• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO

    August 18, 2022

  • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system

    August 18, 2022

  • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant

    August 17, 2022

  • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’

    August 16, 2022

  • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’

    August 15, 2022

  • Consultation opens on future of IFRS 9 statutory override

    August 12, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Financing the future

0
  • by Guest
  • in Funding
  • — 21 Sep, 2012

Phil Woolley is a Partner in Grant Thornton UK LLP’s Government Infrastructure and Advisory team.

Given the austere financial environment in which local government is operating and will continue to operate for the foreseeable future , the challenge to innovate in order  to finance infrastructure and economic development has never been greater.  Over recent years the sector has seen a good deal of innovation – here we briefly consider some of the models applied by local authorities to the financing challenge, specifically:

  • the opportunities arising from City Deal;
  • the local asset back vehicle model; and
  • area based investment fund models.

Perhaps the most recent and fundamental development has come through the announcement of the first wave of City Deals.

The Government set a challenge for eight of England’s core economic  cities – if these cities deliver more effective, accountable government, central government will transfer more powers and provide incentives for cities to apply their own solutions.

The proposals put forward by the eight cities show interesting differences in definition and priority.

Alongside the areas you’d expect cities to focus on, such as housing and regeneration of specific districts, several cities propose focusing on areas such as physical and virtual connectivity, with powers on transport and superfast broadband. Birmingham  has identified life sciences as a potential and exciting growth opportunity.

Considering both governance and financing frameworks, Manchester’s deal is particularly distinctive.  Founded on the long-established governance framework of AGMA (Association of Greater Manchester Authorities) its ‘earn-back model’ aligns investment resources and economic development returns for reinvestment in strategic priorities.  The model allows retention of additional business rates over and above that allowed by the forthcoming reform of local government finance, benefiting the city region to the tune of £30 million per year. Not that substantial in isolation, but bigger ambitions underpin this and, used effectively as enabling finance, this could unlock substantially more private investment.

The ‘earn-back model’ could offer a genuinely sustainable source of finance through which Greater Manchester is rewarded for good investment decisions made locally – being region wide and non-sector specific, it is broader in scope and potential than those funding elements more narrowly defined and tied to specific spatial (enterprise zones) or economic policy areas such as skills or apprenticeships, and to that end it marks a more substantive devolution of powers and resource.

This type of funding model is being applied elsewhere too, by a number of Cities and City Regions (often through partnership between a range of bodies including for example LEPs) in the form of area based or revolving regional infrastructure/development  funds.  At Grant Thornton we have been working with a number of clients in the establishment of these sorts of approaches.  Critical to the success of such a fund relies on:

  • being founded on and aligned to a clear economic rationale and set of priorities;
  • being seeded with sustainable sources of finance, which may include, inter alia, retained business rates from enterprise zones, community infrastructure levy, capital receipts, returns from operational assets and ERDF funding)
  • effective investment instruments through which targeted interventions can be made and future returns retained and recycled for on-going investment in to the future

The establishment of such funds can also be aligned to funding approaches  such as Tax Increment Financing to unlock developments and large infrastructure projects.

Another approach increasingly applied is the formation of a Local Asset Backed Vehicle (LABV), a long term partnership or joint venture between one or more public sector bodies and private sector partner/s. Typically, this brings together public sector land – and sometimes funding – and private sector funds into a commercial partnership, whether joint venture, limited liability partnership or corporate entity.  In this model, asset values are leveraged to raise funds for investment or regeneration projects, with the development undertaken through subsidiaries.

In our experience, local authorities (and other public sector bodies such as NHS Foundation Trusts) are becoming more adept at using their significant asset holdings not only in order to lever value and raise finance for capital investment, but also as a means to achieving more efficient ways of delivering services.  The LABV model has been used successfully to deliver a range of development types including housing, commercial, industrial and leisure.  As well as providing a vehicle through which surplus assets can be rationalised.

Grant Thornton has advised on LABVs for Croydon, which was the first council in the UK to use the LABV model, plus projects for Bournemouth, Gateshead,  Sheffield, Tunbridge Wells, Torbay and Aylesbury Vale.

The key to success in LABVs is that the council must clearly define its aspirations, expectations and objectives – a successful LABV is one which enables the respective strengths of the public sector and private sector partners to be combined to deliver sustainable investment .

The financial environment has driven significant innovation in the sector, the key question is whether the tools available to local government, and the models developed truly  provide, in terms of materiality, the necessary firepower to underpin their economic growth ambitions.

Share

You may also like...

  • Finance chiefs may have to ’embrace the uncertainty’ in financial planning 11th Jun, 2021
  • Impact Awards: Cheltenham’s tech hub and Hackney’s recovery from cyber attack 14th Apr, 2021
  • Stephen Fitzgerald: “Fast cash” may provide the answer to critical budget challenges 24th Feb, 2021
  • “Localism, localism, localism”, or simply time for better funding 19th Apr, 2021

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • London CIV appoints Dean Bowden as CEO
    • Coventry secures over £115m of funding to decarbonise transport system
    • Bexley Pension Fund appoints responsible investment consultant
    • Leeds’ £120m levelling up bids offers ‘transformational change’
    • Social care workforce crisis ‘requires government intervention’
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 8 hours ago

    Liverpool faces further government intervention as commissioners find ‘whole-council failure’: The levelling up secretary has announced that he is “minded to” expand intervention at Liverpool City Council by transferring the authority’s financial… dlvr.it/SWvgGc pic.twitter.com/cB7YeHZ9lE

    Room151 1 day ago

    Recovery position: withholding tax and the LGPS: Partner Content: Paul Sprenger from WTax talks to Room151 about how Local Government Pension Scheme funds could be missing out on millions of pounds of withholding tax recovery opportunities.… dlvr.it/SWsTfQ pic.twitter.com/z6aVMcaqHe

    Room151 1 day ago

    Treasurer societies favour permanent extension to IFRS 9 statutory override: Two treasurer society presidents have indicated their preference for the current five-year IFRS 9 statutory override to be made permanent following the government’s latest… dlvr.it/SWr3G4 pic.twitter.com/MGf9M5zC8Q

    Room151 2 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. A report by Dev Gopal, director of finance, revenues[...] dlvr.it/SWmynD pic.twitter.com/ETDd7sQA48

    Room151 2 days ago

    Luton Borough Council faces ‘grave’ £10m overspend: Luton Borough Council faces a £10m overspend in its 2022/23 budget which poses a “serious risk” to the authority’s financial sustainability. room151.co.uk/funding/luton-… pic.twitter.com/XvyTZckW6m

    Room151 1 week ago

    LATIF/FDs’ Summit ‘on course to be biggest yet’: Room151’s flagship event – the Local Authority Treasurers Investment Forum (LATIF) and FDs’ Summit – is on course to be the biggest yet, with more than 200 delegates expected. Combining[...] dlvr.it/SWSDrL pic.twitter.com/f8FXzcAdWB

    Room151 1 week ago

    ‘Local government treated worse than any other part of public sector’: Clive Betts, chair of the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee, talks to Mike Thatcher about lack of progress on levelling up, pork-barrel politics and why local government… dlvr.it/SWRk1L pic.twitter.com/Jpw0BsOsy3

    Room151 1 week ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 week ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story LEPs to get a further £25m
  • Next story What’s going on in equities?

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares