• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • Inflation ‘biggest concern for LGPS professionals’

    May 20, 2022

  • LGA calls for government support as regulators face staffing issues

    May 19, 2022

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Counties offer olive branch on deprivation role in fair funding

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Funding
  • — 27 Feb, 2019

The County Councils Network has conceded that deprivation should be a factor in the calculation of base funding to local authorities.

The network made its comments in its response to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) consultation on its Fair Funding Review, which will create a new basis for distributing resources to councils.

Publication of the proposals sparked an angry response from urban councils, which said they would be hit by the removal of the current deprivation measure in the foundation formula.

In its response, the County Councils Network, said: “Considering recent debate within the sector on deprivation we recognise that the government may wish to consider whether deprivation should be included…”

However, it said that this should only be done at a small weighting, if its inclusion was supported by evidence, and did not compromise the review’s principles of simplifying the system.

Paul Carter, chairman of the County Councils Network, said: “…if we are to see this review through – and if we are to grasp this opportunity – compromise and pragmatism on all sides of the local government sector, will be necessary. 

“We hope other parts of the sector will do likewise.

“To this end, counties are willing to compromise and explore whether there could be a role for an evidence-based deprivation weighting in the foundation formula.”

However, the response to the consultation by SIGOMA, a coalition of metropolitan and unitary authorities outside London, said that deprivation should carry “at least the same weighting” as under the previous formula.

It said: “Whilst the average picture may be of a roughly even profile of spend per head, the proposed method of calculating distribution will, by MHCLG’s own measure, consistently and significantly underfund the poorest authorities to the benefit of wealthier ones.

“It would be fundamentally unfair not to include a deprivation weighting in the foundation formula.”

SIGOMA took issue with comments in MHCLG’s consultation that deprivation is “not a major cost driver for the services included in the foundation formula”.

These include services such as waste collection, libraries, parks, housing, planning and central administration.

It said: “We have worked on the basis that a factor must explain significant variances at authority level and it is our view that the notable variance in foundation formula service costs explained by deprivation is indeed significant.”

A response to the consultation by the Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the MHCLG’s proposal to base the foundation formula on population alone “is weak”.

It said: “The statistical results cited by the MHCLG are not strong enough to support such a decision.”

A foundation formula with only population as a cost driver is likely to shift funding from urban to suburban and rural areas, it concluded.

But it added: “it is worth noting that the overall impact of the Fair Funding Review on different areas will depend on a range of other factors including spending needs formulas for other areas, assessments of revenue-raising capacity, and transitional arrangements.”

In the House of Commons in February, communities secretary James Brokenshire said: “Obviously we will look at all the representations that continue to be made during the review of relative needs and resources, but our analysis in the review demonstrates that, overall, population is by far the most important cost driver for both the upper-tier and lower-tier foundation formulae.”

He said that, while in aggregate terms deprivation is not shown to be a major cost driver for the services included in the foundation formulae, “I am of the view that relative levels of deprivation remain an important cost driver for some specific service areas such as social care.”

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Councils overfunded last year but ‘chronic’ financial pressures remain 20th Jan, 2022
  • Room151’s 10th Anniversary: A decade has seen systemic change to funding while core values are more important than ever 8th Nov, 2021
  • Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers 19th May, 2022
  • Councils & carbon: COP26 an opportunity to confront climate change at a local level 28th Oct, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 13 hours ago

    2022 LGPS valuations: difficult discussions in uncertain times: Michelle Doman looks at the impact of inflationary pressures, the war in Ukraine, climate risk and Covid-19 on employer contributions. At the start of 2022, for Local Government Pension… dlvr.it/SQlvy9 pic.twitter.com/Dd0lrHjWNb

    Room151 16 hours ago

    Investing today: nowhere to hide: Partner Content: Alex Stanley from Ardea Investment Management suggests that investors have few places to hide amid a synchronised sell-off in both bonds and equities. However, there are catalysts that[...] dlvr.it/SQlNVC pic.twitter.com/KkGGnduzPL

    Room151 2 days ago

    Treasury to restrict PWLB loans to councils at risk of non-repayment: The Treasury has released new guidance that restricts local authorities’ access to Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) advances if there is a “more than negligible risk” of a council’s… dlvr.it/SQhLTV pic.twitter.com/vBsS7xMJdb

    Room151 2 days ago

    Mixed reaction to proposed government intervention powers: There has been a mixed reaction to the government’s legislative plans to strengthen its intervention powers over local authority finances. The Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill has proposed… dlvr.it/SQhLMB pic.twitter.com/50foWxpPGs

    Room151 2 days ago

    Post-Brexit struggles for national and local government regulators. @LGAcomms @NAOorguk Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/lga-call… #Brexit #government pic.twitter.com/s3c8ySGy5G

    Room151 2 days ago

    CIPFA: a question of transparency: Roman Haluszczak’s campaign for publication of the independent report into the collapse of CIPFA’s London Counter Fraud Hub has been rejected again by the institute. He is now calling for[...] dlvr.it/SQgC5V pic.twitter.com/08fWsHFF4g

    Room151 3 days ago

    Back to the future for the PWLB: The Public Works Loan Board is tightening its lending criteria to ensure that loans will be repaid by local government borrowers. But, asks Peter Findlay, shouldn’t they have been doing[...] dlvr.it/SQcmmm pic.twitter.com/bVv4fe0Xlv

    Room151 3 days ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 3 days ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 3 days ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 3 days ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 4 days ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Appeals barrier to Scottish business rate reform emerges
  • Next story Business rates consultation elicits calls for more work

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares