• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Delays cause Northampton audit bill to balloon

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Funding · Technical
  • — 31 Jan, 2019

Northampton Borough Council faces a large bill caused by delays to audit work on its 2016/17 accounts, which are still not formally signed off and contain an adverse value for money conclusion.

In its final audit report released this week, auditor KPMG said delays have been caused by the slow and patchy provision of information by the council and departures of key staff at the authority.

The extra work caused by the delays would more than quadruple its original fee of £71,250, it said.

The report said: “We stated during the audit committee on 26 November 2018 that this had now risen, at that date, to approximately £300,000 in total (i.e. including original scale fee).”

KPMG said it has completed further work since this date and that it would be “discussing our final proposed fee with the authority’s chief finance officer and Public Sector Audit Appointments which will reflect the additional amount of work needed to gain assurance over your financial statements.”

The quality of audit evidence initially provided by the council “did not fully align to our expectations”, according to the auditor.

Northampton failed to provide a full fixed assets register or a breakdown of fixed assets additions, the report said.

“More significantly, we were not provided with the valuation reports prior to the start of the final audit, as previously agreed with the authority,” KPMG found.

In addition, breakdowns for both debtors and creditors were incorrect and did not tie back to the accounts, and working papers for payroll did not have robust audit trails, “which made it difficult to understand what had been provided”.

The delays, meant KPMG had to spend additional time over and above what was originally planned, it said.

“These delays have had an impact on the final audit fee,” it said.

Elsewhere in the report, KPMG said that it was issuing an adverse value for money report in relation to a loan made by the council to Northampton Football Club in 2016.

In a section covering the loan and the wider loans system at the council, KPMG said: “Our findings indicate that there is an insufficiently systematic, robust, and objective due diligence process, and framework within which decisions can be made or documented.

“We are therefore unable to state that Northampton Borough Council had proper arrangements to ensure it took properly informed decisions and deployed resources to achieve planned and sustainable outcomes for taxpayers and local people.”

In a section relating to significant audit risks at the council, the auditor said it had to complete work to ensure the council corrected errors in its valuation of council housing.

The council initially failed to comply with requirements on valuation in the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accounting Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting, according to the report.

KPMG also noted that the council had used its original internal valuation of the council homes despite issues with this figure subsequently highlighted by two external valuers and the auditor itself.

This led to the value of council homes being overstated in the accounts by £6.2m, the audit report said.

A spokesperson for Northampton Borough Council said: “It is important for the residents and businesses to know that the delay in finalising our accounts is around technical accounting and presentation issues, not the financial stability of, or financial controls within the council.”

“However, during the auditing process, an error in the type of ‘discount factor’ applied to the council’s housing stock was spotted.

“Discount factors in each area tend to vary.

“Historically, the council had always used the East Midlands discount factor but the independent valuer chose to use the South East factor.

“As a result, new revaluations had to take place and before adjustments to the final account could be made.”

KPMG also said it was also required to carry out work to make a £3.5m correction to the valuation of investment properties in the council’s accounts.

Despite the problems highlighted in the audit report, the council reported a net surplus of £77m over the year.

KMPG said it anticipated issuing an unqualified audit opinion on the authority’s 2016/17 financial statements.

Despite this, it said it could not formally conclude the audit and issue an audit certificate until it has completed consideration of matters in relation to the loan to Northampton Town Football Club.

“However, we are satisfied that this work does not have a material effect on the financial statements,” it said.

Get the Room 151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • Spending watchdog probes council borrowing for property investment Spending watchdog probes council borrowing for property investment 15 May, 2019
  • CIPFA president’s blog: Commercial risk needs commercial capabilities, enhanced governance and transparency CIPFA president’s blog: Commercial risk needs commercial capabilities, enhanced governance and transparency 17 Jul, 2017
  • NAO claims poor stats ‘hiding’ effects of local government shift in capital spending NAO claims poor stats ‘hiding’ effects of local government shift in capital spending 3 Nov, 2016
  • Heritable payment, Data sharing needed, PIRC/Inalytics team up, Leicestershire broadband Heritable payment, Data sharing needed, PIRC/Inalytics team up, Leicestershire broadband 6 Sep, 2013

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 1 day ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 2 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 3 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 3 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 3 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 4 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Baseline call: Why the New Homes Bonus is increasingly unfair
  • Next story Brexit fears hit council property investments as contingency funds confirmed

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.