• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • EAPF criticised for water company investments

    August 10, 2022

  • Welsh pension fund confirms £50m investment in clean energy

    August 10, 2022

  • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA

    August 10, 2022

  • Consultation opens into care charging reforms

    August 9, 2022

  • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’

    August 5, 2022

  • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades

    August 4, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

MPs declare central government has ‘shaky grasp’ of local authority finances

0
  • by Colin Marrs
  • in 151 News · Funding
  • — 4 Jul, 2018

Photo (cropped): skeeze/Pixabay, CC0

MPs have voiced scepticism over the ability of central government to ensure that local authority funding is sustainable into the next spending review period.

In a report on the financial sustainability of local authorities, a House of Commons select committee said that the Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) is “overly reliant” on a favourable outcome from the 2019 spending review.

It raised doubts about MHCLG’s ability to accurately estimate the sector’s funding needs, pointing out that councils with social care responsibilities overspent service budgets by more than £1bn, during the first year of the current spending review period, and used £858m of reserves.

Meg Hillier, chair of the communities select committee, said: “It is no secret that councils are under the cosh.

“The mystery is how central government expects their finances to improve when it has such an apparently shaky grasp of the issues.”

The report said that the department has failed to publish any of the work underlying its bid for cash during the 2015 spending review, leaving doubts about whether it understands the issues fully.

“This evidence is vital to make the case to Treasury for more funding, particularly at a time when there are so many competing calls for increased funding across Whitehall,” the report said.

Hillier added: “It beggars belief that the department responsible for the local government financial framework, and which takes the lead in assessing councils’ funding requirements, has neither an agreed measure of sustainability nor a clear definition of ‘unsustainable’.

“These are fundamental weaknesses in its approach to assessing the financial risks facing councils — and the sector as a whole — risks that, as the evidence bears out, are clear and pressing.”

The department also lacks a consistent and transparent method of assessing financial risk in local authorities, the report said.

The committee demanded that the ministry should write within six months setting out its approach to working with other central government departments to make a persuasive case for local authority funding at the next spending review.

The report said that although the ministry has a range of data and information to assess financial sustainability among councils, it does not share the methodology or results, meaning there is “therefore no shared definition of what financial sustainability means in practice in the local authority sector”.

MPs also voiced concern over the absence of a single point within government to monitor the impact of spending reductions on services. The report said this means the department may not know if pressures in one service area transfer rapidly to others.

Uncertainty over the 2019 spending review, the Fair Funding Review and the move to 75% rates retention means councils are unable to effectively manage financial planning within their medium-term financial strategies, according to the report.

“This makes it more difficult for local authorities to take a considered, long-term approach to delivering savings and making investments,” the report said.

“This is a risk both to the value-for-money of local authority spending and also to their financial sustainability.”

Hillier added: “Councils seeking to set budgets that are both sustainable and provide value for money need far greater clarity on the implications of changes to the way they are funded, and the amount of money they will have available.

“Central government’s view is, in effect, that it expects everything to work out in the end. We beg to differ.”

Richard Watts, chair of the Local Government Association’s resources board, said: “The next spending review will be make or break for local services and we agree that plugging the funding gap and placing local government on a long-term sustainable financial footing must be an urgent priority for the government.”

This week, the LGA estimated the funding gap faced by local authorities to keep services standing still at £7.8bn by 2025.

LGA chairman Lord Porter said: “If the government allows the funding gap facing councils and local services to reach almost £8bn by the middle of the next decade then our councils and local services will be damaged beyond recognition.

“The impact on society — all places, all generations, every person — will be hugely damaging.

“Millions of people will be deprived of the vital local services that help improve quality of life and bind communities together.”

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • How a digital revolution is upon us 7th Feb, 2022
  • Training momentum gathering pace in LGPS 22nd Jul, 2022
  • Michael Gove signals the end of ‘boring rollover’ settlements 22nd Dec, 2021
  • Newcastle restructure sees departure of resources director 12th Jul, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 151 BRIEFS – WHAT’s NEW?

    • Inflation ‘disastrous’ for local services, warns LGA
    • Consultation opens into care charging reforms
    • ADASS survey: ‘worst fears confirmed for adult social care’
    • GMCA to unlock funds for home energy-efficiency upgrades
    • Levelling up committee calls for urgent boost to social care funding
  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    Valuations & Risk
    LGPS Women

  • Room151’s LGPS Roundtables

    Biodiversity
    LGPS Women
    Valuations & Risk
  • Latest tweets

    Room151 9 hours ago

    Which LGPS pools and funds are attending the LGPS Investment Forum on Nov 2 & the LGPS Private Markets Forum on Nov 1st? Answer here: lnkd.in/eDHU8tuy pic.twitter.com/D3gd63Rh7F

    Room151 1 day ago

    LGPS and levelling up: nothing to fear but fear itself: There have been a number of objections to government plans for LGPS funds to invest 5% of their assets in local projects. But George Graham says these objections can be[...] dlvr.it/SWL7vt pic.twitter.com/ebwBEkZTy4

    Room151 1 day ago

    George Graham @SYpensions @bordertocoast channels his inner FDR in a call for local government pension funds to avoid the fear factor and embrace levelling up #LGPS #localgov room151.co.uk/local-governme…

    Room151 2 days ago

    Changes to rules on capital receipts raise wider questions: Stephen Kitching argues that DLUHC’s latest rule changes are part of a series following on from revisions to MRP guidance and the purchase of commercial property. He questions whether… dlvr.it/SWGqKC pic.twitter.com/Ycr5hWZDPk

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘No ifs, no buts’: the Bank of England continues its battle with inflation: Partner Content: CCLA Investment Management’s Robert Evans discusses the MPC’s 0.5% increase in the Official Bank Rate and its ongoing commitment to the 2% inflation target… dlvr.it/SW7SNC pic.twitter.com/ryOzYRSNA9

    Room151 6 days ago

    DLUHC changes rules on flexible use of capital receipts: The levelling up secretary has written to all council leaders to amend the rules concerning the flexible use of capital receipts to fund transformation projects. In his letter, Greg Clark[...] dlvr.it/SW3jyX pic.twitter.com/KEhSSaMITl

    Room151 1 week ago

    Local audit and financial reporting: let’s take back control: Mazars’ Suresh Patel suggests three steps that auditors and council finance teams should take to help get financial reporting and local audit back on track. Following my recent appearance… dlvr.it/SW0PfV pic.twitter.com/miL7pjukce

    Room151 1 week ago

    The case for residential investment: income, impact and resilience: Partner Content: Emma Gullifer from Columbia Threadneedle discusses the options for pension funds looking to invest in residential property including the Build-to-Rent market.… dlvr.it/SVzKwN pic.twitter.com/hdgZ4zKt4H

    Room151 1 week ago

    Draft accounts: delays continue despite deadline dash: Dan Bates discusses the latest data on the publication of local authority accounts and examines why so many councils missed the 31 July deadline. Sunday 31 July 2022 was the[...] dlvr.it/SVx2ZT pic.twitter.com/gdELhD3Yis

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Previous story David Green: Finding a ‘lifeline’ for problematic LOBOs
  • Next story Pooling among the options for a future Scottish LGPS

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares