• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

US fund flow and US profitability

0
  • by James Bevan
  • in Blogs · James Bevan
  • — 12 Mar, 2012

According to last Thursday’s flow of funds data, US corporate profits before tax and dividends rose to $1860bn at an annual rate during Q4 2011, up from $1050bn in Q4 2008. In the domestic non-financial sector, corporate profits have risen by around 20% from their lows and after tax and dividends, profits in this sector now amount to $466bn, up from a low of just over $300bn in the crisis. As a percentage of GDP, total corporate profits are now around 14%: one of the highest levels ever recorded. This, some have suggested is a reason to expect a CAPEX led boom in the USA in 2012. However, we must also note that although profit ratios are remarkably high, US profits in aggregate fell 1.5% over Q4 and are basically unchanged from early 2011. On a GDP basis, profits after tax and dividends in the domestic non-financial sector were down fully 10% over Q4 and back to mid 2010’s levels. These figures would not seem worthy of a new CAPEX boom.

More fundamentally, even these profits, and particularly the rate of profit in the economy, have been heavily reliant on support from the government, and this support may or may not be continued after the elections.

From first principles, the profit rate is inversely related to the economy’s savings rate, and in the 1990s and particularly the mid 2000s, US household savings rates collapsed as people spent on average $106 of every $100 they earned. The profit share of GDP naturally increased (particularly since the government budget balance stayed roughly constant at that time). However, when the global financial crisis forced households to start saving, the profit rate collapsed.

Since 2008, US households have generally held their savings rate in a range of 4-5% and their financial surplus has generally been around $500bn per quarter at an annual rate (and Q4 2011 was roughly right in line with this ‘average’ performance, although some households did incur some more consumer credit while others apparently hoarded deposits). This suggests that they are spending around $96 of every $100 that they earn, which is clearly not overly helpful for corporate profits. However, the US government is spending around $140 of every $100 it takes in taxes and this level of dis-saving is obviously hugely supportive of profits. The government is spending money on goods and services made by companies that it has not had to raise in taxes on companies and at the same time it is giving households money to spend that companies have not had to give them. Hence, the budget deficit has been the main driver of the US profit renaissance, not cost cutting, retrenchment and similar.

It is interesting to note that the expansion in the ongoing budget deficit from $400bn per quarter in 2007 to $1.3tn today has resulted in a $400bn increase in corporate profits and a $600bn increase in wage incomes. In short, it can be argued that virtually all the US’s relatively modest income growth since 2007 can be attributed to the wider budget deficit. Given that most people must eventually expect the budget deficit to close, this would not seem to offer a good reason to expect an investment boom.

That said, there are specific micro-led investment booms occurring in the US at present. The US manufacturing sector is competitive and doing well, but it is only 10% of the economy and entrepreneurs and ultra small cap companies are also doing well. Even the property market is stirring. These developments will contribute to some growth in CAPEX this year (although they may be offset by other weaker factors elsewhere in the aggregate data. But they do not imply that an economy-wide investment led boom is forming that will lift total GDP substantially.

James Bevan is chief investment officer of CCLA, specialist fund manager for charities and the public sector. CCLA launched The Public Sector Deposit Fund in 2011 to meet the needs of local authorities and other public sector organisations. You can follow James on twitter @jamesbevan_ccla

Share

You may also like...

  • Could 2021 be less eventful for LGPS, please? 3rd Mar, 2021
  • Making a clean, green future a reality 15th Dec, 2021
  • Clampdown on commercialism ‘could push some councils to the cliff edge’ 4th Feb, 2022
  • Local authority accounts: embrace the complexity 28th Mar, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 4 hours ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 5 hours ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 5 hours ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 10 hours ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 1 day ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 1 week ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 1 week ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Diversity: building societies, corporate bonds and money market funds
  • Next story The week in prospect: China, US, Europe, Japan

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares