• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Agent151: The ‘cathedral of complexity’ at the heart of devolution

0
  • by Agent 151
  • in Agent 151 · Blogs · Funding
  • — 26 Oct, 2016

agent 151 520The best systems impress with their simplicity. I am sorry to say that there is no likelihood that this will be the case with devolved business rates.

The opportunity has already been irrevocably complicated by short-sighted policymaking on the part of the government and is being convoluted further by the conflicting demands of the local government community. These factors together have created the perfect environment in which the civil service’s predilection for the byzantine can be indulged to the full.  We can expect a veritable cathedral of complexity.

The consultation process has already elicited cries of annoyance and frustration from local authority treasurers in all parts of the country.  The list that follows is by no means a complete summation of the things that have set the veins ticking in our colleagues’ temples, but it should give you the general idea.

The existing devolution deals, announced with much trumpeting as the ground-breaking empowerment of disenfranchised and flagging corners of the country, are now being seen in their true colours: they are anomalous and hurried compromises. Quite how these can be brought in line with a new system in a way that is perceived as fair, without unpicking the substance of the local devolution agreement, is anyone’s guess.

There is very little in the way of information from the government, and the consequence of this is that everyone is making it up as they go along. Some meaningful modelling of the numbers, taking into consideration the existing devolution deals, would have focussed the conversation in a very helpful way. The pilots planned for London, Merseyside, Greater Manchester, West Midlands, and the Sheffield city region would be a very useful source of information, but regrettably do not start until April 2017.

No-one in local government has the capacity to devote enough time and expertise to the exercise. The government seems to have overlooked the fact that we are all still busy trying to balance budgets in a world in which resources continue to be cut, social care demand continues to grow, and our greatest hope is that we may get a few scraps from the Health Service fine dining table. There are many important points of business rates devolution detail that no-one has had time to address yet, and the clock is ticking.

There is a conflict of interests, real or imagined, between colleagues in different parts of the country concerning the distribution of resources. The best illustration of this is the controversy concerning the city-state line that London has taken, demanding to keep all of its business rates income and to take the power to control the multiplier, revaluation, and reliefs locally; albeit with additional responsibilities matched to the additional funding. Of course, the question of who should enjoy the benefits of London’s growth is the key point of disagreement

The debate about what new responsibilities local government as a whole should take on with the additional business rates to be devolved has also had its difficulties. Local authorities are working hard not to be cynical about whether new responsibilities will be fully funded, having been bitten so many times in the past that the scars are scars on scars. New responsibilities should offer some opportunity to advance the local authority agenda, which is why DWP’s offering of attendance allowance has been universally rejected. The LGA’s view that existing unfunded pressures, such as adult social care growth, should come first is spot on, but it won’t be well received in Whitehall.

Finally, the thorny question of what the redistribution mechanism should look like lies at the heart of the debate. Should we seize the opportunity to simplify this labyrinthine muddle? If we do, will we be sacrificing fairness, or at least a semblance of fairness?

We are doomed to enjoy the fruits of our collective labours in relation to business rates devolution for many years to come. Getting this right is a prize that is really worth having. If we fail to collaborate effectively, we will live with the consequences. Of course, a very likely consequence of getting it wrong will be ongoing tweaking of the system, creating even more layers of complexity. Which is where we came in. Welcome to the cathedral.

Agent151 is a senior local authority finance director and s151 officer.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Richard Harbord: ‘Effective governance’ the key to commercial activity 17th Aug, 2021
  • Aligning financial and climate obligations within fixed income portfolios 29th Apr, 2021
  • Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions 11th May, 2022
  • Economy: Inflation on the rise while the MPC sticks with ‘patient approach’ 28th Jul, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 23 hours ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 24 hours ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 2 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 6 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 7 days ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

    Room151 1 week ago

    Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash: Dan Bates discusses the latest data on the publication of local authority accounts and examines why so many councils missed the 31 July deadline. Sunday 31 July 2022 was the[...] dlvr.it/SVx2ZT pic.twitter.com/gdELhD3Yis

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story Richard Harbord: Balanced budget reform and a ‘sense of safety’
  • Next story Local authority property deals to hit £1bn in 2016

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website.OK