• Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • LATIF
  • Conferences
  • Dashboard
  • Edit My Profile
  • Log In
  • Logout
  • Register
  • Edit this post

Room 151

  • 151 BRIEF

    What's New?

  • WMCA signs £4bn investment agreement with L&G

    May 18, 2022

  • Bill will give UK Infrastructure Bank power to lend directly to councils

    May 18, 2022

  • £400bn pension group collaborates on climate transition initiative

    May 17, 2022

  • CIPFA rejects proposal for vote on publication of fraud hub report

    May 17, 2022

  • John Turnbull elected president of the SLT

    May 12, 2022

  • Pension pool identifies biodiversity as a priority

    May 11, 2022

  • Treasury
  • Technical
  • Funding
  • Resources
  • LGPS
  • Development
  • 151 News
  • Blogs
    • David Green
    • Agent 151
    • Dan Bates
    • Richard Harbord
    • Stephen Sheen
    • James Bevan
    • Steve Bishop
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • David Crum
    • Graham Liddell
    • Ian O’Donnell
    • Jackie Shute
  • Interviews
  • Briefs

Richard Harbord: Balanced budget reform and a ‘sense of safety’

0
  • by Richard Harbord
  • in Blogs · Funding · Richard Harbord
  • — 24 Oct, 2016

Last week saw proposals that the requirement for a balanced budget should be lifted in special circumstances. However, if granted, the move could well remove a much needed element of financial security, argues Richard Harbord.

richard_harbord 520You will have read on Room151 last week of a response to the business rates consultation to the effect that in very special circumstances the requirement to make a balanced budget in every year should be relaxed and the position instead looked at over two or three years.

This is really in response to the risks that now exist in forecasting income. In particular, the move to 50% business rate retention has highlighted the difficulties of large appeals going against an authority and leading to backdated repayments. There is no doubt that the uncertainty and sudden need to repay causes severe difficulties and that these difficulties cannot always be seen and provided for.

Even the improvements of having Valuation Office Agency (VOA) liaison officers for each authority and the supply of lists of outstanding appeals does not entirely help.

The appeals list is often very long and making a judgement about which will be won and lost is not easy if you are not closely involved on the valuation side. We know that 60% of all appeals fail, but spotting the other 40% that succeed and putting a value on them is problematic.

Improvements

The business rates steering group has had several discussions about how this might be improved but there has been no satisfactory conclusion. There have been several areas of discussion.

The first is that the number of appeals is far too high. The consultation proposes a solution in having a three-stage appeal system and possibly charging a fee to appeal as a discouragement for those who automatically appeal on the off chance.

The number of appeals is far higher in the UK than anywhere else in the world. That being said, there are actually relatively few comparable property rating regimes and nowhere is the tax so high. High charges are bound to produce a large number of appeals. I suspect, following the announcements last week about the draft rating list for 2017, there will be rating agents throughout the land preparing an avalanche of appeals.

It is difficult to argue that this is wrong. The VOA takes a view and makes an assessment, the ratepayer offers a counter argument and there is often a negotiated outcome.

The system could be improved, however. If the rating list showed how the value was reached this might reduce the number of appeals because, at present, the detail of the valuation is only available on appeal. This is rather self-defeating.

The time taken to deal with appeals is also unacceptable and leads to the hefty sums involved in some repayments. However, the VOA has, like the rest of us, lost significant resource and cannot cope with the number of appeals. Thus, the view from central government is that appeals should be reduced. We shall see if the current proposals will actually have that effect. I rather suspect not.

Uncertainty

DCLG have made two attempts at the steering group to resolve uncertainty. They suggested reimbursing the authority  for the loss of income. The difficulty is that this was for “VOA mistakes”, the definition of which was unclear and would lead to uncertainty over which appeal outcomes were to be provided for by the local authority and which would be picked up at the centre.

The alternative suggestion was that the business rate be top-sliced and all appeal losses met from this top slicing. The stumbling block in this proposal, which was resisted by local authorities, was that it was unfair on authorities who have few large losses as they will be contributing more than they get from the top slice. It is a crude fix and many authorities would rather carry on reviewing the appeals, making a judgement and making a provision.

The major preoccupation at present should be the effect of the draft list. Many authorities have seen a considerable reduction in rateable values and therefore face considerably less in business rates income. However, the system resets mean that it is difficult to judge the overall effect. Decisions also need to be made on appeals on the council’s own assessments.

It is, therefore, indisputable that making and certifying a balanced budget is difficult. Business rates are only one impediment. The achievement of necessary savings within the financial year is another.

But I think that the strength of local government finance, certainly for lenders and contractors, is the sense of safety the balanced budget gives and I cannot see the Treasury agreeing to any sort of relaxation at present.

Richard Harbord is the former chief executive of Boston Borough Council.

Get the Room151 Newsletter

Share

You may also like...

  • LGPS webinar: Governance the key to TCFD implementation 1st Mar, 2021
  • Time to pause adult social care proposals 13th Apr, 2022
  • Spending review prompts more calls for long-term funding answers 13th Dec, 2021
  • LGPS: responding to the new normal 8th Mar, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Register to become a Room151 user

  • Latest tweets

    Room151 58 mins ago

    Great piece from Peter Findlay on the PWLB’s tightening of its lending criteria. He raises some pointed questions for the Treasury and explains why the ‘casino council’ characterisation was simplistic and inaccurate. #PWLB #localgov room151.co.uk/treasury/back-…

    Room151 2 hours ago

    The Queen's speech highlighted the need for accelerating UK infrastructure investment into levelling up projects and cutting emissions. @UKInfraBank #QueensSpeech #ClimateAction #emissions Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/bill-wil… pic.twitter.com/hFmF2veVIa

    Room151 2 hours ago

    Huge funding heading to the @WestMids_CA from @landg. @andy4wm #LevellingUp #netzero #regeneration Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 room151.co.uk/brief/wmca-sig… pic.twitter.com/ajhZhia6mx

    Room151 6 hours ago

    LGPS governance, Cagney and Lacey style: What regulatory response can be expected following the publication of the Good Governance project’s Phase 3 report and the closure of the Single Code of Practice consultation? Susan Black offers[...] dlvr.it/SQbfXf pic.twitter.com/xwqHOEu2AP

    Room151 1 day ago

    More evidence of the importance of emerging markets in the journey to net-zero. @BordertoCoast @BrunelPP @northernlgps @EAPensionFund @WYPF_LGPS Click the link below to read 🔻🔻 #LGPS #NetZero #NetZeroCarbon #EmergingMarkets room151.co.uk/brief/400bn-pe… pic.twitter.com/qCm0EGxzLn

    Room151 5 days ago

    ‘Urgent consultation’ issued in response to continuing audit delays: CIPFA and the Local Authority Scotland Accounts Advisory Committee (LASAAC) have announced another “urgent consultation” to consider proposals to address the latest issue that has led… dlvr.it/SQJ0kV pic.twitter.com/s6vw0bnGXO

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery: HRAs have been freed up and councils are starting to invest, but some remain cautious, writes Steve Partridge. He suggests that a minimum of £10bn of additional borrowing could be[...] dlvr.it/SQDvxk pic.twitter.com/yZmoWzHv6U

    Room151 6 days ago

    Bags of capacity – now to housing delivery room151.co.uk/treasury/bags-…

    Room151 1 week ago

    To Michael Gove: a modest proposal: Conrad Hall has written an open letter to the levelling up secretary suggesting an unusual (and tongue-in-cheek) proposal to help councils predict next year’s government grant. Dear Secretary of State,[...] dlvr.it/SQ9GpX pic.twitter.com/mSX1xgeL8a

    Room151 1 week ago

    Queen’s Speech: an ambitious plan hampered by omissions: Richard Harbord examines the impact of the government’s legislative proposals on councils, and concludes that local authorities expect and need more from central government. However you view the… dlvr.it/SQ8hmP pic.twitter.com/BsnziyNPIO

  • Categories

    • 151 News
    • Agent 151
    • Audit
    • Blogs
    • Business rates
    • Chris Buss
    • Cllr John Clancy
    • Council tax
    • Dan Bates
    • David Crum
    • David Green
    • Development
    • Education
    • Forum
    • Funding
    • Governance
    • Graham Liddell
    • Housing
    • Ian O'Donnell
    • Infrastructure
    • Interviews
    • Jackie Shute
    • James Bevan
    • Jobs
    • Levelling up
    • LGPS
    • Mark Finnegan
    • Net Zero
    • Private markets
    • Recent Posts
    • Regulation
    • Resources
    • Responsible investing
    • Richard Harbord
    • Risk management
    • Social care
    • Stephen Fitzgerald
    • Stephen Sheen
    • Steve Bishop
    • Technical
    • Transport
    • Treasury
    • Uncategorized
    • William Bourne
  • Archives

    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2016
    • 2015
    • 2014
    • 2013
    • 2012
    • 2011
  • Previous story SDCT calls for balanced budget exemption
  • Next story Agent151: The ‘cathedral of complexity’ at the heart of devolution

© Copyright 2022 Room 151. Typegrid Theme by WPBandit.

0 shares