• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

2015 Review: Finance goes strategic and the significance of flood defences

0
  • by Guest
  • in Funding · Resources
  • — 15 Dec, 2015
Photo (cropped): Defence Images

Photo (cropped): Defence Images

Stephen Fitzgerald looks back at the year and finds that heading finance is becoming strategic while the headlines made by flooding and child protection reveal the diversity and challenges of running local government.

Another year draws to a close and it’s time for some personal reflections. The first thing that strikes me is that those in local government have continued to deliver a professional job.

The advice that finance professionals have provided their organisations helped to ensure that the books continued to be balanced and financial sustainability maintained.  This is in marked contrast to the wide-scale deficit budgeting in the health service and some persistent governance issues within the private sector.

Against this attacks on the levels of professional remuneration have continued on the basis that if only public sector executives were payed less the world would be a better place.  In fact, what needs to be done is a development of attractive futures for public sector managers to ensure strong leadership of large public organisations. But more of this later.

Microcosm

At the start of the year I was working in support of a finance team in a unitary authority. Inevitably, activity focused on the annual budget and the setting of council tax.  As a side show I watched with interest while the police authority tried to convince their local taxpayers that a precept which proposed crashing through the government’s 2% council tax ceiling was a desirable thing. It failed.

This relatively minor, but symbolically important, piece of public sector history demonstrated in a microcosm how the public views deficit reduction; largely as a necessary evil.

Additionally, it demonstrated the lack of enthusiasm for large council tax increases.  We have to remember that council tax is essentially regressive imposing the greatest burden on low income households. Any council tax increase, therefore, must be considered carefully.

This is why, it is important that those whose professional role is to advise council’s on financial policy should offer a range of options for the setting of the council tax rather than present one position for council members to accept or reject.

Election battle

So, if this minor skirmish demonstrated that there was passive support for the government’s deficit reduction, and a lack of enthusiasm for an increase in taxation, this was widely reaffirmed by the results of the greater battle that was the general election.

It is hard to believe now that it was considered a possibility that Ed Miliband would remove David Cameron from Number 10.  Indeed the Liberal Democrat claim that they had mitigated the worse effects of the Conservative right, while in coalition, was rewarded by the party being swallowed up by the Cameron juggernaut.

The argument has been made that Conservative policies towards the public sector have been unpopular but if so, it has clearly not had a significant impact in terms of the electoral outcome.  From where Cameron sits now the only thing he may be regretting is the statement that he would only stand for two terms.

However, in the fall out from the election there have been some changes in the public sector approach which can be seen as a demonstration of a new less defensive, confident approach in Conservative policy.

On a personal level the grizzled local government warriors Eric Pickles and Bob Kerslake were replaced by the fresh faced Greg Clark MP and Melanie Dawes (as secretary of state and permanent secretary) at the Department for Communities and Local Government.  Clark, who is generally considered to have scored some significant successes as minister for cities, presents a rather more measured approach to local government to that of the determined Pickles.  This can only be welcomed.

Careful what you wish for

In policy terms there have already been some important developments.  The full localisation of business rates gives the local authority lobby something that it has been asking for. However, as I stated in some previous comments in Room 151, you have to be careful for what you wish for.

This policy will have the advantage for government of removing the need to fund local authorities through block grant and will potentially give them more ability to influence their financial futures.

But I struggle to see how it will represent a good settlement for those authorities that have a low local tax base built from business and domestic taxation.

The government will be announcing transitional arrangements, but the days of attempting equalisation at the national level are over, which is also potentially bad news for local authorities.

Soundings suggest that some councils will be awash with cash where they have a buoyant business rate base. Others will be left behind if they are unable to improve their local economic circumstances.

Applause and a soft approach

Following this was a change in approach on council tax.  In the spending review the government enabled local authorities to increase tax by 2% to assist with meeting the increasing costs to adult social care.

The interpretation of this policy is that it is in addition to the 2% allowed for the general council tax increase before the referendum requirements are enabled.  That said, we do not yet know the future of the council tax freeze grant for next year, though there does appear to be a change in mood which suggests that some discretion on council tax increase is seen as desirable – the new softer approach from central government.

The creation of super councils pioneered by the initiative in the Manchester was a further positive development that can be applauded.

Finally, in this section the government has rattled its sabre over the holding of local authority revenue reserves, though ultimately taken no action.

My personal view is that, as the legislation stands at present, government could not remove money held by local authorities unless there is a new act of parliament.  Alternatively, stepping back from the raid on reserves, may be a sign of the more enabling partnership approach that central government appears to be adopting.

Managerially, a moment that struck a chord with me was a session given at ACCA’s Local Government Summit in the autumn.  John Dennis of Insight Management Solutions gave a thought provoking session about the strategic role of the finance manager.

As finance professionals it is important that we are on top of the detail and provide processes that support the organisations that we work in.  However, if finance professionals wish to contribute at the strategic level they need to  to develop an overview and step out of the detail to contribute to corporate strategic vision.

This means that in finance teams, managers must empower their staff to take on more operational responsibility to enable those in leadership roles to operate in a strategic fashion.

The theory of this is straight forward but the implementation is not as easy as the management text books suggest.  Particularly for finance leaders, this is about delegating responsibility for process work and thinking more creatively about how they can help steer organisations.

Limelight

As we come to the end of the year, two particular services that local government provide are being thrust into the limelight of publicity.  Few would have identified flood defence as one of the most high profile local services.  But with the impact of global warming and recent localised freak weather events, flood defence and its management has become one of the most critical public services.

Secondly, child protection is once more in the forefront of the news with the Prime Minster threatening intervention where the service is perceived as underperforming.

For me the focus on these two service areas sums up the spread and importance of local services.  One is a universal service that protects the health, safety and livelihoods of all in a local community while the other is a service that most of us will, thankfully, have no contact with but provides for the safety and very existence of some of the most vulnerable members of our local communities.

Does this not sum up the huge diversity of local services and why local government is one of the most rewarding but challenging parts of the public sector?

So, as the year draws to a close those working in local government can look with some satisfaction on a year that has been successful for the sector despite the financial challenges.  The future can still be positive and decline is not inevitable.

In the New Year it is important that all of us focus on the positives and put the case for the development of the local government service and its staff for the long term benefit of the country as a whole.  Happy Christmas to you all.

stephfitzStephen Fitzgerald is a management and financial consultant in local government.

@SHJFitzgerald

Flooding photo (cropped): Defence Images, Flickr.

Share

You may also like...

  • Guy Ware: Ten years on — a journey from crash to local government finance Guy Ware: Ten years on — a journey from crash to local government finance 11 Jun, 2018
  • Borrowed time: will revising guidance dampen the commercial property craze? Borrowed time: will revising guidance dampen the commercial property craze? 28 Nov, 2018
  • NAO calls on Whitehall to confront long-term funding of local government NAO calls on Whitehall to confront long-term funding of local government 8 Mar, 2018
  • Call for needs-based solution as districts ‘punished’ by negative RSG proposals Call for needs-based solution as districts ‘punished’ by negative RSG proposals 25 Jul, 2018

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 12 hours ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 16 hours ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 16 hours ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 2 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 2 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 2 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 3 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 1 week ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Is local government funding “broken”?: Andrew Hardingham looks at the underlying issues that caused more than a third of respondents in the Room151/CCLA treasury survey to say that the funding system for local govenrment is[...] dlvr.it/RsYhsg pic.twitter.com/plNp7Ayys6

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story 2015 Review: Election year marked by a deluge of business rates appeals
  • Next story 2015 Review: Goodbye Mr Pickles

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.