of the House of Representatives up for election every two years. This means that there is little incentive to cause a recession that would damage near-term future electoral prospects.  Furthermore, with yields so low, there is in effect no bond market pressure to tighten policy significantly. There is of course the precedent of President Clinton’s deal with the Republicans in his second term (with a Republican House and Senate) after lack of compromise in his first term had led to a government shut-down. There was also reasonable co-operation between the outgoing Bush administration and Obama in the 2008 lame-duck session.

Mr Obama’s victory can also be seen heading off risks that Mr Romney would have represented for markets. In particular, Mr Romney had indicated policies on China (with the threat to name it as a “currency manipulator” on the first day of his presidency), the Fed (opposition to Mr Bernanke and QE), spending on infrastructure and education, two areas crucial to the long-run growth rate of an economy, and R&D (Mr Obama’s said he would seek to expand and make permanent the R&D tax credit) that could have upset markets.

Looking forward, if there is a deal on the fiscal cliff, US corporate spending may be the main beneficiary, given that corporate confidence and investment already strongly reflect worries about the fiscal cliff, while consumer confidence has risen to the highest since February 2008. The US corporate sector is in excellent shape with record free cash-flow, low leverage, and any sign of a deal (or even just a six- to twelve-month extension) could lead to a bounce-back in productivity-enhancing US corporate spending.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • Rate rise represents ‘fastest increase in borrowing costs in 25 years’ 9th May, 2022
  • Impact Awards: Case studies reveal ‘vital contribution’ of finance 25th Mar, 2021
  • Q&A: Bond agency responds to ‘ill-informed speculation’ 4th Jul, 2021
  • Room151’s 10th Anniversary: A treasury decade that saw borrowing double and investments transformed 25th Nov, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Fund management costs – what lies beneath?
  • Next story S&P affirms BCC rating at AA+

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares