• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Treasurers need elected members to focus on risk

0
  • by Editor
  • in Blogs
  • — 25 Apr, 2013

A small group of local authority finance officers gathered yesterday with Room151 and our London & South-East Think Tank host, J.P. Morgan Asset Management, to explore current challenges in the treasury office.

Observing the Chatham House Rule, we thrashed out themes from alternative investments for core cash to the biggest perceived risks facing local authority capital today. A recurring theme, worthy of some reflection, was the crucial role members can play in supporting (or not) their officers in developing and implementing a strategy for a secure treasury portfolio with a meaningful yield.

One thing was clear: we were not discussing a level playing field. There are councils with members from finance backgrounds for whom investment risk is meat and drink and there are those whose politicians need guidance every step of the way. Guidance though, is only part of it. Arguably there are members who hold deeply entrenched biases, both negative and positive, towards different types of investment and/or counterparties and it falls to officers to find ways to challenge those prejudices.

It’s often personal experience, quite naturally, that informs elected members and shapes the ideas they bring to the table. Yesterday we heard from an officer who couldn’t get sign off on building societies because of a negative experience a member had had with a single counterparty, as a retail customer. We heard from others who wanted to invest in money market funds and couldn’t because they hadn’t been able to overcome member reluctance to them.

Whatever the type of investment though, it was interesting to see that to a greater or lesser extent, treasury officers felt they could make their cash work harder if they could just bring their politicians round to looking at risk in a more structured way.

Two truisms, for me, emerged from the discussion: there is no point taking greater risk if you don’t get rewarded for it and there is not point yielding little when you could get more for the same level of risk. That’s all very well, but if you don’t have simple ways of demonstrating to members how much risk each type of investment carries, then those basic messages get lost amidst the bias and conjecture.

An interesting and, dare I say it, fun exercise is to get members to play devil’s advocate by drawing different asset classes from a hat and asking them to make the case for, or argue against, a given investment. A short explanation starting, for example, “We should/shouldn’t be investing in corporate bonds because…” will show you, and more importantly the members themselves, whether or not they have understood the associated risks, regardless of their personal views. If they can’t make the cases both for and against an investment then perhaps there’s room for some further training.

If you have any useful exercises or training tips for getting members to challenge their own preconceptions or for exploring investment risk, send them in or post them here.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————–

EVENTS The 5th Local Authority Treasurers’ Investment Forum
September 19th, 2013
Local authority finance officers REGISTER free, subject to availability.

Share

You may also like...

  • Progress and the outlook for investors Progress and the outlook for investors 2 Feb, 2012
  • China: caution looks prudent but there are presently no grounds for panic China: caution looks prudent but there are presently no grounds for panic 25 May, 2012
  • Graham Liddell: Living happily ever after (with a shared service) Graham Liddell: Living happily ever after (with a shared service) 7 Jun, 2016
  • It’s good to talk: engagement with Tier 3 employers in the LGPS It’s good to talk: engagement with Tier 3 employers in the LGPS 28 Oct, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 15 hours ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 1 day ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 1 day ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    GameStop: A lesson for LGPS in the risks of short selling: Day traders coordinating their efforts through the social media platform Reddit have not only boosted the stock of US GameStop, but also badly hurt hedge funds engaged in huge bets[...] dlvr.it/RsGdVV pic.twitter.com/NTMC3j6J2u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Room151 panel backs unitary councils and devolution: Bigger isn’t always better when it comes to local government, according to Sir Bob Kerslake, chair of the Peabody Trust, but “ …we need to move to unitary government and[...] dlvr.it/RsFPNv pic.twitter.com/lT4eCi0TmV

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story What will UK GDP numbers tell us?
  • Next story Vic Allison on investing in the community

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.