• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

Finance chief urges auditor scrutiny of PRS models

0
  • by Gavin Hinks
  • in Development · Funding
  • — 22 Sep, 2016

Local authority finance chiefs have been warned to have the financial models of their housing and infrastructure developments independently audited to avoid the risk of errors before projects get under way.

The caution was issued by Jonathan Bunt, strategic director at Barking and Dagenham Council, while reflecting on his authority’s development of homes for the private rented sector.

He said that a mistake was found in the model for the council’s first project for 477 units on previously contaminated land.

“We had a hugely complex financial model… albeit it was a prudent model. But the single biggest piece of advice when you are exposed to this is to have the model audited by someone independent.

“I insisted on it and they found an error. It wasn’t huge and we fixed it. But [among] the range of things it’s worth getting sacked for, an error in someone else’s spreadsheet is not one of them…”

Bunt was speaking at the inaugural Room151 FD’s Summit on housing and infrastructure development finance. At the event, held at the London Stock Exchange, Bunt also revealed that Barking and Dagenham had placed the properties with its own housing team to let, but the department was still fully developing its distinct offer to dealing with properties going into the private rented market.

Bunt said that during a second phase of development in the borough, a small number of units had been unlet when the development was completed, reducing potential year one profits.

“That journey with our housing department has been an interesting one in getting them to understand the concept of private rented housing – and the expectation that goes with that, distinct from how we maybe work with social tenants. It is a journey we are still on,” said Bunt.

Barking and Dagenham has now completed two housing development phases, the second comprised of 144 units. All the properties are let at sub market rents, predominantly at 80% of market rent but with some available at 50% and 65%.

The first project was developed with institutional funder Long Harbour while the second was completed using a loan from the European Investment Bank. The council is now working on a third phase but has also identified a much larger ambition with a draft plan in the pipeline and potential schemes valued at up to £750m.

Bunt said: “We believe by investing money at scale we can generate net revenue cash for the borough that will help with financial sustainability, aid physical regeneration and help fund front line services.”

Bunt said before the development began the council had worked to clarify to the Audit Commission that it was not social housing and should therefore not be accounted for under the Housing Revenue Account.

“We did a lot of the legwork for the other local authorities that came after us in getting that treatment clear,” said Bunt.

He said that using an institutional funder on the initial deal had helped establish the distinction with social housing.

“In our conversations with the Audit Commission and DCLG, the use of an institutional funder, rather than a traditional local authority source like PWLB, helped put some distance in their minds between what we were doing and the HRA. That was quite important.”

Bunt said councils wishing to follow the example of Barking and Dagenham should consider a close-knit and empowered team to drive projects to completion.
But he also recommended sound tax advice for development projects.

“Make sure you get the right tax advice. It seems expensive but it will repay you umpteen times over,” said Bunt.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • West Berkshire ruling complicates development schemes West Berkshire ruling complicates development schemes 11 Dec, 2018
  • Tracy Bingham: 2020, a year best forgotten but also one of learning 16 Dec, 2020
  • Business rates multiplier reform will cost local government £80bn Business rates multiplier reform will cost local government £80bn 2 Feb, 2017
  • S&P affirms BCC rating at AA+ S&P affirms BCC rating at AA+ 7 Nov, 2012

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 2 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 3 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 4 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 4 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 5 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story CIPFA’s risk study registration: Losing interest in treasury management?
  • Next story News round-up: Manchester development deal, multi-year settlement offer, business rates powers, LGPS guidance

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.