• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

A local income tax could empower councils – but there’s no free lunch

0
  • by Editor
  • in Blogs · Funding
  • — 28 Mar, 2019

Tom Harris, UK local government research officer at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, makes the case for income tax devolution.

With Westminster in turmoil over how (and whether) to ‘take back control’ from Brussels, calls for the government to devolve more control over tax and public services to county and city halls have been struggling to gain traction.

Just three years ago things seemed different. George Osborne had pledged a “devolution revolution” with financially self-sufficient local government. Of course, the centrepiece of these plans – 100% business rates retention – didn’t survive the post-Brexit political fallout. And there is growing talk that the watered down plans (75% retention and the ‘Fair Funding Review’) may themselves be fudged.

In this context, the conclusion from our latest report on local government finance – that a local income tax would be the best option if we wanted to resurrect plans to devolve significant additional revenues to councils – may seem bold to say the least.

But hear us out.

Would a local income tax be an answer to the demands for local control and local incentives?

Given the scale of income tax revenues relative to councils’ existing spending needs, it would be unreasonable to consider full devolution. Instead, the most logical option would be to allow councils to control only a portion of the income tax schedule.

Even such partial devolution could bring in a lot of money. Our estimates suggest that each 1% of a local income tax on all tax bands would raise about £6 billion across England. In comparison, other ideas being discussed, like a tourist tax, would raise only a fraction of this. It’s also a buoyant tax: revenues would grow with inflation and incomes over time, without the need for manual increases like council tax.

In addition, allowing councils to keep a portion of income tax would provide them with a clear financial incentive to boost the incomes of local residents. That could mean increasing the number and quality of jobs in local areas – but also investing in skills and transport links to access opportunities in neighbouring areas. And unlike business rates, all local income taxpayers would have the right to vote in local elections, allowing them to hold councils to account for the tax rates set.

This would allow for more variation across councils according to local preferences. For example, Surrey might choose to set higher tax rates to fund higher quality services. Slough, on the other hand, might choose to set lower tax rates to attract new taxpayers, boost consumer spending and support local economic development. This kind of local flexibility might be exactly what councils are after.

But, would there be any difficulties?

While it would be much easier to localise than VAT or corporation tax, administering a local income tax would also bring challenges.

In particular, HMRC doesn’t currently know where all taxpayers live, as there is no statutory duty to provide this information. That would have to change. In addition, while being less mobile than sales and profits, people can move between areas, and tax rates could be a factor in their location choices. Yet, restricting councils’ powers to levy a flat-rate income tax, as discussed above, would limit the distortions associated with this. Ultimately, this would mean that councils couldn’t jack up or cut taxes on their highest income residents, for instance, without changing them for everyone else.

However, even if councils were only allowed to levy a flat-rate tax, there would still be substantial inequalities in revenue across areas – as shown in the map below. For example, many richer parts of west London would raise more than six times the amount that could be raised in councils like Hull and Leicester.

Left unchecked, this could result in large disparities in service provision between areas. This means there would likely need to be a system to redistribute these revenues between councils. But as we’ve seen with the existing grant allocation process, determining such redistribution is itself a tricky task.

More local control, but what about councils’ funding woes?

In the end, a local income tax would involve a trade-off between more local control and stronger incentives on the one hand; and the risk of the funding divergences these might entail on the other.

But if tax devolution is seen by councils as a way to increase their funding, they may be disappointed. A local income tax would not be a free lunch. Either national rates would need to be cut to make ‘room’ for the local rate, potentially meaning there would be less to spend on nationally-funded services like the NHS, or a local surtax would have to be charged on top of existing rates – meaning a tax rise.

So, if we are truly to address councils’ funding woes, we need a debate about tax levels as much as about tax devolution.

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Room151 Conferences & Events

Share

You may also like...

  • Settlement 2022-2023: £53.9bn in ‘one-year’ deal aimed at ‘stability’ 17th Dec, 2021
  • The vaccine may help settle cash flows but inflation remains a risk 13th Jan, 2021
  • Room151 launches Audit Committee Masterclass 28th Oct, 2021
  • Controlling inflation: the conundrum for central banks 23rd Feb, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 8 hours ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 11 hours ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 1 day ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 1 day ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 1 day ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 2 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 2 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 2 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 2 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 2 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 4 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Contemplating commercialism: ask the right questions before you invest
  • Next story SURVEY RESULTS: Officers expect no extra cash from Fair Funding Review

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares