• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Slough welcomes commitment that Office for Local Government ‘will not be a burden’

    June 30, 2022

  • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities

    June 29, 2022

  • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets

    June 28, 2022

  • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’

    June 27, 2022

  • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’

    June 27, 2022

  • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council

    June 23, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Birmingham cites unequal cuts in response to Kerslake improvement report

1
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Funding
  • — 10 Dec, 2014

Birmingham City Council has hit back after a Whitehall review accused it of having no “Plan B” if assumed central support of £265m is not forthcoming.
Concerns about the council’s long term budgeting were raised in a review of governance and organisational capabilities of the council led by Department for Communities and Local Government permanent secretary Bob Kerslake, published yesterday.

The review said that if the government money – largely for children’s services – is not forthcoming, it will be faced with a combination of low reserves and a “huge financial challenge” in the two subsequent years.
It said: “The existing service review process appears to have been based on the assumption that that the additional funding from central government will be made available in 2016/17 and 2017/18 when that decisions is completely outside the council’s control.
“We have not been presented with evidence that the council yet has a credible plan B if the additional funding does not materialise.”

A statement from the council said that a review undertaken by Lord Warner, commissioner for children’s safeguarding, said that the council’s own money would not be enough to meet its children’s services improvements programme.
It said that it would “continue to ask the Government for financial assistance to deliver this programme”.
“The council’s financial strategy therefore provides for this additional funding in 2015/16 and recognises that it increases the gap to be addressed thereafter,” it added.
Kerslake’s report said that the council needs “as a matter of urgency” to develop a robust plan for how it will manage its finances up to 2018/19 without recourse to further additional funding from central government.
This should propose significant further reductions in costs and measures to tackle levels of demands, it said.

In response, the council said: “We recognise the importance of better tackling demand management in some key services, but the report fails to acknowledge the risks of cost driven demand management in certain areas such as child protection and adult social care with which we, at a local level, are all too familiar.”
Kerslake’s report praised the council for effective decisions in achieving savings so far, along with a “robust” monitoring process to ensure the delivery of efficiencies.
But it added that the reductions have been “too reactive and tactical”.
It said: “This is not sustainable. They need to be more strategic, transformational and underpinned by stronger analysis. A step change is needed.”

The council responded: “We are clear that we need a different medium term financial strategy that more clearly supports our priorities and key outcomes, and underpins the model of the future council.”
It said it was already considering how to implement this ahead of the 2016+ budget cycle.
A statement released by the council also said it was disappointed that the report did not explicitly recognise the “impending financial crisis in local public services across the country”, and said that it faced a reduction in spending power of 5.7% next year, compared to a national average of 2%
In a dig at the department, it added: “The recent report of the National Audit Office echoes these concerns and makes clear that the DCLG has failed to monitor adequately the risks of the present funding policy.”

Following the report, communities secretary Eric Pickles announced that he will appoint an independent improvement panel to provide support to the council to in implementing changes. The panel will report back on progress in December 2015.
Pickles said: “I thank Sir Bob and his team for their work and look forward to seeing how Birmingham, its leaders and the improvement panel I am appointing respond to the challenge he has set them.
“But be in no doubt that if they do not, the next government may decide to take much tougher action.”

Photo (cropped) by Matthew Black

Share

You may also like...

  • Government welcomes devolution bid by four Midlands councils 16th Jun, 2022
  • Mike Thatcher: constructing a new role for local government 27th Jan, 2022
  • Reasons to be cheerful in a time of major change for local government finance 16th Dec, 2021
  • Counting the infrastructure costs for county councils 14th Mar, 2022

1 Comment

  1. pvdw1958 says:
    2014/12/13 at 12:19

    Birmingham have a right to be aggrieved at their treatment by DCLG. Had Sir Bob’s report examined the role of DCLG, it would have found that Birmingham had been given a disproportionate share of grant cuts (9% higher cut in spending power and over twice the England average grant cut per dwelling) and had been failed by DCLGs grant protection arrangements. As one of the top ten deprived councils in the Country and a council heavily dependent on grant to meet its statutory responsibilities, the fact that the councils has not received any damping protection and has instead had to make over £40m of extra cuts to pay for the protection of the least deprived and least grant dependent councils in the country shows just how flawed DCLGs grant system is. NAOs recent reports into the financial sustainability of local authorities have identified some of the failings at DCLG. The evidence that I submitted to PAC warrants a further independent investigation of other failings , particularly their ineffective attempts to provide protection for the most grant depending authorities. Parliament needs to better understand the failings of DCLG to allocate grant cuts fairly around the country; the huge risks that this poses for the financial viability to councils and the sustainability of the local government finance when it considers the 2015/16 grant settlement. The citizens of Birmingham and all those parts of the country suffering from the failings of DCLGs approach need better protection and quickly, from a more proportionate approach to allocating funding cuts and a system that gives effective funding protection, which can be achieved while also incentivising growth. How many councils will need to fail and how many citizens will need to suffer before effective action is taken?

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Homes England agrees strategic partnership with two authorities
    • Soaring inflation and pay pressures to add £3.6bn to council budgets
    • Underfunded social care reforms could ‘exacerbate workforce pressures’
    • Nottingham City Council leader labels proposed intervention as ‘disappointing’
    • Government preparing to intervene in Nottingham City Council
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Hillier confirmed as keynote speaker for LATIF/FDs’ Summit: Dame Meg Hillier, chair of the Public Accounts Committee, has been confirmed as a keynote speaker for Room151’s combined Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs Summit. The… dlvr.it/ST70F7 pic.twitter.com/hxV676Iley

    Room151 6 hours ago

    Councils’ funding at risk due to ‘undercounting’ in census data: Population estimates in London and Manchester may have been significantly underestimated in the 2021 census potentially threatening government funding for frontline services in these… dlvr.it/ST707J pic.twitter.com/VncIyaXa01

    Room151 2 days ago

    Gove at LGA: councils to receive two-year financial settlement: Michael Gove has announced that councils will receive a two-year financial settlement from next year to provide authorities with “financial certainty” and allow them to plan ahead. The… dlvr.it/ST0kSV pic.twitter.com/wxL3UM4sGO

    Room151 2 days ago

    LGPS valuations: the digital journey: Rob Bilton explains how technology is helping to deliver one of the most complex data exercises in the world of public sector pensions. The 2022 valuations for LGPS funds in[...] dlvr.it/ST0kMq pic.twitter.com/VxjSPC2Uvo

    Room151 6 days ago

    Conrad Hall: ‘more sophisticated’ regulation needed for local government: The chair of the CIPFA/LASAAC Code Board has questioned the sophistication of financial regulation in local government and the continuing focus of the Department for Levelling Up,… dlvr.it/SSnPBV pic.twitter.com/G5d7JCWF8c

    Room151 1 week ago

    Slough Council approves plans to restructure finance department: Slough Borough Council has approved plans to restructure its finance department to enhance capacity and capability and to address a “significant weakness” in the function. The local… dlvr.it/SSf8DG pic.twitter.com/l5lmyHmkBg

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story James Bevan: Optimism of the herd may be good news in the short term for investors
  • Next story Audit timetable presents “significant challenge” to authorities, says report

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares