• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Conference
  • Events Calendar
  • Webcast151
  • MOTB
  • Log In
  • Register

Room 151

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews

High Court ruling clarifies councils’ SEND funding duties

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Funding
  • — 16 Apr, 2019

Local authorities can legally allocate funding for special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) using banding levels rather than having to calculate individualised provision costs, a court has ruled.

A High Court judgement last week rejected all 10 grounds of a challenge by a group of families to London Borough of Hackney’s policies on distributing SEND resources.

The court also concluded that the council had not breached its “section 42” duty to provide care for SEND pupils when it reduced one element of the funding by 5% in April last year.

A statement by law firm 11KBW, which acted for Hackney in the case, said the ruling would be welcomed by local authorities “for the clarity and common sense it brings” to a number of issues.

It said: “Welfare, equalities and consultation obligations are not traps for unwary decision-makers.

“Box-ticking assessments are not required just for the sake of meeting them.

“Hackney had made a clear commitment to continue to meet the absolute duty in section 42 to secure provision for SEND children, and backed it up by a detailed analysis of the financial implications of the proposed reduction, which showed that needs would still be met.”

The parents bringing the case argued that section 42 of the Children and Families Act 2014 places an absolute statutory requirement on councils to secure the specified provision outlined in each child or young person’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan.

Nothing in the wording of the duty allows a local authority to allocate funding through broad bands, as Hackney did, they argued.

In a witness statement, Andrew Lee, assistant director of education services at the council, said that apportioning costs individually “would in reality impose a level of administrative burden which I do not think Hackney could cope with.

“I think most local authorities would find themselves in the same position.”

However, a witness statement from Norma Hewins, headteacher at Jubilee Primary School, which has 15 children with EHC plans, disagreed, saying: “It is something we are used to doing, and it does not create an overly burdensome system.”

In his judgement, Hon. Mr. Justice Supperstone backed the council, saying: “I am satisfied that there is nothing inherent in the policy that gives rise to an unacceptable risk of unlawful decision making or unfairness and there are realistic methods by which the policy can be lawfully implemented.”

He said the council’s policy does not lead to the underfunding of SEND provision, and that…”bandings are used in the context of a system in which the SEND provision for each child must be individually reviewed every year”.

The judge concluded that Hackney, in agreeing the 5% cut to one element of the funding, “plainly focussed on determining the appropriate arrangements for SEN provision for children, and thus the council properly focussed on the arrangements for promoting the welfare of children”.

The judge also rejected other grounds of claim, including that the council had failed to meet its duties on equality, consultation and welfare safeguarding.

Irwin Mitchell, the law firm representing the families, said that it would appeal the decision.

Anne-Marie Irwin, senior associate solicitor at the firm, said: “By doing so they hope that the council will adopt a policy in which funding is allocated according to the specific provision identified for each child, and reverses its cuts to expenditure on SEND, so that children get the vital specialist support that they require.”

This week, the National Education Union released a report claiming that 93% of local authorities in England face a combined £1.2bn shortfall in SEND funding.

Share

You may also like...

  • Deprived areas benefit least from efforts to soften cuts says IFS Deprived areas benefit least from efforts to soften cuts says IFS 14 Dec, 2018
  • Manchester housing fund, DCLG appoints Hymans, JP Morgan liquidity survey, Sunderland £100m property deal Manchester housing fund, DCLG appoints Hymans, JP Morgan liquidity survey, Sunderland £100m property deal 5 Dec, 2013
  • Failure prospects, South West pool, value for money warnings, divestment rules slammed, building societies stable Failure prospects, South West pool, value for money warnings, divestment rules slammed, building societies stable 10 Dec, 2015
  • Councils mount defence as TaxPayers’ Alliance takes aim at pay Councils mount defence as TaxPayers’ Alliance takes aim at pay 12 Apr, 2017

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 2 days ago

    How can local government ‘build back better’?: Beverley Gower-Jones looks at the options for driving small business entrepreneurship in clean technologies. Innovation is essential for local authorities to save money and reduce emissions, it is the… dlvr.it/RtT3nS pic.twitter.com/bSMB6OG70t

    Room151 2 days ago

    Helen Randall: Spelthorne report places spotlight on ‘controls’: Fresh criticism of Spelthorne Council raises the question of what “good” controls look like when negotiating a property deal. Spelthorne Council’s continuing debacle over property… dlvr.it/RtSPhy pic.twitter.com/9uCOJgBcH6

    Room151 2 days ago

    Step-out strategies: Hitting the sweet spot between liquidity and ultra-short duration: Sponsored article: Jemma Clee describes how an ultra-short duration strategy can help local authorities enhance returns. Despite the expectation of a low, and… dlvr.it/RtSPZb pic.twitter.com/pdXPpv5lcN

    Room151 3 days ago

    What role will climate change have on the pricing of government bonds?: Sponsored article: Kerry Duffain finds that “vulnerability and resilience to climate change” have a significant impact on the cost of government borrowing. Ardea Investment… dlvr.it/RtNKv7 pic.twitter.com/wDjT31x4Yt

    Room151 4 days ago

    ESGenius: Slashing emissions will fuel green growth for decades: Sponsored article: Velislava Dimitrova argues that a big enough investment could mean transition to a low, or no, carbon economy can become a reality. The world needs to slash carbon[...] dlvr.it/RtKZJp pic.twitter.com/cd8S3ijERl

    Room151 4 days ago

    Prudential code: “Not perfect, but its heart is in the right place”: The new Prudential Code offers revised rules for borrowing. Nikki Bishop is sceptical it will work while Gary Fielding offers his support. Nikki Bishop I have been asked to give[...] dlvr.it/RtKZFh pic.twitter.com/OriN28lXcb

    Room151 5 days ago

    Tremendous report from @MarkSandford3 citing @room_151 no fewer than six times (despite what the @lgcplus fact checking/counting dept might tell you) #localgov commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 1/5

    Room151 2 weeks ago

    Dan Bates: Capitalisation directions are not the only tool for rebuilding finances: Dan Bates argues deep seated problems are contributing to a rush for capitalisation directions. For some time now we have been reading that a number of councils are in… dlvr.it/RspKff pic.twitter.com/xRRsgVim9u

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Blogs
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • LGPSi
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Recent Posts
    • Resources
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Exit cap proposals “threaten LGPS pension entitlements”
  • Next story Government consultation and draft guidance on LGPS pooling

© Copyright 2021 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.