• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

A local income tax could empower councils – but there’s no free lunch

0
  • by Editor
  • in Blogs · Funding
  • — 28 Mar, 2019

Tom Harris, UK local government research officer at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, makes the case for income tax devolution.

With Westminster in turmoil over how (and whether) to ‘take back control’ from Brussels, calls for the government to devolve more control over tax and public services to county and city halls have been struggling to gain traction.

Just three years ago things seemed different. George Osborne had pledged a “devolution revolution” with financially self-sufficient local government. Of course, the centrepiece of these plans – 100% business rates retention – didn’t survive the post-Brexit political fallout. And there is growing talk that the watered down plans (75% retention and the ‘Fair Funding Review’) may themselves be fudged.

In this context, the conclusion from our latest report on local government finance – that a local income tax would be the best option if we wanted to resurrect plans to devolve significant additional revenues to councils – may seem bold to say the least.

But hear us out.

Would a local income tax be an answer to the demands for local control and local incentives?

Given the scale of income tax revenues relative to councils’ existing spending needs, it would be unreasonable to consider full devolution. Instead, the most logical option would be to allow councils to control only a portion of the income tax schedule.

Even such partial devolution could bring in a lot of money. Our estimates suggest that each 1% of a local income tax on all tax bands would raise about £6 billion across England. In comparison, other ideas being discussed, like a tourist tax, would raise only a fraction of this. It’s also a buoyant tax: revenues would grow with inflation and incomes over time, without the need for manual increases like council tax.

In addition, allowing councils to keep a portion of income tax would provide them with a clear financial incentive to boost the incomes of local residents. That could mean increasing the number and quality of jobs in local areas – but also investing in skills and transport links to access opportunities in neighbouring areas. And unlike business rates, all local income taxpayers would have the right to vote in local elections, allowing them to hold councils to account for the tax rates set.

This would allow for more variation across councils according to local preferences. For example, Surrey might choose to set higher tax rates to fund higher quality services. Slough, on the other hand, might choose to set lower tax rates to attract new taxpayers, boost consumer spending and support local economic development. This kind of local flexibility might be exactly what councils are after.

But, would there be any difficulties?

While it would be much easier to localise than VAT or corporation tax, administering a local income tax would also bring challenges.

In particular, HMRC doesn’t currently know where all taxpayers live, as there is no statutory duty to provide this information. That would have to change. In addition, while being less mobile than sales and profits, people can move between areas, and tax rates could be a factor in their location choices. Yet, restricting councils’ powers to levy a flat-rate income tax, as discussed above, would limit the distortions associated with this. Ultimately, this would mean that councils couldn’t jack up or cut taxes on their highest income residents, for instance, without changing them for everyone else.

However, even if councils were only allowed to levy a flat-rate tax, there would still be substantial inequalities in revenue across areas – as shown in the map below. For example, many richer parts of west London would raise more than six times the amount that could be raised in councils like Hull and Leicester.

Left unchecked, this could result in large disparities in service provision between areas. This means there would likely need to be a system to redistribute these revenues between councils. But as we’ve seen with the existing grant allocation process, determining such redistribution is itself a tricky task.

More local control, but what about councils’ funding woes?

In the end, a local income tax would involve a trade-off between more local control and stronger incentives on the one hand; and the risk of the funding divergences these might entail on the other.

But if tax devolution is seen by councils as a way to increase their funding, they may be disappointed. A local income tax would not be a free lunch. Either national rates would need to be cut to make ‘room’ for the local rate, potentially meaning there would be less to spend on nationally-funded services like the NHS, or a local surtax would have to be charged on top of existing rates – meaning a tax rise.

So, if we are truly to address councils’ funding woes, we need a debate about tax levels as much as about tax devolution.

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Room151 Conferences & Events

Share

You may also like...

  • Borrowed time: will revising guidance dampen the commercial property craze? Borrowed time: will revising guidance dampen the commercial property craze? 28 Nov, 2018
  • Councils divided on arts cuts Councils divided on arts cuts 8 May, 2013
  • Aileen Murphie: The state of local government funding pressures Aileen Murphie: The state of local government funding pressures 18 Jun, 2018
  • Fiscal union, European banks and sovereign indebtedness Fiscal union, European banks and sovereign indebtedness 13 Dec, 2011

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 21 hours ago

    Going beyond the standard metrics for climate change: Sponsored article: With climate change an investment imperative and an imminent reporting requirement, Ritesh Bamania argues UK pension schemes should look beyond today’s standard metrics. With… dlvr.it/RtnpLS pic.twitter.com/6ABaFHyS9I

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS webinar: Governance the key to TCFD implementation: LGPS funds have been warned that governance is it at the here of Whitehall plans to impose a new climate reporting regime on pension funds. In January the Department for[...] dlvr.it/RtjwNq pic.twitter.com/YMiMdmRyzU

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS webinar: Central bank management of bond purchasing could affect all asset classes: When the government debt caused by the pandemic is eventually tackled there may be a huge impact on assets of all classes, according to a leading investment expert… dlvr.it/RtjwJx pic.twitter.com/7v8K5vMYHo

    Room151 2 days ago

    #LGPS readers...what to do about #bonds? room151.co.uk/blogs/lgps-web… @BrunelPP 's new CIO, David Vickers tackles a problematic area #centralbanks #assetallocation #fixedincome pic.twitter.com/yUJr0azbKv

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS Challenges: Balancing Realpolitik and responsible investment: Elizabeth M. Carey warns of the perils of an ESG echo chamber as countries outside the West continue to invest in fossil fuels. Anyone working with the LGPS probably feels[...] dlvr.it/RtjMpq pic.twitter.com/MykIYxuYri

    Room151 6 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 6 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 6 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 7 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 1 week ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Contemplating commercialism: ask the right questions before you invest
  • Next story SURVEY RESULTS: Officers expect no extra cash from Fair Funding Review

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.