• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Counties offer olive branch on deprivation role in fair funding

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Funding
  • — 27 Feb, 2019

The County Councils Network has conceded that deprivation should be a factor in the calculation of base funding to local authorities.

The network made its comments in its response to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) consultation on its Fair Funding Review, which will create a new basis for distributing resources to councils.

Publication of the proposals sparked an angry response from urban councils, which said they would be hit by the removal of the current deprivation measure in the foundation formula.

In its response, the County Councils Network, said: “Considering recent debate within the sector on deprivation we recognise that the government may wish to consider whether deprivation should be included…”

However, it said that this should only be done at a small weighting, if its inclusion was supported by evidence, and did not compromise the review’s principles of simplifying the system.

Paul Carter, chairman of the County Councils Network, said: “…if we are to see this review through – and if we are to grasp this opportunity – compromise and pragmatism on all sides of the local government sector, will be necessary. 

“We hope other parts of the sector will do likewise.

“To this end, counties are willing to compromise and explore whether there could be a role for an evidence-based deprivation weighting in the foundation formula.”

However, the response to the consultation by SIGOMA, a coalition of metropolitan and unitary authorities outside London, said that deprivation should carry “at least the same weighting” as under the previous formula.

It said: “Whilst the average picture may be of a roughly even profile of spend per head, the proposed method of calculating distribution will, by MHCLG’s own measure, consistently and significantly underfund the poorest authorities to the benefit of wealthier ones.

“It would be fundamentally unfair not to include a deprivation weighting in the foundation formula.”

SIGOMA took issue with comments in MHCLG’s consultation that deprivation is “not a major cost driver for the services included in the foundation formula”.

These include services such as waste collection, libraries, parks, housing, planning and central administration.

It said: “We have worked on the basis that a factor must explain significant variances at authority level and it is our view that the notable variance in foundation formula service costs explained by deprivation is indeed significant.”

A response to the consultation by the Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the MHCLG’s proposal to base the foundation formula on population alone “is weak”.

It said: “The statistical results cited by the MHCLG are not strong enough to support such a decision.”

A foundation formula with only population as a cost driver is likely to shift funding from urban to suburban and rural areas, it concluded.

But it added: “it is worth noting that the overall impact of the Fair Funding Review on different areas will depend on a range of other factors including spending needs formulas for other areas, assessments of revenue-raising capacity, and transitional arrangements.”

In the House of Commons in February, communities secretary James Brokenshire said: “Obviously we will look at all the representations that continue to be made during the review of relative needs and resources, but our analysis in the review demonstrates that, overall, population is by far the most important cost driver for both the upper-tier and lower-tier foundation formulae.”

He said that, while in aggregate terms deprivation is not shown to be a major cost driver for the services included in the foundation formulae, “I am of the view that relative levels of deprivation remain an important cost driver for some specific service areas such as social care.”

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Procurement, GPC, Carbon fund, Newport loans, Innovation & cuts, LAMS, Mutuals, Wolves Procurement, GPC, Carbon fund, Newport loans, Innovation & cuts, LAMS, Mutuals, Wolves 26 Jul, 2013
  • PWLB rate hike sends shockwaves through council finance sector PWLB rate hike sends shockwaves through council finance sector 9 Oct, 2019
  • Four councils set to receive funding for post-Grenfell safety works Four councils set to receive funding for post-Grenfell safety works 18 Jan, 2018
  • Auditors issue Birmingham with third section 24 notice Auditors issue Birmingham with third section 24 notice 27 Mar, 2019

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 1 day ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 1 day ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 2 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 3 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 3 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 4 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Appeals barrier to Scottish business rate reform emerges
  • Next story Business rates consultation elicits calls for more work

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.