• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • TfL latest to face credit-rating downgrade by Moody’s

    May 10, 2022

  • Government proposes ‘fairer, more accurate’ business rates system

    May 10, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Income losses and lack of data hamper Whitehall’s support of councils in the pandemic

0
  • by Gavin Hinks
  • in Blogs · Funding
  • — 4 Jun, 2021

MPs point to problematic information and the loss of income as major obstacles for local government finances after Covid-19 hit.

A report from MPs underlines what many local government finance chiefs already know: when the pandemic crashed across Britain last year it hit local government finances hard.

Councils had to implement and deliver waves of government aid to individuals and businesses. But the loss of income, added to long-standing funding issues, was telling, according to a report from the House of Commons public accounts committee (PAC).

The report notes: “Local authorities went into the pandemic with 82.6% of their (non-education) income, such as council tax, retained business rates and car parking charges, dependent to some extent on local conditions.”

Emergency funding came in March and April last year but, as many finance chiefs told Room151, the government was slow to grasp the implications of income losses. The PAC notes it was July before MHCLG published principles for dealing with those.


30 July 2021
Online: 10:30-12:30
Room151’s Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
All enquiries to events@room151.co.uk
Register for free with a .gov.uk email address


“Failure”

According to Richard Harbord, a Room151 columnist and former chief executive of Boston Borough Council, confronting the loss of income was the big pandemic finance issue. And even when funding was made available, it did not resolve the problem.

“The failure was undoubtedly the failure to compensate properly for loss of income,” Harbord says.

“There were so many rules and conditions around this that I think many authorities failed to get all the help they should.”

A National Audit Office report  in March revealed local government had costs and lost income pressures of £9.7bn as a result of the pandemic, while Whitehall has announced £7.9bn in extra support.

The NAO estimates lost income amounts to £2.8bn, of which car parking charges alone could account for £695m and £555m from facilities like leisure centres. Commercial income (not covered by Whitehall support) may amount to another £500m.

The PAC says Whitehall needed more information to understand the position of local government finance in the face of a national emergency. Add to that the fact that local government was not included in pandemic plans and the result was “over-optimism” about local councils and their ability to withstand the pressures of a shock event.

That should not be a surprise. MHCLG collected local government financial information annually, the PAC reports. “This approach could not provide information quickly enough to navigate a fast-moving and unprecedented pandemic.”

Improvements have been made. The NAO has praised MHCLG’s efforts to improve information gathering through a monthly survey of financial pressures, but the PAC calls for further measures asking the department to improve collection of data.
Not everyone is convinced monthly reporting is the answer. Adrian Jenkins, an expert analyst of council finances with Pixel Financial Management, says the “burden” is “considerable”.

“But a better understanding of the financial position of local authorities, and the resources that they have available, would be a step forward, with or without a pandemic,” he adds.

Structural

The call for data underlines a broad point about the PAC’s report: problems for local government during the pandemic were underlined by long-term structural problems: The local government settlement remains on an annual basis, unsuited to long-term financial planning; a review of funding has been delayed twice, the funding of social care remains unresolved.

Sharon Taylor, chair of the Local Government Association’s resources board, agrees. “Councils continue to face significant demand pressures on day-to-day services and income losses, such as from local taxation, fees and charges. We agree with the committee that the forthcoming spending review needs to provide councils with a multi-year settlement that puts local government funding on a long-term sustainable footing.

“This will enable them to more efficiently plan how to provide the local services our communities rely on and which have proved so vital during the pandemic.”

Jenkins adds: “MHCLG and the Treasury urgently need to find a way of giving local authorities greater certainty about their future funding levels, even if the full reform package cannot be implemented.  Without it, local government will not be able to manage its services effectively, or deliver the response to the pandemic that the government wants.”

The impact of the pandemic is significant. Despite all the extra funding, the PAC forecasts local government faces having to cut services during the current year, 2021-22.

Lessons

The committee calls for Whitehall to use lessons from the pandemic to prepare a better plan for local government in the event of emergencies; improve data collection and “oversight” of financial risk; set out a plan to improve and maintain understanding of the “operational realities” of local government; ensure the long-term effects of the pandemic are considered as part of the coming spending review.

But it is worth revisiting the PAC big concern: why Whitehall did not know more about local government’s disposition before the pandemic hit.

“MHCLG’s inability to properly collect or share information means that it had to quickly set up a system to do this,” says Meg Hillier, chair of the PAC. “That councils could deliver quickly is a credit to local government finance teams but begs the question of why this was not in place before the pandemic and underlines the committee’s long-standing concerns about the department’s knowledge of the sector’s financial challenges.”

She adds: “MHCLG needs to be a better champion for local government within Whitehall.”


CCLA/ROOM151 IMPACT AWARDS

Read about the awards here.

Read about the seven categories here.

See the nominations here.

To read case studies of finance team impact, click here.

—————

FREE monthly newsletters
Subscribe to Room151 Newsletters

Room151 Linkedin Community
Join here

Monthly Online Treasury Briefing
Sign up here with a .gov.uk email address

Room151 Webinars
Visit the Room151 channel

Share

You may also like...

  • Bereavement matters 20th Jul, 2021
  • Waste authority to issue green bond through UKMBA 2nd Feb, 2022
  • Net zero: Opportunities ahead for LGPS but it will require ‘honesty’ and ‘sophistication’ 27th Oct, 2021
  • Fairer funding – will the wait be worth it? 6th Apr, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 26 mins ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 4 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 5 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 5 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 6 days ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 6 days ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

    Room151 1 week ago

    Insights and inspiration from LGPS leaders past and present: Four current and former LGPS leaders have recently given powerful and insightful interviews as part of the Fiftyfaces podcast, which showcases inspiring investors and their stories. Hosted by… dlvr.it/SQ53lC pic.twitter.com/IRYMFPxdA2

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story Impact Awards: Shortlist revealed
  • Next story How does LGPS identify “authentic” place-based impact opportunities?

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares